Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

5 Dead Auto Brands And Why They Died

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 20, 2010 | 09:47 AM
  #1  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post 5 Dead Auto Brands And Why They Died

http://finance.yahoo.com/insurance/a...nsurance-autos

5 Dead Auto Brands And Why They Died
by Jean Folger
Sunday, June 20, 2010

provided by
investopedia_logo.jpg

Ever since Henry Ford's Model T popularized automobiles in 1908, car companies have worked tirelessly designing, manufacturing, marketing and selling different models in the hopes that each would enjoy longevity in the marketplace. The brands associated with the major players have in recent years been challenged in terms of sales, and in some cases have been abandoned altogether. Ford Motor Company's (NYSE: F - News) June 2, 2010 announcement about its decision to discontinue the Mercury brand is the latest in a series of brand terminations. Whether out of financial necessity or the desire to streamline product lines, here are five auto brands that have faded away.

1. Mercury

Mercury is a brand of the Ford Motor Company that has been around for over 70 years. Ford recently decided in early June to end Mercury production before the end of the year. Mercury was originally created to offer Ford customers a premium vehicle. The continued popularity and corresponding sales of the Ford branded vehicles has left the Mercury brand weak, with many of its loyal customers now driving Fords.



Ford Motor Company has a 16% market share in the United States, with Mercury contributing only 0.8%. Mercury's market share has been flat or declining for years, and Ford Motor Company has decided to focus its attention on the Ford brand and its luxury Lincoln brand.

2. Hummer

In February, 2010, General Motors (Pinksheets: MTLQQ.PK - News) announced it would be phasing out its Hummer brand after an unsuccessful attempt to sell the brand to a Chinese manufacturer. Hummer, with roots that go back to the 1992 military Humvees, faced challenges in recent years as consumers became more conscious about vehicle gas mileage. Hummers are notorious gas guzzlers and took criticism from environmental groups pressing for more fuel efficient vehicles.

Hummer is one of several recent General Motors brands to be discontinued

3. Pontiac

Anyone who paid attention on the road in the 1960s and 1970s took notice of muscle cars - those sleek, high performance vehicles with V8 engines that could be heard from a mile away. A brand of General Motors, Pontiac made vehicles and muscle cars that defined an era with legendary models such as the GTO and Trans Am.

Though Pontiac was at one time one of the top selling brands in the United States, its leadership was unable to devise a strategy that would allow the Pontiac brand to continue. In business since 1926, Pontiac was discontinued in April, 2009.

4. Saturn

General Motors halted production of its Saturn brand in October, 2009 after a deal to sell to Penske Automotive Group failed. Saturn, with a vehicle line that included mostly small to mid-size cars, had been around since 1985. General Motors has enjoyed successful brands over the years, but Saturn struggled and was never profitable.

General Motors filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in mid-2009, and was the recipient of U.S. government TARP loans (bailout) following the economic meltdown of 2008. Under scrutiny to pay back loans and become a sustainable corporation, GM has been forced to streamline its brands and focus on the lines that have the most potential.

5. Oldsmobile

Another General Motors brand, Oldsmobile was founded as the Olds Motor Vehicle Company in 1897. Claiming to be the first company to mass-produce vehicles, Oldsmobile joined GM in 1908. Oldsmobile was the first brand to come with fully automatic transmissions, debuted in the 1940 Hydra-Matic models. Competitive with both Chevrolet and Ford, Oldsmobile's Cutlass series became the best-selling car in the United States in 1976. GM pulled the plug in 2004, citing that "Oldsmobile production has remained unprofitable" and that it would therefore end manufacturing.

The Bottom Line

Since the invention of the automobile, brands have come and gone. Many have faded away, but a few remain strong in the hearts of collectors and enthusiasts, making occasional appearances at auto shows, or in magazines and online venues. The auto industry, which produced more than 60 million vehicles in 2009, is the most significant economic sector in terms of revenues.

