2006 Eclipse
Looks like something a kid would drive.
Thats what it is
I'd look for some spoiled teenage girls to be driving around in this (pardon my stereotype, its the truth around these parts). Maybe even a few guys who see it as a car with a good amount of power and pep and don't mind the styling. I'm not a big fan of the styling, but in black with that kit could look OK. I still think it's destined to be like the previous Eclipse, for young female drivers.
-Annant
Trending Topics
http://www.mitsubishicars.com/eclips...ery.html?g=int
I do not recommend this car, quality-wise. I have inspected and driven a number of both new and used ones and have not been impressed with them. Eclipses in general have a poor quality and reliability record, partially do to a number of different problems at the Diamond Star plant in Normal, IL where they are built, but also the fact that many of them were driven very hard by their owners....especially the second-generation 4-cylinder Turbo models. Many Mitsubishi engines also tend to start having upper-block problems like head gaskets, valves, etc....after 70,000-80,000 miles no matter how they are driven.
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
M.
http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/2006...dersneak1.html
Last edited by mmarshall; Jul 31, 2005 at 01:22 PM.
I've never been impressed with either the Chrysler Cirrus/Dodge Stratus or Mitsubishi's Eclipse.
Would you say it's a problem at the plant that keeps the quality of these vehicles low or the engineering?
M.
I've never been impressed with either the Chrysler Cirrus/Dodge Stratus or Mitsubishi's Eclipse.
Would you say it's a problem at the plant that keeps the quality of these vehicles low or the engineering?
M.
Many of the other problems with the vehicles produced at the Diamond-Star plant, IMO opinion, can be traced simply to poor management there and the poor quality of the manufacturing process there. For instance, in 1995, when the notoriously poorly-built second-generation Eclipse ( and Eagle Talon ) was introduced, I can remember seeing burrs and defects in the paint which obviously came from not keeping dirt and airborne particles out of the paint rooms; squeaks and rattles, leaks, body parts that did not fit, etc..... Much of the hardware would work loose after a few years, like switches, handles, etc...
And, on a social and human note, there have been a number of personnel-related problems at that plant....things like drunkenness, drug use, a sexual-harassment suit that Mitsubishi paid a large sum to settle, and a racial suit that I don't remember the outcome of.
It would be fair to note, however, that the plant has shown some improvement lately, and 3rd-generation Eclipse, which dropped the Turbo 4 and AWD, was somewhat of an improvement, quality-wise, over the defect-ridden second-generation model even though it alienated a lot of the hard-core Turbo and AWD fans.....who naturally gravitated to the Evo. I still think, though, that the Eclipse even today is a somewhat risky purchase and do not recommend it for those who place reliability as an important factor.
Last edited by mmarshall; Jul 31, 2005 at 03:27 PM.










