Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

ALG Depreciation Ratings (based on 2004 models)

Old 12-09-04, 08:59 AM
  #1  
IsraelRX
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
IsraelRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default ALG Depreciation Ratings (based on 2004 models)

Discuss...

http://www.alg.com/news-inform...tings









IsraelRX is offline  
Old 12-09-04, 09:09 AM
  #2  
LexusLuver
Lexus Test Driver
 
LexusLuver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: ALG Depreciation Ratings (based on 2004 models)

Originally posted by IsraelRX
Discuss...

I think we already discussed last yrs results.
LexusLuver is offline  
Old 12-09-04, 01:13 PM
  #3  
Cobra V
Driver
 
Cobra V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Toyota owns the 5 star category
Cobra V is offline  
Old 12-09-04, 01:23 PM
  #4  
qtb33
Lead Lap
 
qtb33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

HA! What is there to discuss? Lexus placed a huge majority of its cars in the 5 star and toyota did at least 90% in the 4-5 star catagory. Thats including the Scions.

I think that speaks louder than any words
qtb33 is offline  
Old 12-09-04, 02:11 PM
  #5  
jet864
Lexus Champion
 
jet864's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Washington
Posts: 3,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No surprise there for the Toyota family. Frankly I'm surprised by Volvo though. I figured they'd be pretty low and the the XC90 would be HIGHER than the others.

James
jet864 is offline  
Old 12-09-04, 02:17 PM
  #6  
XeroK00L
Lexus Fanatic
 
XeroK00L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Bay Area, CA, USA
Posts: 5,813
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by Cobra V
Toyota owns the 5 star category
XeroK00L is offline  
Old 12-09-04, 03:20 PM
  #7  
GRAND_LS 4
3UZ-FEEEE
iTrader: (2)
 
GRAND_LS 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 6,251
Received 17 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

The LS430 Didnt do so well
GRAND_LS 4 is offline  
Old 12-09-04, 03:27 PM
  #8  
CK6Speed
Super Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
CK6Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: HI
Posts: 7,719
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by GRAND_LS 4
The LS430 Didnt do so well
I found that to be a bit suprising myself, but I guess a reality. Just looking at the local papers I see equal year LS400/430s selling for the same price if not sometimes lower than equal year GS430s, and in the earlier years SC400s.

Another thing I find interesting is in the 5 star line up most are SUV/Trucks or Minivans. Of the 6 Toyota vehicles 5 are SUV/Trucks. I find it hard to believe the Celica has that good a market value as well or at least better than a Camry. Half the 5 Star Lexus line up is SUVs as well.

Last edited by CK6Speed; 12-09-04 at 03:31 PM.
CK6Speed is offline  
Old 12-09-04, 03:29 PM
  #9  
XeroK00L
Lexus Fanatic
 
XeroK00L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Bay Area, CA, USA
Posts: 5,813
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by GRAND_LS 4
The LS430 Didnt do so well
Neither do any of the other flagship sedans.
It seems to be always true that the higher the price, the higher the depreciation.

Last edited by XeroK00L; 12-09-04 at 03:30 PM.
XeroK00L is offline  
Old 12-09-04, 03:34 PM
  #10  
CK6Speed
Super Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
CK6Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: HI
Posts: 7,719
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by XeroK00L
Neither do any of the other flagship sedans.
It seems to be always true that the higher the price, the higher the depreciation.
Except for the Acura RL which is actually a little suprising considering it is the 2004 model and not the new 05. Looking at used car prices I have noticed that even though the 3rd Gen RL was no real competition it seems to have a good resale value. The car itself was build very solid, it just didn't have a strong enough engine to compete.
CK6Speed is offline  
Old 12-09-04, 04:33 PM
  #11  
Iceman
Lexus Champion
 
Iceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by CK6Speed
The car itself was build very solid, it just didn't have a strong enough engine to compete.
You've got THAT right. The RL was a fantastic luxury cruiser, loaded with features and comfy luxury. It stickered at a very reasonable price and was then discounted heavily due to poor sales. The RL ages well (rock-solid construction), and the sliver of the market who appreciates it for what it is was enough to keep depreciation low.
Iceman is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gojirra99
Car Chat
22
07-09-04 01:51 PM
LexusLuver
Car Chat
14
07-05-04 09:02 AM
tetra7
Car Chat
24
06-29-04 11:25 AM
LexusLuver
Car Chat
13
04-26-04 11:22 AM
ebruce2
Car Chat
22
02-21-04 10:57 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: ALG Depreciation Ratings (based on 2004 models)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:54 AM.