Grid overload! friendly thoughts and ideas...
Yeah 15 years is a hard sell. My payback is about 5 years because of the generous SREC (solar credits) market in NJ. We've been producing less since the weather has sucked, but our old $500+ per month electric bills in the summer are down to ~$20-40 and I get ~$3,000 a year back in SREC sales. I generate about 15 a year and current market price is around ~$210
15 years is definitely a tough sell, I'm not sure why more states don't give tax credits towards solar as it benefits an already overtaxed grid
So my friend @Margate330 , from my understanding of the issue, it's going to take a combination of renewables (wind, solar, nuclear) and even natural gas and crude oil to some extent. Also the introduction of batteries arrays to store excess generated power. For example, I've already seen a number of Tesla charging stations using Solar and storing that energy into batteries. During peak periods, brownouts ect they switch to batteries, taking the strain off the grid.
In fact I'm planning to add battery storage to my home, as the excess electricity I generate goes back to the grid where my energy provider pays me peanuts for it and resells it at a premium. Imagine if lots of homes are able to store excess power and use it during peak periods or at night
In fact I'm planning to add battery storage to my home, as the excess electricity I generate goes back to the grid where my energy provider pays me peanuts for it and resells it at a premium. Imagine if lots of homes are able to store excess power and use it during peak periods or at night
so to have a solid setup i'd say you need 4 powerwalls, that's $60K + install
great savings...
You would rarely charge more than 13 kW a night unless you wait for your battery to get down to 10 percent SoC. In most cases we are "topping off" nightly. BTW there are state and Federal tax credits on battery packs making them cheaper, and as time goes on, they will become cheaper as all technology does
The battery packs are designed to store excess energy you generate and during brief periods such as nighttime, brownouts, or periods where the grid is being overtaxed you pull power from the packs. For extreme emergencies such as power outages, you would rely on a generator, in my case I would probably consider a natural gas generator because it can be directly hooked into our gas lines.
You also don't have to go with a Tesla wall, as there are other competitors in the market that offer battery storage
You also don't have to go with a Tesla wall, as there are other competitors in the market that offer battery storage
One of the reasons my payback period is so long and my electric bills are typically cheap is because I have a gas furnace, water heater and stove. My overall bill is higher but it’s split between the two.
I have an acquaintance with a Tesla 3 and solar at home. He’s a physician so his income reach is more than that of an average person. If you can do solar, great and there are programs in CA that make solar more affordable.
People do seem to find wind power a viable source of electricity. I am skeptical on that. A short drive out to La Quinta brings you by a windmill farm with many windmills not turning. Some of the fans are on the ground. Some are missing blades. Hence, skepticism.
The electricity needs to be produced and it needs to come from somewhere. Some charge stations are powered by fossil fuels. Gasp. We had the all new vehicles will all be EVs by 2035 followed within days by an announcement that EV owners should not charge their cars as we were expecting excessive load on the existing grid and rolling blackouts were expected.
Since then, what has been done to bolster the grid? Nothing that’s been made public, so probably…nothing. The goals are lofty and probably achievable. I am a policy wonk by education and politicians usually aren’t. They like to put the cart before the horse. Seems like that’s the case in CA. We have one nuke plant in operation and it’s scheduled for closure. So my question is, how do we support a lot more EVs while simultaneously eliminating a source of electricity and not adding any energy producing capacity?
I am not anti EV. I work in the industry and EV adoption helps me careerwise, but so does pumping gas. We do use fossil fuels to supply power to some of our charge stations. Gasp.
People do seem to find wind power a viable source of electricity. I am skeptical on that. A short drive out to La Quinta brings you by a windmill farm with many windmills not turning. Some of the fans are on the ground. Some are missing blades. Hence, skepticism.
The electricity needs to be produced and it needs to come from somewhere. Some charge stations are powered by fossil fuels. Gasp. We had the all new vehicles will all be EVs by 2035 followed within days by an announcement that EV owners should not charge their cars as we were expecting excessive load on the existing grid and rolling blackouts were expected.
