Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

Once you go LS could you ever go back?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 3, 2025 | 12:21 PM
  #91  
Striker223's Avatar
Striker223
Lexus Champion
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 18,346
Likes: 1,795
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
Having gone from NA engines to turbo engines, its hard to go back from a performance standpoint from my own experience. Every engine today uses synthetic oil, oil change intervals are the same. The LS requires premium fuel anyways.

Once you get used to the low end power from a turbocharged engine even high power NA engines feel lethargic.
Yep, as long as the boost is there it's great. Best option is an FI 12 though lol! Off boost those things hit as hard as a TTV8 and boost comes in insanely early
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2025 | 02:00 PM
  #92  
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
FrankReynoldsCPA
Lexus Test Driver
15 Year Member
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,398
Likes: 362
From: Las Vegas
Default

I use synthetic oil in my NA V8 anyway. I have let it run longer intervals (10k) than my BMW(5k), but I wouldn't let oil changes be the reason not to get a turbocharged car.

I love my truck to death, always will, but there's something about the instant torque in my car that makes me feel lacking when I have to wring out the Coyote for torque comparatively.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2025 | 03:19 PM
  #93  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,503
Likes: 261
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by Striker223
You should still use 93 if possible, the knock values don't lie....
On most modern engines, rhe computer retards the timing if it detects knock from low octane. Granted, that lowers power and sometimes adds heat, but it prevents piston damage.

I can't say about where you live in Ohio, but, in the D.C. area, there is a BIG difference between 87 and 93 octane on one's wallet.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2025 | 03:25 PM
  #94  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,503
Likes: 261
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
Having gone from NA engines to turbo engines, its hard to go back from a performance standpoint from my own experience. Every engine today uses synthetic oil, oil change intervals are the same. The LS requires premium fuel anyways.

Once you get used to the low end power from a turbocharged engine even high power NA engines feel lethargic.

Interesting. Many commenters, even here in Car Chat, feel the opposite. They dislike turbo-lag even with more power, and comment on how NA engines have quicker and more linear response. That is, of course, if instant power is one's cup of tea. I myself don't care, either way, with my conservative driving style....I've never had a vehicle with either a turbo or NA powerplant that I thought was underpowered, with one possible exception...my 2006 Outback. The NA 2.5L flat-four and 4-speed automatic, hooked to AWD, was (borderline) underpowered....but it was absolutely unstoppable on winter roads.

Last edited by mmarshall; Dec 3, 2025 at 03:26 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2025 | 03:34 PM
  #95  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,807
Likes: 4,095
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Interesting. Many commenters, even here in Car Chat, feel the opposite. They dislike turbo-lag even with more power, and comment on how NA engines have quicker and more linear response. That is, of course, if instant power is one's cup of tea. I myself don't care, either way, with my conservative driving style....I've never had a vehicle with either a turbo or NA powerplant that I thought was underpowered, with one possible exception...my 2006 Outback. The NA 2.5L flat-four and 4-speed automatic, hooked to AWD, was (borderline) underpowered....but it was absolutely unstoppable on winter roads.
You're reading different posts than I am. People who feel that way are overwhelmingly owners of NA engines lol. Those of us who have actually gone to FI engines overwhelmingly like them, three of them have replied the same in this very thread. Turbo lag isn't an issue in modern engines really.

When you get used to all the power available at 2,000 RPM in a FI engine, going back to having to wring one out to 5,000 RPM to get it makes them feel lethargic.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2025 | 03:46 PM
  #96  
Striker223's Avatar
Striker223
Lexus Champion
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 18,346
Likes: 1,795
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
On most modern engines, rhe computer retards the timing if it detects knock from low octane. Granted, that lowers power and sometimes adds heat, but it prevents piston damage.

I can't say about where you live in Ohio, but, in the D.C. area, there is a BIG difference between 87 and 93 octane on one's wallet.
Correct, the computer is forced to ride the knock sensors and REACT to knock that is damaging the rings. On higher octane there is no timing pull because there is no low level knock to detect and correct for



Price difference here is not the best but I have a dozen customers who switched to 93 and it gained them 5-8mpg and no more oil consumption

Last edited by Striker223; Dec 3, 2025 at 03:47 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2025 | 03:49 PM
  #97  
Stroock639's Avatar
Stroock639
Lexus Test Driver
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 6,275
Likes: 482
From: Long Island
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
You're reading different posts than I am. People who feel that way are overwhelmingly owners of NA engines lol. Those of us who have actually gone to FI engines overwhelmingly like them, three of them have replied the same in this very thread. Turbo lag isn't an issue in modern engines really.

When you get used to all the power available at 2,000 RPM in a FI engine, going back to having to wring one out to 5,000 RPM to get it makes them feel lethargic.
as someone with both they each have their desirable characteristics

the 1UZ revs beautifully and has a lovely linear power delivery, the M113K is just an absolute brute and delivers more fun for more of the time... i agree driving the LS after the E55 it does feel unusually sluggish, but that last 1500 rpm is just glorious and (not to sound too much like clarkson) no regular turbo engine can deliver the emotion or wonderful intake noise that winding out a high strung n/a engine can
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2025 | 03:56 PM
  #98  
Striker223's Avatar
Striker223
Lexus Champion
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 18,346
Likes: 1,795
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
You're reading different posts than I am. People who feel that way are overwhelmingly owners of NA engines lol. Those of us who have actually gone to FI engines overwhelmingly like them, three of them have replied the same in this very thread. Turbo lag isn't an issue in modern engines really.

When you get used to all the power available at 2,000 RPM in a FI engine, going back to having to wring one out to 5,000 RPM to get it makes them feel lethargic.
I love having an NA engine that hits 430lb/ft at 1200rpm but stuff like that is in the extreme minority, of all my V8s the TT one is the best by far for that low end punch.

