New game: Lexus trivia
Because Americans are greedy with the mentality of bigger is better. The 2.0L i-4 3S-GE from the Altezza and the 2.0L 1G-FE from the IS200 wasn't powerful enough to satisfy US consumers. Lexus opted to go with the 3.0L 2JZ-GE. It was a motor that was to rival the 3 series' I-6. The critics of the Altezza said the vehicle's chassis needed a more powerful motor. Ironically, the 2JZ-GE was supposed to be the answer for the critics, but in my opinion...it still lacks.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Because Americans are greedy with the mentality of bigger is better. The 2.0L i-4 3S-GE from the Altezza and the 2.0L 1G-FE from the IS200 wasn't powerful enough to satisfy US consumers. Lexus opted to go with the 3.0L 2JZ-GE. It was a motor that was to rival the 3 series' I-6. The critics of the Altezza said the vehicle's chassis needed a more powerful motor. Ironically, the 2JZ-GE was supposed to be the answer for the critics, but in my opinion...it still lacks.
The 2.0 1G-FE made 200hp peak no?
Actually it's bigger by 14%. 14.8 cubic feet vs. 13.0 cubic feet because Lexus engineers were able to maximize space from the longer wheelbase, compact suspension and fuel tank design.
Because Americans are greedy with the mentality of bigger is better. The 2.0L i-4 3S-GE from the Altezza and the 2.0L 1G-FE from the IS200 wasn't powerful enough to satisfy US consumers. Lexus opted to go with the 3.0L 2JZ-GE. It was a motor that was to rival the 3 series' I-6. The critics of the Altezza said the vehicle's chassis needed a more powerful motor. Ironically, the 2JZ-GE was supposed to be the answer for the critics, but in my opinion...it still lacks.
Because Americans are greedy with the mentality of bigger is better. The 2.0L i-4 3S-GE from the Altezza and the 2.0L 1G-FE from the IS200 wasn't powerful enough to satisfy US consumers. Lexus opted to go with the 3.0L 2JZ-GE. It was a motor that was to rival the 3 series' I-6. The critics of the Altezza said the vehicle's chassis needed a more powerful motor. Ironically, the 2JZ-GE was supposed to be the answer for the critics, but in my opinion...it still lacks.
You can't just blame the engine, whether it is a GE or any other, for a lack of power. Transmission design, ratios, final-drive design and ratios, how the engine computer and fuel injection is programmed, emissions, how much drag the drivetrain places on the engine, aerodynamics....all of this plays a part in what 0-60 times will be.
Good case in point: I remember driving a base-model 1997 Tercel with a 1.5L 92 HP engine and a three-speed automatic. Because of the way it was geared and the final-drive ratio, It would spurt right off the line faster than some of today's V6s, say up to about 30 MPH or so......but then, of course, the engine would run out of steam ( and RPMs ) above 45 or so and it would then be like a slug.











