Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

2011 Toyota Tundra gets more powerful V6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 07:24 PM
  #1  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
Thread Starter
2UR-GSE Owner
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,476
Likes: 321
From: California
Default 2011 Toyota Tundra gets more powerful V6

2011 Toyota Tundra gets more powerful V6



The full-size truck market here in the United States is about as accommodating as a pool full of piranhas and rusty razor blades. In this one, shining segment, the Big Three enjoy unparalleled dominance; safe from attack from intruders from Japan and Germany thanks to a quirk in the tax structure and a lifetime worth of experience in crafting vehicles built to work.

Toyota is attempting to lure buyers away from the F-150, Silverado and Ram by offering a more powerful V6 engine in the 2011 Tundra. The automaker says that the reworked 4.0-liter V6 now packs the company's variable valve-timing technology, helping it churn out a full 270 horsepower. That's a bump of around 34 ponies compared to last year. Similarly, torque will see a nudge up to 278 pound-feet of twist, though the company hasn't said where in the rev band those numbers show up. Toyota has been using its twin variable valve timing system on both its 4.6- and 5.7-liter V8s to increase power and fuel economy for years, but this is the first time it has shown up on the smaller displacement six-pot

http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/10/t...oost-for-2011/
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 07:43 PM
  #2  
MPLexus301's Avatar
MPLexus301
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,044
Likes: 1
From: Friend Zone
Default

Nice update
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2010 | 04:22 AM
  #3  
rdgdawg's Avatar
rdgdawg
Pole Position
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,794
Likes: 0
From: Lake Country, WI
Default

Apples to apples engine comparison, I'd take the F-150s....
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2010 | 04:14 PM
  #4  
LexJaq's Avatar
LexJaq
Rookie
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default

Agree, that's a nice update. I wonder whether the torque peak ended up further up the rev band, though.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2010 | 01:54 PM
  #5  
MR_F1's Avatar
MR_F1
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

Take a look at the 4Runner and you will get your answer.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2010 | 03:58 PM
  #6  
TRDFantasy's Avatar
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
From: A better place
Default

It's about time. Next-gen Tundra needs to be extremely competitive. Toyota also needs to FINALLY offer a REAL HEAVY DUTY version of the Tundra. There were lots of rumors that they were going to release an HD version of the current generation, but that wasn't to be.

All the American trucks are very competitive and up to date, and the F-Series absolutely dominates.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2010 | 06:23 PM
  #7  
IS-SV's Avatar
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 1
From: tech capital
Default

Yes about time, certainly not setting any new standards with that news.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2010 | 10:25 PM
  #8  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,464
Likes: 251
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by TRDFantasy
It's about time. Next-gen Tundra needs to be extremely competitive. Toyota also needs to FINALLY offer a REAL HEAVY DUTY version of the Tundra. There were lots of rumors that they were going to release an HD version of the current generation, but that wasn't to be.
If Toyota, like you suggest, is going to do a real heavy-duty truck, then they are going to have to put a stop to cost-cutting in the Tundra's design and use better-quality, heavier-duty parts. You can't be using C-Channel frame rails, sub-standard sheet metal, and tailgates that buckle under the bed-load like the current Tundra had when it debuted in 2006. And, yes.....a diesel dual-rear-wheel model for some heavy-duty stuff, if they want to compete with the F-350 and Silverado/Ram 3500.


All the American trucks are very competitive and up to date, and the F-Series absolutely dominates.
Agreed, and, for decades, the F-150 has dominated, though there are indications that the newer Silverados are catching up in their reputation. GM has worked hard to make the new Silverado as attractive as the F-series. The latest Dodge Ram has also made some significant interior upgrades.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2010 | 10:44 PM
  #9  
TRDFantasy's Avatar
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
From: A better place
Default

Agreed. Some of the quality problems on the current Tundra have been disappointing. If Toyota wants to be more competitive, the Tundra will definitely need to use higher-quality, heavier duty parts.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2010 | 11:08 PM
  #10  
LexusMan77's Avatar
LexusMan77
Pole Position
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Its funny that the previous generation Tundra had a great quality interior and body, but was only lack in size/power/models. Now, this current generation Tundra has the size(huge), power train, and many models, but the quality is crap. When will Toyota get the Tundra right?
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2010 | 11:14 PM
  #11  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,464
Likes: 251
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by LexusMan77
Its funny that the previous generation Tundra had a great quality interior and body, but was only lack in size/power/models. Now, this current generation Tundra has the size(huge), power train, and many models, but the quality is crap. When will Toyota get the Tundra right?
Nissan didn't get it completely right, either. The big Titan, unlike the 1Gen Tundra, had the required size/power from the start, but, while the truck didn't use flimsy parts like the 2Gen Tundra, it had assembly-quality problems at the notorious Canton, MS plant, which also built the Nissan Armada and Infiniti QX-56..
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 06:18 AM
  #12  
MR_F1's Avatar
MR_F1
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

Most people who own the Tundra are quite happy with it, and don't think it has crap quality.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 06:26 AM
  #13  
Joeb427's Avatar
Joeb427
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 11,670
Likes: 20
From: SC
Default

Originally Posted by rdgdawg
Apples to apples engine comparison, I'd take the F-150s....
I agree.
I'd go F-150 too.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 07:19 AM
  #14  
durtysc300's Avatar
durtysc300
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 1
From: Arizona
Default

The new F150 is nice, but after driving my neighbors Platinum, I still prefer my dads new Ram 2500 with the 6 speed..I found it to be more comfortable and I really liked the interior more.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hoovey689
Car Chat
4
Dec 15, 2011 04:00 PM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
3
Sep 27, 2011 07:02 AM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
45
Aug 25, 2011 08:55 PM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
31
Feb 27, 2011 11:30 PM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
26
Oct 24, 2010 09:34 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:48 PM.