FD RX7 reliability?
Lexus Fanatic
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,576
Likes: 266
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Rotary engines have always had some issues. They have poor low-RPM torque, get poor gas mileage, use more oil on the average than conventional piston engines, have relatively weak apex-rotor seals (comparable to a conventional engine's piston rings), pollute a lot requiring a lot of emissions hardware, and, on carburated versions, sometimes have flooding issues on cold starts, creating big clouds of smoke. Parts for them can also be expensive because there relatively few places to get them. But they are small, light, help the car have ideal weight distribution and a low center of gravity for good handling, and rev almost as smoothly as an electric motor; virtually vibration-free.
Aside from that, later models of the RX-7 (the early 90's twin-turbo version) were very lightly constructed, with a lot of thin aluminum parts. They were known for being like a tin can, both in road noise because of lack of insulation and for bending and warping suspension/chassis parts on bumps and rough roads.
Aside from that, later models of the RX-7 (the early 90's twin-turbo version) were very lightly constructed, with a lot of thin aluminum parts. They were known for being like a tin can, both in road noise because of lack of insulation and for bending and warping suspension/chassis parts on bumps and rough roads.
Last edited by mmarshall; Jan 24, 2009 at 04:00 PM.
Haha rotary and reliability rarely go in the same sentence.
They require a lot of up keep, it burns through oil like no other, and you usually need to pop the hood and check up on things every few weeks.
They require a lot of up keep, it burns through oil like no other, and you usually need to pop the hood and check up on things every few weeks.
Lexus Test Driver
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,350
Likes: 1
From: Inside
i think the question needs to be
"how unreliable is a FD RX-7?"
As mmarshall mentioned, with the smoothness of the engine and its ability to develop large HP numbers with Turbos and whatnot, rotaries are rarely driven "quietly" so the apex seals tend to not hold up well...and that pretty much requires you get a new engine.
A friend of mine has had a FD RX-7 for about 2-3 years now, and is currently in the midst of putting in his second engine (it is also his second RX-7).
"how unreliable is a FD RX-7?"
As mmarshall mentioned, with the smoothness of the engine and its ability to develop large HP numbers with Turbos and whatnot, rotaries are rarely driven "quietly" so the apex seals tend to not hold up well...and that pretty much requires you get a new engine.
A friend of mine has had a FD RX-7 for about 2-3 years now, and is currently in the midst of putting in his second engine (it is also his second RX-7).
I have two friends, one who owns a FC (87') and the other a FD (93'). They are constantly wrenching but that's what they enjoy. Plus those are not their daily drivers. I wouldn't recommend you purchasing an FD if it's your daily driver. They are known for needing rebuilds before 100,000 miles.
Trending Topics
ClubLexus Stories
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
Top 10 Most Confusing Things Lexus Has Ever Done!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Lexus ES Review: Lexus Re-Embraces Founding Principles
Michael S. Palmer
10 Lexus Bargains That are Cheaper Than a New Toyota RAV4
Joe Kucinski
8 Weirdest Things Lexus Has Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
10 Lexus Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
8 Tips for Improving Your Hybrid or Plug-in Hybrid's Efficiency!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Best Lexus Models No One Remembers
Joe Kucinski
TRD Off-Road Premium: Best 2026 4Runner, Except This One Thing
Michael S. Palmer
Top 10 Lexus & Toyotas to Drive Before You Die!
Joe Kucinski
Lexus Fanatic
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 22,608
Likes: 105
From: Waiting for next track day
from what I know they are definetely not a very reliable motor. The new renesis motors are better, but still torqueless and no *****. Thats why the rx7 had a tubo. I think the new Renesis motors are outputting like total of 1.3 liters and make a monsterous 210-220 hp. My old civic was also 1.3 liter.
Last edited by I8ABMR; Jan 24, 2009 at 11:27 PM.
Lexus Fanatic
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 1
From: tech capital
Aside from that, later models of the RX-7 (the early 90's twin-turbo version) were very lightly constructed, with a lot of thin aluminum parts. They were known for being like a tin can, both in road noise because of lack of insulation and for bending and warping suspension/chassis parts on bumps and rough roads.
from what I know they are definetely not a very reliable motor. The new renesis motors are better, but still torqueless and no *****. Thats why the rx7 had a tubo. I think the new Renesis motors are outputting like total of 1.3 liters and make a monsterous 210-220 hp. My old civic was also 1.3 liter.
