With todays technology I can foresee them using this once again
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 34,122
Likes: 487
From: My little world
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWWYk...layer_embedded
50's Ford "wrist twist" technology never made it to production, but todays drive by wire technology just may bring these types of designs back in the light one day.
50's Ford "wrist twist" technology never made it to production, but todays drive by wire technology just may bring these types of designs back in the light one day.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWWYk...layer_embedded
50's Ford "wrist twist" technology never made it to production, but todays drive by wire technology just may bring these types of designs back in the light one day.
50's Ford "wrist twist" technology never made it to production, but todays drive by wire technology just may bring these types of designs back in the light one day.
If it didnt make it back then...why would it work today?
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 34,122
Likes: 487
From: My little world
I grew up with 60's-vintage cars, and learned to drive on them. Back then, steering systems on American cars were almost exclusively the recirculating-ball type, with slow ratios and some free-play across the center of the wheel.....in other words, pure slop. On Ford products like in the video, that was made even more so by the notoriously soft Ford chassis/suspension systems that allowed even more sponginess (Chrysler products had firmer torsion bar/leaf suspensions). So, it is not surprising that Ford looked for a different way of steering.
Today, with comfortably-padded steering wheels, rack-and-pinion steering systems, radial tires, responsive chassis/suspensions, etc.... joysticks, IMO, are not needed, except, perhaps, for some handicapped people who can only drive with one arm...or hand. Even back in the 60's, though, that problem was addressed by having a big **** on the steering wheel that you grabbed and rotated it with. It took some getting used to, but worked.
Today, with comfortably-padded steering wheels, rack-and-pinion steering systems, radial tires, responsive chassis/suspensions, etc.... joysticks, IMO, are not needed, except, perhaps, for some handicapped people who can only drive with one arm...or hand. Even back in the 60's, though, that problem was addressed by having a big **** on the steering wheel that you grabbed and rotated it with. It took some getting used to, but worked.
....Even back in the 60's, though, that problem was addressed by having a big **** on the steering wheel that you grabbed and rotated it with. It took some getting used to, but worked
The standard steering wheel will never be replaced. I'm very open minded but any other design doesn't make a bit of sense in comparison.
Think about an emergency maneuver situation. Do you think grabbing two small wheels such as these will keep you in control in a sudden maneuver? Or how about a joystick? No way. You need a FULL 360 degree wheel that you can grab any any point and with natural intuition that you don't need to think about. There's a reason all these concept steering controls never make it past the auto show floor.
Think about an emergency maneuver situation. Do you think grabbing two small wheels such as these will keep you in control in a sudden maneuver? Or how about a joystick? No way. You need a FULL 360 degree wheel that you can grab any any point and with natural intuition that you don't need to think about. There's a reason all these concept steering controls never make it past the auto show floor.
Oh, I know it is still in use, to a limited extent. But on most cars, today's advanced power-steering systems, steering-wheel designs, and suspensions have generally made it less necessary, even for handicapped people. Truckers, as you note, may be a different case.
Trending Topics
Think about an emergency maneuver situation. Do you think grabbing two small wheels such as these will keep you in control in a sudden maneuver? Or how about a joystick? No way. You need a FULL 360 degree wheel that you can grab any any point and with natural intuition that you don't need to think about. There's a reason all these concept steering controls never make it past the auto show floor.
Not so with joysticks....you can't manuver a 3500-lb car around with nothing but a 3 or 4-inch piece of plastic and no electronics.
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/1969895-post13.html
Honestly that steering wheel, really, was no bigger than what we have in our own cars. There are others that are wayyy bigger, and more "traditional" in size, but you can still spin them around with just the tip of your finger. Just depends on the model and make of truck I was driving. The pics in my thread are from a Freightliner Century class.
You are probably correct, but (partially) for different reasons....see the rest of my post below.
The REAL reason (and you have partially hit on it) that steer-by-wire systems have not gotten into production cars is the lawyers. Steer-by-wire systems pose a serious risk if they malfunction. If the engine stalls and/or conventional electric or hydraulic power-steering pump malfunctions, or a belt breaks, you still have SOME control over the vehicle, although the wheel may be quite difficult to move.
Not so with joysticks....you can't manuver a 3500-lb car around with nothing but a 3 or 4-inch piece of plastic and no electronics.
The REAL reason (and you have partially hit on it) that steer-by-wire systems have not gotten into production cars is the lawyers. Steer-by-wire systems pose a serious risk if they malfunction. If the engine stalls and/or conventional electric or hydraulic power-steering pump malfunctions, or a belt breaks, you still have SOME control over the vehicle, although the wheel may be quite difficult to move.
Not so with joysticks....you can't manuver a 3500-lb car around with nothing but a 3 or 4-inch piece of plastic and no electronics.
So that's TWO major reasons why we will never see the wheel replaced (as long as humans drive automobiles).
That's a very good point as well. Only a traditional wheel can provide mechanical safety backups (physical gears, ect.) while these other concepts rely completely on wires and electronics that do nothing when power is lost.
So that's TWO major reasons why we will never see the wheel replaced (as long as humans drive automobiles).
So that's TWO major reasons why we will never see the wheel replaced (as long as humans drive automobiles).
Last edited by mmarshall; Apr 12, 2009 at 10:41 PM.
That's a very good point as well. Only a traditional wheel can provide mechanical safety backups (physical gears, ect.) while these other concepts rely completely on wires and electronics that do nothing when power is lost.
So that's TWO major reasons why we will never see the wheel replaced (as long as humans drive automobiles).
So that's TWO major reasons why we will never see the wheel replaced (as long as humans drive automobiles).
I'd like to have a car with motorcycle controls. Hands are far more sensitive than feet for judging throttle position and braking a car with two fingers would be awesome. Oh, wait, we don't have an cable operated throttles anymore do we? It's all done electronically with pre-programmed profiles for response....gee, what will they think of next? Something more intuitive than a circular wheel that is a remnant of engineering requiring leverage for complex mechanical systems? I can't wait for the day the hardware is completely isolated from direct input by a software controlled hardware abstraction layer. Oh, yeah, that would be every modern PC operating system out there, huh....
You guys are really funny!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hoovey689
Car Chat
19
May 9, 2013 09:11 PM













