Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

Over 500hp LS1 RX-7 (FD)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 08:28 AM
  #1  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post Over 500hp LS1 RX-7 (FD)





















Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 08:43 AM
  #2  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,430
Likes: 249
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

With the LS-1 torque, I'll bet you'll see some acceleration in that car. The 3Gen RX-7's body/chassis was very lightly built....TOO light, in some areas, where rough roads could bend some chassis/steering parts. However, the LS-1 engine is far heavier than the standard lightweight aluminum twin-turbo, twin-rotor the RX-7 came with, making it much more nose-heavy, so the handling/braking limits might not be as good on the skidpad.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 08:43 AM
  #3  
GSteg's Avatar
GSteg
Rookie
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,018
Likes: 81
From: CA
Default

Not too crazy about the way it looks, but the LS1 changed my mind. I need sound clips!!
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 08:55 AM
  #4  
bagwell's Avatar
bagwell
Lexus Champion
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,204
Likes: 11
From: The Woodlands, TX
Default

yep, LS1 is the only good part here IMO

and I'm an RX7 lover!
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 09:03 AM
  #5  
tmf2004's Avatar
tmf2004
5% Club. Killing it!!!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,942
Likes: 64
From: FL
Default

That is a wide body
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 10:03 AM
  #6  
shern's Avatar
shern
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,468
Likes: 2
From: AZ
Default

Carbon Fiber Body
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 02:15 PM
  #7  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
2UR-GSE Owner
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,476
Likes: 321
From: California
Default

mmmm TE37s
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 03:03 PM
  #8  
baddis es's Avatar
baddis es
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 2
From: FL
Default

seems underpowered for a an LS1 on boost...LS1's can get around 450whp N/A, i'd expect at least 600whp

however...the FD body and a V8 is one of my dreams. give me a pearly white FD with a 6.0L from and 05-06 GTO and i'm a very happy person!
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 04:14 PM
  #9  
Lexwang07's Avatar
Lexwang07
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 896
Likes: 1
From: CA
Default

Wow! Whole body made of dry carbon fiber. The cost of carbon fiber parts are expensive. The engine sway from Chevy Corvette LS1 engine. It's an eye candy show car.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 04:47 PM
  #10  
Lets Drive's Avatar
Lets Drive
Racer
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 8
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
With the LS-1 torque, I'll bet you'll see some acceleration in that car. The 3Gen RX-7's body/chassis was very lightly built....TOO light, in some areas, where rough roads could bend some chassis/steering parts. However, the LS-1 engine is far heavier than the standard lightweight aluminum twin-turbo, twin-rotor the RX-7 came with, making it much more nose-heavy, so the handling/braking limits might not be as good on the skidpad.
I suppose it varies, but the LS longblock is only heavier than the 13B-REW by about ~50lbs, which can be compensated through other mods (ranging from battery relocation to lower weight subframes). While the shortblock itself is light, when you consider the weight of the turbo system/plumbing, along with the cast-iron rotors and exhaust manifold, and other bits, it adds up. Its also interesting to note that the LS motors crankshaft and tranny sit lower than the eccentric shaft in the 13B-REW, which is a nice tradeoff to help offset the difference in weight.

The car actually handles and brakes virtually the same, if not better, while having a broader powerband to work with.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 08:14 PM
  #11  
JessePS's Avatar
JessePS
Lexus Test Driver
CL Folding 25,000
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,349
Likes: 0
From: QC/FRANCE
Default

Nicely done

Its a nice change seeing an import using a domestic engine.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 08:37 PM
  #12  
speedflex's Avatar
speedflex
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,545
Likes: 0
From: MO
Default

It better be really fast because it's ugly as sin. The stock RX-& is a handsome looking machine.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 09:46 PM
  #13  
Faraaz23's Avatar
Faraaz23
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Default

I admire the incredible amount of work that has gone into that car, but i'm with mmarshall as far as the handling aspect goes. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but the Wankel is decently smaller than the LS1 and was closer to the firewall. Therefore even if the LS1 is close to the same weight, the car will be more nose-heavy.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 07:09 AM
  #14  
Lets Drive's Avatar
Lets Drive
Racer
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 8
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by Faraaz23
I admire the incredible amount of work that has gone into that car, but i'm with mmarshall as far as the handling aspect goes. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but the Wankel is decently smaller than the LS1 and was closer to the firewall. Therefore even if the LS1 is close to the same weight, the car will be more nose-heavy.
While the 13B-REW is smaller, you're only refering to the short-block. Once you dress the motor up with its heavier cast-iron components, the weight quickly increases. If you think about it, the fact that you can fit a V8 into the engine bay of such a small rotary motor, says something...the turbo plumbing and other accessories add a lot of bulk/weight to the engine.

While the aluminum LS does add a bit more weight, you're talking about a very small amount, and even then, the majority of the weight sits behind the front axle*. While weight isn't desirable, its also a matter of where you place it. The rotaries e-shaft sits higher, which also means the tranny sits higher in the stock car**. The LS' crankshaft and tranny both sit lower. Compensating for the remaining weight is trivial, when you consider a battery relocation easily shifts 40+ lbs from the upper front of the car. When you consider the weight difference in the swap is roughly 50lbs, it requires little relative effort to regain the 50/50 weight distribution (which isn't as important as made out to be). The cars handling remains excellent and many competition V8 RX-7s outperform their rotary counterparts, though thats due to a few other factors/bonuses, such as the difference in torque curve, gearing, and tires.

* http://www.rx7club.com/attachment.ph...1&d=1189361834

Up against the firewall
http://www.rx7club.com/attachment.ph...1&d=1180322876

**Tranny tunnel is huge...large enough to fit the Chevy T56.

http://i540.photobucket.com/albums/g...all/LS2001.jpg

http://i540.photobucket.com/albums/g...Bangkok016.jpg


Photos belong to their respective owners on rx7club and V8RX7forum.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 07:16 AM
  #15  
muhbuhtuh's Avatar
muhbuhtuh
Lexus Champion
CL Folding 25,000
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,905
Likes: 0
From: FL
Default

nice imformative posts shinobi

and i kinda like the carbon fiber body.. but other than that the car is hot!!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:59 AM.