Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

Self-Driving Vehicles

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 17, 2017 | 06:09 AM
  #316  
geko29's Avatar
geko29
CL Community Team
15 Year Member
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,299
Likes: 580
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by comotiger
Just imagine, if a hacker were able to mess with the brakes or steering in a moving car, even if the engine cannot be shut off, that would be disastrous!
Who has to imagine? Remote exploits were successfully demonstrated two years ago that enabled attackers to disable the brakes and transmission or shut off the car (among dozens of less-deadly things like controlling the radio and wipers) from hundreds of miles away.

That hole has been plugged (on vehicles that have the update, which takes 45 minutes to manually apply via a thumbdrive), but the same researchers demonstrated last year that far more invasive control is possible, with the right access. Right now they have to be physically connected to the car to do so, but it's just another cellular/WiFi exploit or poorly secured insurance company dongle away from elevating back to remote control.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2017 | 06:35 AM
  #317  
comotiger's Avatar
comotiger
Pole Position
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,598
Likes: 300
From: Missouri
Default

The security risks to semi-autonomous and fully-autonomous driving vehicles are huge. But engineers and scientists are pretty smart. They will come up with solutions that will work 99% of the time. For the doubters, remember no system is perfect. Even now, several thousand people die on our roads every year from distracted driving and or from making mistakes due to inexperienced driving. The same will hold true for autonomous vehicles (i.e., accidents will happen but fatalities will be far fewer). One can never plan or predict every possible scenario. But these AI systems will learn and improve.

To Och's points about inaccurate GPS, sure there will be situations where GPS signals won't be good, and you won't use the fully autonomous driving mode. Then again, vehicles use other methods to locate in dense urban environments, not just GPS, and cities and automakers are embedding other technologies into our infrastructure to address these concerns.

So, autonomous vehicles may not fully supplant human drivers in 16 years. But it is likely that a significant fraction of vehicles in the first world will be autonomous. Due to this and other developments in ride sharing and public transport, I wouldn't be surprised if most 16 year-olds in the US haven't learned to drive in 2033.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2017 | 07:26 AM
  #318  
plex's Avatar
plex
1UZFE/2JZGTE
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,273
Likes: 76
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by comotiger
The security risks to semi-autonomous and fully-autonomous driving vehicles are huge. But engineers and scientists are pretty smart. They will come up with solutions that will work 99% of the time. For the doubters, remember no system is perfect. Even now, several thousand people die on our roads every year from distracted driving and or from making mistakes due to inexperienced driving. The same will hold true for autonomous vehicles (i.e., accidents will happen but fatalities will be far fewer). One can never plan or predict every possible scenario. But these AI systems will learn and improve.

To Och's points about inaccurate GPS, sure there will be situations where GPS signals won't be good, and you won't use the fully autonomous driving mode. Then again, vehicles use other methods to locate in dense urban environments, not just GPS, and cities and automakers are embedding other technologies into our infrastructure to address these concerns.

So, autonomous vehicles may not fully supplant human drivers in 16 years. But it is likely that a significant fraction of vehicles in the first world will be autonomous. Due to this and other developments in ride sharing and public transport, I wouldn't be surprised if most 16 year-olds in the US haven't learned to drive in 2033.
Great points. A large percentage of human drivers will get distracted at some point while the autonomous vehicles won't. AI systems are constantly learning and improving at almost a scary rate. Correct on infrastructure roads can have digital way points of sorts that devices/vehicles check in to or ping on a route. Those points can be used to gather other analytics also combine that with smart IP cameras and possibilities seem endless. Internet of Things (IOT) will go far beyond just smart devices like phones or cameras.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2017 | 08:07 AM
  #319  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,374
Likes: 3,779
Default

if you think drivers are distracted now, wait until they're wearing VR headsets.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2017 | 11:22 AM
  #320  
Aron9000's Avatar
Aron9000
Lexus Champion
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,592
Likes: 30
From: TN
Default

Also you all need to drive into some of the more rural parts of this country. They don't have $$$$$ for new cars, much less self driving cars. Everybody is driving some piece of junk that's at least 10, if not 15 or 20 years old. 16 year olds in that part of the country need to learn how to drive because there is no uber, no trains, cars are the only way to get around. Even if they don't get a car of their own right when they get their license at 16, they'll have one by the time they're 18 or 19, and it will most likely be OLD because that's all they can afford.

Also I don't think car makers like Ford(or even a progressive company like Tesla) are going to build entirely autonomous vehicles because they would be the ones left holding the liability bag when it crashes, not the driver like it is today. The potential liability to the car maker would be so high it could potentially bankrupt them.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2017 | 12:12 PM
  #321  
Och's Avatar
Och
Lexus Champion
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,759
Likes: 131
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by Aron9000
Also you all need to drive into some of the more rural parts of this country. They don't have $$$$$ for new cars, much less self driving cars. Everybody is driving some piece of junk that's at least 10, if not 15 or 20 years old. 16 year olds in that part of the country need to learn how to drive because there is no uber, no trains, cars are the only way to get around. Even if they don't get a car of their own right when they get their license at 16, they'll have one by the time they're 18 or 19, and it will most likely be OLD because that's all they can afford.
Exactly. And try other countries, where people are lucky to be able to afford a beat up scooter, much less a car.

