When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Honestly, for 22K, I would rather get a base Mustang or Camaro. I might get criticized for this, but I prefer the styling of the Camaro and Mustang over both the Si and Genesis Coupe. It's just personal preference.
Plus, for daily driving and for performance, the Mustang and Camaro have decent-to-good powerbands in the base drivetrains. You don't need to put up with goofy drawbacks like revving sky-high to reach usable power, or having power reduced when you shift too hard.
I would ultimately lean towards the Mustang just because it has less problems than the Camaro, and has been more tuned, refined, and honed than the new Camaro.
If you're talking base models, both the Camaro and Mustang are a joke. Save your cash for an extra year or two and get one with a real engine.
The Genesis if far better looking than the Civic....plus the added bonus is....you don't have to be a Civic driver.
have u even driven either one?
neither will need you to rev "sky high" to move anywhere decently quick. drive normally (under 3k) and you will be accelerating faster than most ppl from the light.
Have you? I grew up on Hondas. I'm currently driving my 13th. The Civic SI doesn't have enough low end torque to loosen a lug nut! It's painfully weak below 5,000 RPM. It actually borders on rediculously slow. They do move, yes, but you have to keep revs above 5,500 RPM, something most people are uncomfortable with. Like someone else said in this thread, it's fun at first, but it gets tiring real fast.