Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

mark levinson v. buying aftermarket

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 06:34 AM
  #16  
Evitzee's Avatar
Evitzee
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,102
Likes: 8
From: Hill Country, TX
Default

Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
most people dont know how to appreciate good sound systems and therefore dont wwant to get the ML system over stock when deciding to buy a car. Lot of people think the stock is "good enough" Plus maybe it was a rarely allocated option like ML is on many current lexus vehicles.
+1 I think most people would pay $1k for the ML if it was available. But it is so hard to get that most don't have a choice unless they want to order the car, and most don't. So they get the stock unit and rationalize that it is 'good enough'. Lexus should really step up production of the ML system and make it more readily available. And dealers could help in this regard by ordering it for their in stock cars, and educating buyers on its benefits. One 10 minute test listen would persuade 95% of the buyers. It is a bargain.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 07:39 AM
  #17  
Threxx's Avatar
Threxx
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,474
Likes: 2
From: Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by jdoggg1



I could build you a competition level system for that much that would destroy a ML system, are you sure you're not thinking of BB/CC over priced crap?

Eclipse/Alpine/Nak head unit $1000
2x Zapco 2ch amp $1k
2 sets Focal 3way components $1k (OR 1set ID horn components + focal 3ways)
Wires, sound deadening, harnesses, misc. etc $500 (generous)
zapco 1100 watt mono amp $800
IDMAX sub + custom sealed enclosure $500
Audio control EQ (for the heck of it) $500


~$5500 And you have a system worthy of SQ competition.



Once again, i'm not arguing you that ML doesn't sound far and away better than any other dealer installed stereo... but it really depends on the person listening. The only limiting factor is the level of integration of the stock stereo with the cars computer systems.


$1k could get you 2 sets of mid level focal speakers, and an amp with the juice to drive them. But i'm used to a system with 1500 watts going to my subs, and 125watts going to each of my speakers... i like high quality music played LOUD.
I've owned 'competition level' systems.
Four problems:
-Cleanliness of install is usually nowhere near factory quality
-Expensive, more prone to reliability issues
-Taking the car apart... I dunno... something about the way it was assembled from the factory - all of the screws tightened just right, panels aligned by people who have been installing them for over a decade... I just trust that more than I do Mr stereo installer... even if Mr stereo installer is me.
-Sound stage may be fine on the competition level system for front seat passengers with 2 channel recordings, but good luck matching a Levinson setup for multichannel recordings and making every seat in the house a sweet spot.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 08:13 AM
  #18  
ff_'s Avatar
ff_
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by Evitzee
I think most people would pay $1k for the ML if it was available.
I have a feeling that you're probably right. I aspire to appreciate great recordings and quality sound systems, but given how little I drive (I don't have a daily commute to work), and given the fact that I always have at least one of our kids in the car, I couldn't see spending $1000's on the ML or any aftermarket system.

[edit]
And then you have people like my uncle, who owned an LS430 with ML, who never listened to anything but AM talk radio. he never understood "what so special about the ML sound system".
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 09:00 AM
  #19  
RA40's Avatar
RA40
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 20,895
Likes: 490
From: California
Default

My experience is that the ML is very musical and has a refined sound without being unbalanced. Low's, mid's and highs compliment each other. The sound stage within the car has definition and at the same time transparent. You can sit there, eye's closed and not pick which speaker is producing the section of music unless the track is recorded intentionally. In car audio, that wasn't a feat easily accomplished. You always knew where the speakers were.

I haven't heard the high end cars as MM mentioned, at a mass production level such as this, the ML is a kick butt system IMO. Even in the 430's...a very nice system.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 10:03 AM
  #20  
IronCobra's Avatar
IronCobra
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,407
Likes: 1
From: Texas
Default

I use to be an IASCA SQ+ judge for 3 years. I was also a Master MECP Installer for 2 custom shops and 1 chain.

When it comes to shear sound quality (Imaging, Staging, SNR, and Freq response) the ML system is far superior to just about any aftermarket system under $8,000 (or possibly more).

If you want Volume and Bass then yes, there are many "home built" systems that can out perform the ML system. That wasn't their intent to build a "rattle the trunk" system.

Regardless of brand, a speaker will sound like CRAP if the science of the enclosure isn't designed for that speaker and for the environment.