Facing rising fuel costs, changes in consumer spending habits and increased volatility in raw materials pricing - particularly steel - the auto industry has been forced to analyze its fleets in an attempt to streamline production. As automobile manufacturers respond to a dynamic climate, others may join the ranks of dead auto brands.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2010 | 10:03 AM
  #2  
Haitwun's Avatar
Haitwun
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: Ca
Default

There was also Eagle and Plymouth among many others. Good riddance to bad rubbish.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2010 | 11:41 AM
  #3  
AlexusAnja's Avatar
AlexusAnja
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,189
Likes: 16
From: NY/NJ
Default

I think that in the days, when each was their own separate company and there was actual competition from over 10 different companies, it created a more robust industry and there was actually innovation. What happened was Ford, GM, and Chrysler were just gobbling up companies and putting them under their wings and duplicating various products amongst the makes that it diluted the market with "same" vehicles.

Is it any coincidence that all but the one (Mercury) were former GM makes? What company can focus when they have Chevy, GMAC, Pontiac, Oldz, Hummer, Saab, Saturn, Cadillac, etc. and on... you can't possibly have ten strong makes, so you have to cut the fat and now concentrate on three or four makes.

Hey, it's just how it is...
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2010 | 01:04 PM
  #4  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
2UR-GSE Owner
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,476
Likes: 321
From: California
Default

^^ True that
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2010 | 01:11 PM
  #5  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,511
Likes: 261
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

1. Mercury

Mercury is a brand of the Ford Motor Company that has been around for over 70 years. Ford recently decided in early June to end Mercury production before the end of the year. Mercury was originally created to offer Ford customers a premium vehicle. The continued popularity and corresponding sales of the Ford branded vehicles has left the Mercury brand weak, with many of its loyal customers now driving Fords.



Ford Motor Company has a 16% market share in the United States, with Mercury contributing only 0.8%. Mercury's market share has been flat or declining for years, and Ford Motor Company has decided to focus its attention on the Ford brand and its luxury Lincoln brand.
I agree that Mercury declined, but don't necesarily agree on the reason WHY. Ford itself, to a large extent, neglected the division, causing much of the decline itself. It was almost as if Ford didn't WANT Mercury to survive.

2. Hummer

In February, 2010, General Motors (Pinksheets: MTLQQ.PK - News) announced it would be phasing out its Hummer brand after an unsuccessful attempt to sell the brand to a Chinese manufacturer. Hummer, with roots that go back to the 1992 military Humvees, faced challenges in recent years as consumers became more conscious about vehicle gas mileage. Hummers are notorious gas guzzlers and took criticism from environmental groups pressing for more fuel efficient vehicles.

Hummer is one of several recent General Motors brands to be discontinued
It was many of the same people (a number of who were disciples of arch-liberal Arianna Huffington, and her famous anti-SUV rants) who stirred up not only a lot of the Anti-Hummer rhetoric, but also much of the campaign against the big Ford Excursion, which was also dropped. Frankly, the Excursion DID have its shortcomings (its steering/handling/braking, for example, bordered on the absurd because it was simply too heavy for its chassis), but, for those who could put up with its squirrelly road manners, it was a good tow/haul machine.

3. Pontiac

Anyone who paid attention on the road in the 1960s and 1970s took notice of muscle cars - those sleek, high performance vehicles with V8 engines that could be heard from a mile away. A brand of General Motors, Pontiac made vehicles and muscle cars that defined an era with legendary models such as the GTO and Trans Am.

Though Pontiac was at one time one of the top selling brands in the United States, its leadership was unable to devise a strategy that would allow the Pontiac brand to continue. In business since 1926, Pontiac was discontinued in April, 2009.

The one cancellation here that I more or less agree with. Outside of the Australian/Holden-based GTO and G8, the Division produced little that was of interest. The G6 did have a folding-hard-top at a reasonable price, but with low overall build quality and an overly-cheap-plasctic, coal-mine-black interior. It would have been interesting to see the new Camaro debut with an F-Body Firebird twin, but there is at least one aftermarket company already doing a conversion.

4. Saturn

General Motors halted production of its Saturn brand in October, 2009 after a deal to sell to Penske Automotive Group failed. Saturn, with a vehicle line that included mostly small to mid-size cars, had been around since 1985. General Motors has enjoyed successful brands over the years, but Saturn struggled and was never profitable.

General Motors filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in mid-2009, and was the recipient of U.S. government TARP loans (bailout) following the economic meltdown of 2008. Under scrutiny to pay back loans and become a sustainable corporation, GM has been forced to streamline its brands and focus on the lines that have the most potential.
The most senseless cancellation of them all, in my opinion. Saturn, at one time, HAD fantastic small vehicles with potential, and then gave them all up for Opel/Vauxhall/GM-badged clones. Much has been made of the argument that dropping Saturn was a good buisness decision in the climate of today. I agree, based on what the division had become, but, like Mercury, it didn't HAVE to turn out that way. GM allowed it to deteriorate by taking it in a new (and disastrous) direction after 2000.