This whole self driving car lunacy only works in a perfect world, where the car is brand new with zero mechanical wear and all electronics and computers are in perfect working order, somewhere in a sunny part of California on a road specifically built for self driving cars to take 45 year old lumbersexual hipsters to pick up beard oil from a dedicated Whole Foods store while sipping on their glutten free kale latte paid for by mommy and daddy. In the real world - not so much.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2017 | 12:43 PM
  #322  
plex's Avatar
plex
1UZFE/2JZGTE
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,273
Likes: 76
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by Och
Exactly. And try other countries, where people are lucky to be able to afford a beat up scooter, much less a car.

This whole self driving car lunacy only works in a perfect world, where the car is brand new with zero mechanical wear and all electronics and computers are in perfect working order, somewhere in a sunny part of California on a road specifically built for self driving cars to take 45 year old lumbersexual hipsters to pick up beard oil from a dedicated Whole Foods store while sipping on their glutten free kale latte paid for by mommy and daddy. In the real world - not so much.
You seem upset lol. It will obviously start in CA and make it's way to other states as long as the states approve the use of these vehicles it's not going to be instant country wide or global for that matter. Some countries may never have them at all. There is no perfect world, why such hate and resistance to inevitable technology?
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2017 | 01:30 PM
  #323  
riredale's Avatar
riredale
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 857
Likes: 47
From: Oregon
Default

Yeah, I could see certain roads (freeways in particular) that were populated by autonomous cars. But too many variables on regular city streets PLUS the litigation possibilities.

Reminds me of the zoomy illustrations of flying cars from the 50's. It demonstrates that just because someone can think up something doesn't make it practical. Remember the flying car concept by a guy named Moeller (I think that's how it was spelled). What a crock, yet the guy got lots of coverage.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2017 | 01:58 PM
  #324  
RocketGuy3's Avatar
RocketGuy3
Racer
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Fizzboy7
Possibly. Possibly not. It is like today's youth generation being raised on cell phones and ipods. Little interaction with the outside world, less speech skills, less social skills, stunted emotional skills, less survival and independent skills. Driving is similar, in that you gain skills and strengths that you cannot gain elsewhere in the real world. That is truly a pity. Today's young generation is not better off in many regards. I see this in my work profession daily. We sell products that are hands on and do not give instant gratification. Kids 20 years ago loved it, now today don't get it.
First of all, my apologies for coming off a little more condescending and snarky than I intended to there... It's a problem I have on forums. Especially after a happy hour and a rough day, heh.

I agree that people have an increasing dependence on technology, and some have cell phone/technology addictions, too. The latter I hope we can do something about, but the former is already an irreversible trend, and one that I'm mostly OK with. Yeah, if the earth is ever hit with giant EMP, we're all pretty much screwed, save for the small percentage of people living off the grid, but as technology continues to improve, it's only natural to become increasingly dependent on it, and for the most part, I think it does better our lives and free up more time for us to enjoy ourselves or pursue productive interests.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2017 | 02:16 PM
  #325  
jadu's Avatar
jadu
live.love.laugh.lexus
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 11,581
Likes: 90
From: CALI
Default

Originally Posted by PhilipMSPT
It's 2017.

Fast forward to 2033. Kids born in 2017 will be 16 years old.

Will they still have the need to learn how to drive a car? Or will autonomous driving be prevalent?
my son is 1 and my daughter is 7. I showed my daughter how to change oil on a car the other day and I do intend to teach them both how to drive a car, how to drive one with manual gearbox as well as proper driving etiquette
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2017 | 02:18 PM
  #326  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,208
Likes: 220
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by jadu
my son is 1 and my daughter is 7. I showed my daughter how to change oil on a car the other day and I do intend to teach them both how to drive a car, how to drive one with manual gearbox as well as proper driving etiquette
What are you going to teach them on...........a Mazda Miata? It's getting harder and harder to find traditional 3-pedal manuals today....even a lot of Miatas are sold with automatics LOL.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2017 | 02:31 PM
  #327  
jadu's Avatar
jadu
live.love.laugh.lexus
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 11,581
Likes: 90
From: CALI
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
What are you going to teach them on...........a Mazda Miata? It's getting harder and harder to find traditional 3-pedal manuals today....even a lot of Miatas are sold with automatics LOL.
I was told 2JZ's last forever! You are right; they are getting scarce. However, I'm confident there will be manuals around. supras, soarers, sc300s, s13's, s14's, z32's, z33's, civics, miatas, s2ks, sti's, brz's, toyota minitrucks and tacomas all have a cult following. These cars are built, crashed, parted out, and rebuilt again. I'm sure I'll have no problem finding a suitable candidate
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2017 | 02:31 PM
  #328  
PhilipMSPT's Avatar
PhilipMSPT
Cycle Savant
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 21,528
Likes: 9
From: In rehab...
Default

Originally Posted by jadu
my son is 1 and my daughter is 7. I showed my daughter how to change oil on a car the other day and I do intend to teach them both how to drive a car, how to drive one with manual gearbox as well as proper driving etiquette
Originally Posted by mmarshall
What are you going to teach them on...........a Mazda Miata?
There's always motorcycles.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2017 | 02:41 PM
  #329  
jadu's Avatar
jadu
live.love.laugh.lexus
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 11,581
Likes: 90
From: CALI
Default

Originally Posted by PhilipMSPT
There's always motorcycles.
yep. my dad and sister ride (honda shadow and grom)
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2017 | 03:11 PM
  #330  
PhilipMSPT's Avatar
PhilipMSPT
Cycle Savant
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 21,528
Likes: 9
From: In rehab...
Default

Originally Posted by jadu
yep. my dad and sister ride (honda shadow and grom)

GROM!!!


Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:31 AM.