Sure I can find the lag if I want to but at the end of the day a TTV8 off boost for a half second is just what an NA V8 is stuck with its whole RPM band. The LS460 literally feels like something is wrong with it when I drive it lol!
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2025 | 04:06 PM
  #99  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,807
Likes: 4,095
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by Stroock639
as someone with both they each have their desirable characteristics

the 1UZ revs beautifully and has a lovely linear power delivery, the M113K is just an absolute brute and delivers more fun for more of the time... i agree driving the LS after the E55 it does feel unusually sluggish, but that last 1500 rpm is just glorious and (not to sound too much like clarkson) no regular turbo engine can deliver the emotion or wonderful intake noise that winding out a high strung n/a engine can
Exactly

For day to day driving where you aren't winding the engine out its hard to go back. In the Pacifica we have the hybrid battery assist which really boosts the power down low compared with the NA V6, so while not FI it has some of the same characteristics, and now whenever I drive anything NA (most recently even the 6.2L V8 Yukon) it feels very heavy and lethargic in day to day driving. When you're used to beating anything off from a light with 1/3rd to 1/2 throttle its hard to go back.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2025 | 06:17 PM
  #100  
Stroock639's Avatar
Stroock639
Lexus Test Driver
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 6,275
Likes: 482
From: Long Island
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
Exactly

For day to day driving where you aren't winding the engine out its hard to go back. In the Pacifica we have the hybrid battery assist which really boosts the power down low compared with the NA V6, so while not FI it has some of the same characteristics, and now whenever I drive anything NA (most recently even the 6.2L V8 Yukon) it feels very heavy and lethargic in day to day driving. When you're used to beating anything off from a light with 1/3rd to 1/2 throttle its hard to go back.
yes yes i agreed with your point but come on even you know there's actual tangible qualities to a proper n/a engine that a modern turbo engine can't deliver... you'd need to be an enthusiast to notice them but something like an S2000, C63, and on the extreme end an LFA deliver an experience that a forced induction engine can't replicate
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2025 | 06:31 PM
  #101  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,807
Likes: 4,095
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by Stroock639
yes yes i agreed with your point but come on even you know there's actual tangible qualities to a proper n/a engine that a modern turbo engine can't deliver... you'd need to be an enthusiast to notice them but something like an S2000, C63, and on the extreme end an LFA deliver an experience that a forced induction engine can't replicate
Oh of course there are, I’m just talking about in everyday driving.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2025 | 06:34 PM
  #102  
Striker223's Avatar
Striker223
Lexus Champion
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 18,346
Likes: 1,795
From: Ohio
Default

Our everyday driver turbo car is a diesel so it has great punch down low....and that's it. Nothing past that, you go for the rest of the power and discover that's all it has lol!
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2025 | 06:37 PM
  #103  
BayeauxLex's Avatar
BayeauxLex
Lead Lap
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 3,958
Likes: 409
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
Having gone from NA engines to turbo engines, its hard to go back from a performance standpoint from my own experience. Every engine today uses synthetic oil, oil change intervals are the same. The LS requires premium fuel anyways.

Once you get used to the low end power from a turbocharged engine even high power NA engines feel lethargic.
May sound crazy but as great as the LC500 sounds, I chose the B58 over it due to me loving boost🫣

Originally Posted by SW17LS
You're reading different posts than I am. People who feel that way are overwhelmingly owners of NA engines lol. Those of us who have actually gone to FI engines overwhelmingly like them, three of them have replied the same in this very thread. Turbo lag isn't an issue in modern engines really.

When you get used to all the power available at 2,000 RPM in a FI engine, going back to having to wring one out to 5,000 RPM to get it makes them feel lethargic.
Even with its beefy V8, my wife always felt the LX 570 was lethargic. I told her to put it in sport mode but with hauling around kids, she wouldn’t remember to do that each time we got in the LX 570. She even felt the PHEV RAV4 was more responsive than the LX. Now with the B58, she has no complaints. The power delivery is effortless.

Originally Posted by Striker223
Correct, the computer is forced to ride the knock sensors and REACT to knock that is damaging the rings. On higher octane there is no timing pull because there is no low level knock to detect and correct for

Price difference here is not the best but I have a dozen customers who switched to 93 and it gained them 5-8mpg and no more oil consumption
Now I ran a few tanks of 93 in my truck and I never seen any increase like this. However when we used to have a MDX wife was being cheap and pumped 87 instead of 93 and the mpg drastically decreased. Like 4-5mpg. Never again.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2025 | 06:39 PM
  #104  
Striker223's Avatar
Striker223
Lexus Champion
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 18,346
Likes: 1,795
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by BayeauxLex
May sound crazy but as great as the LC500 sounds, I chose the B58 over it due to me loving boost🫣



Even with its beefy V8, my wife always felt the LX 570 was lethargic. I told her to put it in sport mode but with hauling around kids, she wouldn’t remember to do that each time we got in the LX 570. She even felt the PHEV RAV4 was more responsive than the LX. Now with the B58, she has no complaints. The power delivery is effortless.



Now I ran a few tanks of 93 in my truck and I never seen any increase like this. However when we used to have a MDX wife was being cheap and pumped 87 instead of 93 and the mpg drastically decreased. Like 4-5mpg. Never again.
Yes but like you said, it was a truck lol!
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2025 | 07:25 PM
  #105  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,807
Likes: 4,095
From: Maryland
Default

I would absolutely choose the B58 over the LC500 for everyday driving. That’s why they didn’t put that engine in the LS500, too high revving.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:12 AM.