5. Oldsmobile

Another General Motors brand, Oldsmobile was founded as the Olds Motor Vehicle Company in 1897. Claiming to be the first company to mass-produce vehicles, Oldsmobile joined GM in 1908. Oldsmobile was the first brand to come with fully automatic transmissions, debuted in the 1940 Hydra-Matic models. Competitive with both Chevrolet and Ford, Oldsmobile's Cutlass series became the best-selling car in the United States in 1976. GM pulled the plug in 2004, citing that "Oldsmobile production has remained unprofitable" and that it would therefore end manufacturing.
It was mostly Oldsmobile's demise that made Buick what it is today....that's where most of the potential Olds customers went to. And, likely, that's where most of Mercury's former customers are headed to. Ford is going to (probably) lose them to Buick, not its own Ford or Lincoln divisions.

Last edited by mmarshall; Jun 20, 2010 at 01:15 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2010 | 07:23 PM
  #6  
ecr527's Avatar
ecr527
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 1
From: South FLA
Default

I think I read somewhere that the G8 is supposed to be resurrected as a Chevy Caprice. I think that would be a good thing as I always thought that it was a decent looking car. Altough I've never driven one, it seemed that it had good build quality too.

If it wasn't for the Chinese market, I think Buick would have definitely been a part of this list.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 05:22 AM
  #7  
tex2670's Avatar
tex2670
Lexus Champion
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Liked
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,064
Likes: 105
From: Southeastern PA
Default

Originally Posted by ecr527
I think I read somewhere that the G8 is supposed to be resurrected as a Chevy Caprice. I think that would be a good thing as I always thought that it was a decent looking car. Altough I've never driven one, it seemed that it had good build quality too.

If it wasn't for the Chinese market, I think Buick would have definitely been a part of this list.
It has been resurrected as a Caprice for the Police Interceptor market--but I haven't read anything for mass sales.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 05:30 AM
  #8  
Rash's Avatar
Rash
hmm
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 12,126
Likes: 3
From: dxb
Default

The Pontiac G8 is the Chevy Lumina in the Middle East.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 08:38 AM
  #9  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,511
Likes: 261
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by Rashoodz
The Pontiac G8 is the Chevy Lumina in the Middle East.

Correct. And it's a shame we don't get the El Camino version either. Pontiac was going to bring a rebadged version into the American market until the division folded.

Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 09:23 AM
  #10  
IS-SV's Avatar
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 1
From: tech capital
Default

The reasons why are very subjective, the speculation endless.

Primarily they were business decisions (made by companies intending to be profitable, not charities) that needed to happen and all had a horrid history of huge multi-million dollar losses.

One thing is certain, all are dead.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 03:43 PM
  #11  
Sufiztic's Avatar
Sufiztic
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

When I found out thru the wire that Holden was partnering up with GM to rebadge the G8 as a Pontiac with a LS Small Block V8 RWD over to our Shores, I was all over it. I waited for the 08's to go thru to see how well they did and see the reviews they received. When I saw all the good Reviews, I went to Pontiac, test drove it and bought it that same day. I've never looked back. Best buy I've made vehicle wise.

I was in the market for the IS350, 335i Sedan, G37 Sport Sedan and CTS. Boy I'm glad I waited, saved me quite a few pennys. The cars I test drove were great, except the price, not including options, yikes!

And yes, the "G8" now Caprice, has been brought back as the new Chevrolet Police Vehicle.

http://www.g8board.com/forums/showth...hlight=caprice
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 11:18 PM
  #12  
rld14's Avatar
rld14
Lead Lap
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 746
Likes: 4
From: NJ
Default

It's simple, they were deadwood. Part of the reason that the big 3 got into so much trouble is that they had brand structures set up like it was still 1957 and Detroit basically owned the US Car market.

Back then, things were simple...

A handful of people bought XK150s, MGs, Beetles, etc.

Over 90% of the people out there bought domestic cars.

Cheap cars: Chevrolet, Plymouth, Ford, back then they were called the "Low Priced 3".