Since then, what has been done to bolster the grid? Nothing that’s been made public, so probably…nothing. The goals are lofty and probably achievable. I am a policy wonk by education and politicians usually aren’t. They like to put the cart before the horse. Seems like that’s the case in CA. We have one nuke plant in operation and it’s scheduled for closure. So my question is, how do we support a lot more EVs while simultaneously eliminating a source of electricity and not adding any energy producing capacity?
I am not anti EV. I work in the industry and EV adoption helps me careerwise, but so does pumping gas. We do use fossil fuels to supply power to some of our charge stations. Gasp.
I have an acquaintance with a Tesla 3 and solar at home. He’s a physician so his income reach is more than that of an average person. If you can do solar, great and there are programs in CA that make solar more affordable.
People do seem to find wind power a viable source of electricity. I am skeptical on that. A short drive out to La Quinta brings you by a windmill farm with many windmills not turning. Some of the fans are on the ground. Some are missing blades. Hence, skepticism.
The electricity needs to be produced and it needs to come from somewhere. Some charge stations are powered by fossil fuels. Gasp. We had the all new vehicles will all be EVs by 2035 followed within days by an announcement that EV owners should not charge their cars as we were expecting excessive load on the existing grid and rolling blackouts were expected.
Since then, what has been done to bolster the grid? Nothing that’s been made public, so probably…nothing. The goals are lofty and probably achievable. I am a policy wonk by education and politicians usually aren’t. They like to put the cart before the horse. Seems like that’s the case in CA. We have one nuke plant in operation and it’s scheduled for closure. So my question is, how do we support a lot more EVs while simultaneously eliminating a source of electricity and not adding any energy producing capacity?
I am not anti EV. I work in the industry and EV adoption helps me careerwise, but so does pumping gas. We do use fossil fuels to supply power to some of our charge stations. Gasp.
People do seem to find wind power a viable source of electricity. I am skeptical on that. A short drive out to La Quinta brings you by a windmill farm with many windmills not turning. Some of the fans are on the ground. Some are missing blades. Hence, skepticism.
The electricity needs to be produced and it needs to come from somewhere. Some charge stations are powered by fossil fuels. Gasp. We had the all new vehicles will all be EVs by 2035 followed within days by an announcement that EV owners should not charge their cars as we were expecting excessive load on the existing grid and rolling blackouts were expected.
Since then, what has been done to bolster the grid? Nothing that’s been made public, so probably…nothing. The goals are lofty and probably achievable. I am a policy wonk by education and politicians usually aren’t. They like to put the cart before the horse. Seems like that’s the case in CA. We have one nuke plant in operation and it’s scheduled for closure. So my question is, how do we support a lot more EVs while simultaneously eliminating a source of electricity and not adding any energy producing capacity?
I am not anti EV. I work in the industry and EV adoption helps me careerwise, but so does pumping gas. We do use fossil fuels to supply power to some of our charge stations. Gasp.
I also want to mention that my "off peak" power comes from San Jose Clean Energy (run by the City of San Jose), which generates most of its energy through renewable sources
People do seem to find wind power a viable source of electricity. I am skeptical on that. A short drive out to La Quinta brings you by a windmill farm with many windmills not turning. Some of the fans are on the ground. Some are missing blades. Hence, skepticism.
The electricity needs to be produced and it needs to come from somewhere. Some charge stations are powered by fossil fuels. Gasp. We had the all new vehicles will all be EVs by 2035 followed within days by an announcement that EV owners should not charge their cars as we were expecting excessive load on the existing grid and rolling blackouts were expected.
Since then, what has been done to bolster the grid? Nothing that’s been made public, so probably…nothing. The goals are lofty and probably achievable. I am a policy wonk by education and politicians usually aren’t. They like to put the cart before the horse. Seems like that’s the case in CA. We have one nuke plant in operation and it’s scheduled for closure. So my question is, how do we support a lot more EVs while simultaneously eliminating a source of electricity and not adding any energy producing capacity?
I am not anti EV. I work in the industry and EV adoption helps me careerwise, but so does pumping gas. We do use fossil fuels to supply power to some of our charge stations. Gasp.
