Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

The Next Mercedes CLK CGI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2005 | 11:46 AM
  #1  
Gojirra99's Avatar
Gojirra99
Thread Starter
CL Community Team
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 30,277
Likes: 354
From: Canada
Default The Next Mercedes CLK CGI

Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 12:50 PM
  #2  
rominl's Avatar
rominl
exclusive matchup
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 81,869
Likes: 463
From: Lovely OC
Default

umm seems like that's the new headlight trends for mb huh? not too bad i think
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 01:11 PM
  #3  
Richie's Avatar
Richie
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 19,103
Likes: 2
From: Netherlands
Default

I'm not feeling those headlights.
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 03:18 PM
  #4  
GFerg's Avatar
GFerg
Speaks French in Russian
CL Folding 25,000
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,397
Likes: 100
From: What is G?
Default

Forget the headlights, the entire car looks bad. I personally dont care to much about the other MB models except for the CLK and SL. Now they went and messed up this car. Im going to be real upset if the actual car has a hint of similarity to this monstrosity.

Whats the deal with MB lately?? Their cars are getting real ugly all of a sudden. The new ML-class isnt much to look at, the R-class looks like a big minivan that cost 50K+, then we get the S-class pics, and now this!!! What is going on?? They have a Bangle equivalent over there??
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 04:44 PM
  #5  
BlkGS3's Avatar
BlkGS3
Lexus Champion
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

its a freaking BMW 6-Series.....Sweet non the less
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 05:27 PM
  #6  
jet864's Avatar
jet864
Pole Position
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,056
Likes: 0
From: Washington
Default

Why so soon? The new body just came out in '04 and the 'vert is new for '05 (my mom got her '05 coupe in August of '04 though) but in regards to model year, is it really necessary for an upgrade already? Does the public really have that sort of demand for new cars every 3-4 years? Jeez, it's getting like computers where as soon as you think you have the best, something new, faster, and better comes out.

James
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 05:39 PM
  #7  
MugenRD1's Avatar
MugenRD1
Rookie
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

The current CLK model W209 came out in 2003.

Should be a few more years before a model change.
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 06:01 PM
  #8  
Gojirra99's Avatar
Gojirra99
Thread Starter
CL Community Team
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 30,277
Likes: 354
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by jet864
Why so soon? The new body just came out in '04 and the 'vert is new for '05 (my mom got her '05 coupe in August of '04 though) but in regards to model year, is it really necessary for an upgrade already? Does the public really have that sort of demand for new cars every 3-4 years? Jeez, it's getting like computers where as soon as you think you have the best, something new, faster, and better comes out.

James
I don't think we're going to see a new CLK in a few years, but undoubtedly, they are already working on the next generation soon after the current generation came out in 2003.
For example, the CGI of the next S class from autobild that I posted in the "Uncomouflaged S class" thread has already been out for almost 2 years, & it looks like they look quite close to the real one from the pics.
Nobody knows whether the next CLK is going to look like these CGI's for sure, but based on my observations of autobild's CGI's (the S class, CL class, as well as the 3 series & 6 series) they seem to have a pretty good idea of what they're doing & their pics usually looks pretty close to the real cars that are eventually unveiled.
Maybe the Germans are not as secretive about their designs as the Japanese manufacturers, but the Japanese' mags renditions don't come nearly as close to the real cars.
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 09:30 PM
  #9  
O. L. T.'s Avatar
O. L. T.
Keeper of the light
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 34,122
Likes: 485
From: My little world
Default

Kinda resembles a fast moving turd. Just peeled itself back a bit on the run
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 09:33 PM
  #10  
AJL0365's Avatar
AJL0365
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
Default

i kinda in a lil bit sorta way like it, but i rather have the current generation CLK more
Reply
Old May 14, 2005 | 09:20 AM
  #11  
amy011079's Avatar
amy011079
Lexus Test Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,549
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Default

looks much better then the new S-class. but i'd take the SL65 over all MB though.
Reply
Old May 14, 2005 | 10:25 AM
  #12  
GS3Tek's Avatar
GS3Tek
CL Community Team
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,390
Likes: 184
From: so cal
Default

They're using the CLS lamp style and losing their quad-lamp trademark
Reply
Old May 14, 2005 | 03:56 PM
  #13  
Iceman's Avatar
Iceman
Pole Position
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,221
Likes: 2
From: CA
Default

Just take a quick glance at that first model (the sky-blue one) and tell me if you don't think it's a G35.

MB had a great run there in the late 90's/early 00's when they had (IMO) the best-looking lineup of cars on the road. The new generation of vehicles is not nearly as eye-catching or well-done, but not as much of an abomination as the new BMWs.

It's interesting to me that the latest Japanese designs (the RL, M35/45, and GS) all have very similar design cues and features. None of them is a stunner, but they all look, well... GOOD. The Germans appear to be trying so hard to be "different" that they just come out looking off somehow.
Reply
Old May 15, 2005 | 12:18 AM
  #14  
jet864's Avatar
jet864
Pole Position
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,056
Likes: 0
From: Washington
Default

Originally Posted by MugenRD1
The current CLK model W209 came out in 2003.

Should be a few more years before a model change.
Yeah my bad, I'm off by one year across the board. I hope they give it a few years still though.

James
Reply
Old May 15, 2005 | 01:29 PM
  #15  
XeroK00L's Avatar
XeroK00L
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,813
Likes: 1
From: The Bay Area, CA, USA
Default

Originally Posted by magneto112
Forget the headlights, the entire car looks bad. I personally dont care to much about the other MB models except for the CLK and SL. Now they went and messed up this car. Im going to be real upset if the actual car has a hint of similarity to this monstrosity.

Whats the deal with MB lately?? Their cars are getting real ugly all of a sudden. The new ML-class isnt much to look at, the R-class looks like a big minivan that cost 50K+, then we get the S-class pics, and now this!!! What is going on?? They have a Bangle equivalent over there??
I really hope they stick to the tried-and-true quad-oval headlamps for starters. Their new designs aren't necessarily ugly but are simply a far cry from their current models.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:54 PM.