Next, you had the "Medium Priced" cars. They started with Mercury, Pontiac and Dodge, and moved up to Oldsmobile, Buick and Chrysler.

Then you had Cadillac, Lincoln and Imperial.

Imports simply did not exist as a major factor in the marketplace, so instead of Fusion/Camry/Altima/Malibu/Accord it was Chevy vs Ford vs Plymouth and the people that today would look at an Avalon or a Maxima or an ES350 would buy a Buick or fancy Mercury.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2010 | 06:33 AM
  #13  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,511
Likes: 261
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by rld14
It's simple, they were deadwood. Part of the reason that the big 3 got into so much trouble is that they had brand structures set up like it was still 1957 and Detroit basically owned the US Car market.

Back then, things were simple...

A handful of people bought XK150s, MGs, Beetles, etc.

Over 90% of the people out there bought domestic cars.

Cheap cars: Chevrolet, Plymouth, Ford, back then they were called the "Low Priced 3".

Next, you had the "Medium Priced" cars. They started with Mercury, Pontiac and Dodge, and moved up to Oldsmobile, Buick and Chrysler.

Then you had Cadillac, Lincoln and Imperial.

Imports simply did not exist as a major factor in the marketplace, so instead of Fusion/Camry/Altima/Malibu/Accord it was Chevy vs Ford vs Plymouth and the people that today would look at an Avalon or a Maxima or an ES350 would buy a Buick or fancy Mercury.
One thing, though, that you were forgetting, is that, back then, the line between "domestics" and "imports" was much sharper and more defined than it is now. With some rare exceptions like the Buick Opel, Ford Cortina, and Plymouth Cricket, "American" vehicles were designed, built, and sold in America. "Imports" were designed/built overseas, and imported into the U.S. for sale. You knew exactly what you were getting, and where it was built. The industry is no longer like that..........vehicles, no matter what their nameplates or nationality of the automaker, are designed, built, and sold all over the world. It is so complex that even many professional auto consultants and journalists can no longer keep up with it........and what car comes from what origin. In general, because of the intelligence and competence of many of our posters, we, here at CL and CAR CHAT, do a pretty good job of keeping track of it, considering its admitted complexity.

Last edited by mmarshall; Jun 23, 2010 at 06:36 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2010 | 11:06 AM
  #14  
Trexus's Avatar
Trexus
CL Community Team
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 61
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
One thing, though, that you were forgetting, is that, back then, the line between "domestics" and "imports" was much sharper and more defined than it is now. With some rare exceptions like the Buick Opel, Ford Cortina, and Plymouth Cricket, "American" vehicles were designed, built, and sold in America. "Imports" were designed/built overseas, and imported into the U.S. for sale. You knew exactly what you were getting, and where it was built. The industry is no longer like that..........vehicles, no matter what their nameplates or nationality of the automaker, are designed, built, and sold all over the world. It is so complex that even many professional auto consultants and journalists can no longer keep up with it........and what car comes from what origin. In general, because of the intelligence and competence of many of our posters, we, here at CL and CAR CHAT, do a pretty good job of keeping track of it, considering its admitted complexity.
With respect it really isn't that complex as you make it. American cars are just that...American as with Japanse, German, Italian, Korean, Chinese, Indian, etc...just because Ford or Chrysler has plants in Mexico or various parts are made in Mexico doesn't mean it's a Mexican company. Ford, Chrysler (which is partly owned by Fiat) or GM is American through and through. Ford's or GM's engineering, policies, procedures, philosophies, methods, responsibilities, accountability, supervision, design, etc., etc. are American.

Same thing with Toyota. Toyota is Japanese through and through. Yes, Toyota has plants here in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Asia and all over the world but Toyota is still Japanese. If Toyota built a plant on Antartica does it make it an Antartican company?

If Toyota built a plant on Mars, produces cars in the same plant built on Mars does it make it a Martian company???

Last edited by Trexus; Jun 23, 2010 at 11:36 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2010 | 11:25 AM
  #15  
madoka's Avatar
madoka
Intermediate
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

I remember reading an interview with some Oldsmobile VPs. They said that they knew they were doomed one snowy day in MI. It snowed bad that day, but they got into a SUV and went to the Oldsmobile CEO's house to pick her up and go to work. When they got to her house, she wasn't interested in going into work that day. Then they realized that their leader's heart wasn't really into the company and several months later they were shut down.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:45 PM.