Focal, DynaAudio, Crystal Audio, Diamond Audio, JL, PG, and anything else isn't crap without someone who knows how to design the enclosures and knows placement.

Someone said $5500 for a comparable system? Heck no.. maybe for the equipment alone. You would need an EXPERT in Staging and fabrication to build it perfectly. That would be an additional $3k in design and fab time and materials.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 12:15 PM
  #21  
flblue's Avatar
flblue
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 38
Likes: 1
From: Fl
Default

Question then.

If you buy a car with stock stereo, is it possible to buy the ML head unit, speakers etc from a junked car and simply swap it all out?

Anybody done this and is it a simple swap? Simple unplug and plug from the stock to the ML set up?, then it would look stock. Or is it a totally different setup, size of speakers different etc?
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 12:58 PM
  #22  
Evitzee's Avatar
Evitzee
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,102
Likes: 8
From: Hill Country, TX
Default

Originally Posted by flblue
Question then.

If you buy a car with stock stereo, is it possible to buy the ML head unit, speakers etc from a junked car and simply swap it all out?

Anybody done this and is it a simple swap? Simple unplug and plug from the stock to the ML set up?, then it would look stock. Or is it a totally different setup, size of speakers different etc?
Speakers are all different, amp is different. It's not a plug n' play setup. I suppose anything is possible, but probably not something that is realistic from a dollar perspective.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 01:23 PM
  #23  
OC 335d's Avatar
OC 335d
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 1
From: CA
Default

Too bad we couldn't find ML in any of the IS250s we were shopping for. We were looking for White/Cashmere/Auto/Luxury Package/Nav/ML.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 03:33 PM
  #24  
T0ked's Avatar
T0ked
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 3
From: New York
Default

Agreed. The ML system is not about over the top SPLs and thumping bass. The precision with which they engineered the system, all the parts together to reproduce sound, just cannot be done for a couple of $k. Louder doesn't mean better. Just replacing stockers with MB Quarts and replacing the amp with aftermarket ones won't make it a better system. It's like getting a turbo for your car. It will fun faster, but it won't run better than stock, not until you do a lot of tuning and that requires knowledge and special tools (and $$$).

My friend had MBQuarts and PPI amps in his Legend back in the day and it went loud, real loud and distortion free, too, at those volumes. The Nakamichi in my car was loud enough for me, but the imaging soundstage and clarity of the stock Nak system was still unmatched by my friend's "pro" system. I've come to appreciate the certain nuances of music that is apparent in well calibrated high end audio.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 04:02 PM
  #25  
Och's Avatar
Och
Lexus Champion
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 17,029
Likes: 246
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by IronCobra
I use to be an IASCA SQ+ judge for 3 years. I was also a Master MECP Installer for 2 custom shops and 1 chain.

When it comes to shear sound quality (Imaging, Staging, SNR, and Freq response) the ML system is far superior to just about any aftermarket system under $8,000 (or possibly more).

If you want Volume and Bass then yes, there are many "home built" systems that can out perform the ML system. That wasn't their intent to build a "rattle the trunk" system.

Regardless of brand, a speaker will sound like CRAP if the science of the enclosure isn't designed for that speaker and for the environment.

Focal, DynaAudio, Crystal Audio, Diamond Audio, JL, PG, and anything else isn't crap without someone who knows how to design the enclosures and knows placement.

Someone said $5500 for a comparable system? Heck no.. maybe for the equipment alone. You would need an EXPERT in Staging and fabrication to build it perfectly. That would be an additional $3k in design and fab time and materials.
I couldn't put it better, agree 100%. Also, $1000 budget will not even match the standard Lexus audio sustem, never mind ML.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gs350fan
GS - 3rd Gen (2006-2011)
8
Mar 31, 2018 05:55 AM
aftab242
ES - 1st to 6th Gen (1990-2018)
2
Apr 17, 2014 10:07 PM
bobinsofla
GX - 1st Gen (2003-2009)
3
Jun 6, 2008 04:10 PM
ghollett1
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
1
Oct 8, 2007 11:37 AM
Grush
Lexus Audio, Video, Security & Electronics
6
Mar 2, 2001 08:03 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:36 AM.