The electricity needs to be produced and it needs to come from somewhere. Some charge stations are powered by fossil fuels. Gasp. We had the all new vehicles will all be EVs by 2035 followed within days by an announcement that EV owners should not charge their cars as we were expecting excessive load on the existing grid and rolling blackouts were expected.
Since then, what has been done to bolster the grid? Nothing that’s been made public, so probably…nothing. The goals are lofty and probably achievable. I am a policy wonk by education and politicians usually aren’t. They like to put the cart before the horse. Seems like that’s the case in CA. We have one nuke plant in operation and it’s scheduled for closure. So my question is, how do we support a lot more EVs while simultaneously eliminating a source of electricity and not adding any energy producing capacity?
I am not anti EV. I work in the industry and EV adoption helps me careerwise, but so does pumping gas. We do use fossil fuels to supply power to some of our charge stations. Gasp.
You said some things I had suspected and good to hear from someone with boots on the ground.
We need upgrades, it's inevitable.
Ev's or not, they know it's true so start spending the $$$ Billions they rake in and do something! Lol
I can tell you personally living in California and owning EV's since 2020 I've had ZERO issues charging. The strains on the grid that you mention only happen 3 or 4 times a year during intense heat waves where AC use is at its highest, which is usually between 3PM and 9PM.
They'll ask us not to water the lawn or wash cars.
I can tell you personally living in California and owning EV's since 2020 I've had ZERO issues charging. The strains on the grid that you mention only happen 3 or 4 times a year during intense heat waves where AC use is at its highest, which is usually between 3PM and 9PM. People mostly charge their cars after 9PM (usually between 12am and 4am) when grid use is at it's lowest and rates are at their cheapest...non peak hours. Charging your EV uses nowhere near the power my Central AC uses. In fact, my electricity usage is at it's highest June through September due to AC usage.
I also want to mention that my "off peak" power comes from San Jose Clean Energy (run by the City of San Jose), which generates most of its energy through renewable sources
I also want to mention that my "off peak" power comes from San Jose Clean Energy (run by the City of San Jose), which generates most of its energy through renewable sources
I can tell you personally living in California and owning EV's since 2020 I've had ZERO issues charging. The strains on the grid that you mention only happen 3 or 4 times a year during intense heat waves where AC use is at its highest, which is usually between 3PM and 9PM. People mostly charge their cars after 9PM (usually between 12am and 4am) when grid use is at it's lowest and rates are at their cheapest...non peak hours. Charging your EV uses nowhere near the power my Central AC uses. In fact, my electricity usage is at it's highest June through September due to AC usage.
I also want to mention that my "off peak" power comes from San Jose Clean Energy (run by the City of San Jose), which generates most of its energy through renewable sources
I also want to mention that my "off peak" power comes from San Jose Clean Energy (run by the City of San Jose), which generates most of its energy through renewable sources
The unaddressed point of my previous post is that we are putting additional load on a grid that cannot support the growing demand. Sure it may draw less to charge your EV than it takes to run your AC. Everyone in CA is going to run their A/C and perhaps I am being obtuse in not understanding how more demand on a grid that fails under existing demand is going to support more.
My work, we sort of ignore home charging in North America. We are with fleets. Delivery, impatient quarterbacks, you name it. How do we get juice to those boxes?
You are sorted and that’s good. My best bud is sorted too. He’s a multi millionaire though, so he has resources that many don’t.
The unaddressed point of my previous post is that we are putting additional load on a grid that cannot support the growing demand. Sure it may draw less to charge your EV than it takes to run your AC. Everyone in CA is going to run their A/C and perhaps I am being obtuse in not understanding how more demand on a grid that fails under existing demand is going to support more.
My work, we sort of ignore home charging in North America. We are with fleets. Delivery, impatient quarterbacks, you name it. How do we get juice to those boxes?
The unaddressed point of my previous post is that we are putting additional load on a grid that cannot support the growing demand. Sure it may draw less to charge your EV than it takes to run your AC. Everyone in CA is going to run their A/C and perhaps I am being obtuse in not understanding how more demand on a grid that fails under existing demand is going to support more.
My work, we sort of ignore home charging in North America. We are with fleets. Delivery, impatient quarterbacks, you name it. How do we get juice to those boxes?











