IS-F intake shootout. indep dynos for Injen and AFE Takeda
#196
Lexus Fanatic
playing cards in a kid's bicycle spokes.........basically. I dig the added sound but your not going any faster. In fact it might actually slightly slow you down
#197
After I read the 10+ pages, here are my remaining questions:
1) How long does it take the ECU to adjust AFRs and fuel curves?
2) If pulling the battery terminal has no affect on "learned" curves, is it possible that it may be difficult to EVER get a comparison reading or an apples to apples comparsion?
3) Are the people comparing intakes (vs other aftermarket intakes or stock) waiting for or accounting for the lengthy time to adjust?
4) Has anyone done flow bench testing on the stock box vs aftermarket solutions or are we going solely off of dyno data taken from multiple dynos, different dyno manufacturers, different ambient conditions, and quite frankly different cars (albeit same make and model)?
I would love to know the current best knowledge on this topic because I have located a stock airbox for purchase after reading how bad the K&N CAI (and others) was due to heat soak. Now given the uncertainty of how the K&N was determined to be bad it makes me wonder if it is no better or no worse (over time) than anything else.
My biggest concern is can the stock airbox repeatedly give me better performance over the K&N, and if I chose to purchase the stock airbox and install headers, will the increase in exhaust flow be inhibited by the stock airbox or can the stock box flow enough to maximize gains seen from the headers? Do definitive answers to these questions exist? Does anyone have dyno data for their mods taken months after the mods were done? This would seem to allow all things to return to equilibrium rather taking data from dyno run taken an hour after an intake was installed.
1) How long does it take the ECU to adjust AFRs and fuel curves?
2) If pulling the battery terminal has no affect on "learned" curves, is it possible that it may be difficult to EVER get a comparison reading or an apples to apples comparsion?
3) Are the people comparing intakes (vs other aftermarket intakes or stock) waiting for or accounting for the lengthy time to adjust?
4) Has anyone done flow bench testing on the stock box vs aftermarket solutions or are we going solely off of dyno data taken from multiple dynos, different dyno manufacturers, different ambient conditions, and quite frankly different cars (albeit same make and model)?
I would love to know the current best knowledge on this topic because I have located a stock airbox for purchase after reading how bad the K&N CAI (and others) was due to heat soak. Now given the uncertainty of how the K&N was determined to be bad it makes me wonder if it is no better or no worse (over time) than anything else.
My biggest concern is can the stock airbox repeatedly give me better performance over the K&N, and if I chose to purchase the stock airbox and install headers, will the increase in exhaust flow be inhibited by the stock airbox or can the stock box flow enough to maximize gains seen from the headers? Do definitive answers to these questions exist? Does anyone have dyno data for their mods taken months after the mods were done? This would seem to allow all things to return to equilibrium rather taking data from dyno run taken an hour after an intake was installed.
#198
Driver School Candidate
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This has certainly been a very interesting thread. Lots of good information. I guess the big question in my mind at this point is: why hasn't anyone tried to put together a true cold air system that is pulling air from the fender well area (similar to an AEM cold air intake)? I see from AEM's website that they are requesting the use of an IS-F for fabrication use, so I'm wondering why nobody local has jumped on that? If the biggest factor holding the short ram style intakes back is heat soak, it seems like a no-brainer to put together a true cold air style intake, especially since the price point for the Takeda is approaching $350 give or take. A similar style intake from AEM ( the Dodge Challenger/Charger for example) is a similar style/shape that would be needed for the IS-F and it's about $370 direct from AEM. Can't imagine that none of these vendors has at least considered the possibility of a real cold air intake system...
#199
Well, I purchased the OEM intake yesterday from a local salvage yard. They are parting the car (Black 2009 I think) out and they are called Eastern Auto Salvage in Biscoe, NC. I came across them on car-part.com.
I plan on buying a drop in filter and running the stock system, but will hold onto the K&N in case I don't like the stock system. If I can find the time and a local dyno, I would like to examine the existing K&N now and the new stock one about 3 months after installing it. It would be great to find an indoor dyno with repeatable temp and humidity. With all of the local NASCAR shops, I would imagine an indoor dyno would not be hard to find.
Anyone running the stock box with headers? If so, what hp are you making?
I plan on buying a drop in filter and running the stock system, but will hold onto the K&N in case I don't like the stock system. If I can find the time and a local dyno, I would like to examine the existing K&N now and the new stock one about 3 months after installing it. It would be great to find an indoor dyno with repeatable temp and humidity. With all of the local NASCAR shops, I would imagine an indoor dyno would not be hard to find.
Anyone running the stock box with headers? If so, what hp are you making?
#201
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
This has certainly been a very interesting thread. Lots of good information. I guess the big question in my mind at this point is: why hasn't anyone tried to put together a true cold air system that is pulling air from the fender well area (similar to an AEM cold air intake)? I see from AEM's website that they are requesting the use of an IS-F for fabrication use, so I'm wondering why nobody local has jumped on that? If the biggest factor holding the short ram style intakes back is heat soak, it seems like a no-brainer to put together a true cold air style intake, especially since the price point for the Takeda is approaching $350 give or take. A similar style intake from AEM ( the Dodge Challenger/Charger for example) is a similar style/shape that would be needed for the IS-F and it's about $370 direct from AEM. Can't imagine that none of these vendors has at least considered the possibility of a real cold air intake system...
#202
#203
Driver School Candidate
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wouldn't imagine that would help in the slightest... there's a decent amount of engineering and design that goes into a properly setup intake. Pipe diameter, MAF placement, length, etc.
#205
This has certainly been a very interesting thread. Lots of good information. I guess the big question in my mind at this point is: why hasn't anyone tried to put together a true cold air system that is pulling air from the fender well area (similar to an AEM cold air intake)? I see from AEM's website that they are requesting the use of an IS-F for fabrication use, so I'm wondering why nobody local has jumped on that? If the biggest factor holding the short ram style intakes back is heat soak, it seems like a no-brainer to put together a true cold air style intake, especially since the price point for the Takeda is approaching $350 give or take. A similar style intake from AEM ( the Dodge Challenger/Charger for example) is a similar style/shape that would be needed for the IS-F and it's about $370 direct from AEM. Can't imagine that none of these vendors has at least considered the possibility of a real cold air intake system...
Lexus put a ton of R&D into this car, including the dual stage intake. I don't know how much more improvement can be made to it, consider it's a naturally aspirated engine, hence may not be worth the stretch on trying to develop something better.
#206
Driver School Candidate
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Isn't the stock box goes into the fender in the first place?
Lexus put a ton of R&D into this car, including the dual stage intake. I don't know how much more improvement can be made to it, consider it's a naturally aspirated engine, hence may not be worth the stretch on trying to develop something better.
Lexus put a ton of R&D into this car, including the dual stage intake. I don't know how much more improvement can be made to it, consider it's a naturally aspirated engine, hence may not be worth the stretch on trying to develop something better.
**EDIT**Just spoke with AEM and they are looking for a 2013-2014 IS-F for R&D use and/or intake fabrication. They need the vehicle for a couple of weeks and will provide a rental car for the duration. Customer gets an intake for free out of the deal. Fill out the form here if you're interested: http://www.aemintakes.com/search/vehicle.aspx
Last edited by otbevo; 08-06-15 at 09:55 AM. Reason: New info from AEM
#207
Pole Position
Anybody take AEM's offer on the R&D for the intake??
The following users liked this post:
Carlos250 (10-14-20)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gathering Interest Speed Freaks USA: aFe Intake feeler thread
SpeedFreaksUSA
CL Vendor Products for IS-F
25
08-28-15 03:25 PM