Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

R&T: FR-S vs. Mustang Ecoboost vs. 228i

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-26-15, 11:19 AM
  #1  
GFerg
Speaks French in Russian
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
GFerg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: What is G?
Posts: 13,302
Received 65 Likes on 50 Posts
Default R&T: FR-S vs. Mustang Ecoboost vs. 228i

A very long read, but what I have read is pretty damn good.






But lap times aren't relevant when you're looking for fun. The FR-S may be the slowest, but we always grabbed its keys first. Pinto: "I really like the Mustang, but when there are smaller cars around, I'm going to play with the smaller cars. Although the Scion's engine is torqueless, noisy, and joyless, the seating position is stellar, the cowl is low, and the shifter is the best of the group by a large margin." The FR-S requires more of the driver, but it returns the favor by giving back more satisfaction.

If the Scion is an example of a car that does more with less, the BMW is an example of how to do less with more—more grip, more speed, but less finesse and far less entertainment. And the Mustang? It's just an American glutton: more size, more weight, more better. Then again, the GT's 5.0-liter V-8 does even more with even more. The 2.3-liter EcoBoost is fine on paper, but when you factor in real-world fuel economy (we saw 13 mpg overall, the worst of the bunch), you'd have to be insane not to buy the V-8, especially since the four, as Prince points out, "has the aural appeal of an unmuffled 1980s Volvo turbodiesel."

On paper, the Scion needs more power. In practice, it needs no such thing. It's fast enough to keep you interested and balanced enough to steer with the rear wheels. Best of all, it spurs you to use everything it's got, on the road and around a track.




http://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars...st-scion-fr-s/
GFerg is offline  
Old 05-26-15, 12:12 PM
  #2  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,059
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

read the article the other day and R&T said the ecoboost mustang feels more BMW than the BMW
4TehNguyen is offline  
Old 05-26-15, 03:03 PM
  #3  
Aron9000
Lexus Champion
 
Aron9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: TN
Posts: 4,592
Received 28 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

I've read other articles bashing the new 2 series BMW as well, saying it handles like an elephant.
Aron9000 is offline  
Old 05-26-15, 03:09 PM
  #4  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Forum Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,310
Received 126 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

In a nut shell

Scion is the best driver
BMW is plush but clumsy
Mustang is entertaining but 'extra(s)' takes its toll
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 05-26-15, 03:33 PM
  #5  
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
 
RNM GS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 7,261
Received 70 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

As an owner of a BRZ - I like the result

Honestly these 3 cars are very different imo - i think 228i is very fun to drive and I have driven it at Autocross events several times, not sure why R&T didnt like it. I would even consider getting it but i hate how it looks especially interior wise.
There are many great/positive reviews of the M235i and the 228i with Track Package.

Mustang is much bigger and heavier than the other 2.
I have only driven it on the roads but it is pretty soft compared to BRZ/2series.
RNM GS3 is offline  
Old 05-27-15, 11:38 AM
  #6  
speedflex
Lexus Champion
 
speedflex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: MO
Posts: 2,545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The article seems so British that I thought I was reading CAR or Top Gear. Glad they took these cars through the paces instead of a dull track-only test.
speedflex is offline  
Old 05-27-15, 06:44 PM
  #7  
geko29
Super Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
geko29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 8,024
Received 309 Likes on 237 Posts
Default

Never thought I'd see the terms "2.3-Liter" and "13 mpg overall" in the same sentence. To put that in perspective, the E90 M3 with its 4.0L V8 gets 14 mpg in town and 7 mpg wailing away at 8,400 rpm on the track.
geko29 is online now  
Old 05-28-15, 05:11 AM
  #8  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,059
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

turbo cars do not make good mpg when boosting all the time
4TehNguyen is offline  
Old 05-28-15, 05:22 AM
  #9  
evident
Racer
 
evident's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 1,564
Received 126 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

13 MPG on the eco boost. WTF?

I've driven the ford escape w/ the ecoboost turbo engine as a rental for a day. zippy car no doubt. but It returned similar MPG with me driving just on the NJ turnpike for 100 miles.

give me the 5.0 V8 Mustang any day
evident is offline  
Old 05-28-15, 07:33 AM
  #10  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,059
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

well it was 13mpg driven hard, when driven normally the EB makes better mpg than the V8. Thing is turbo engines have to be driven perfect, even moreso than an NA, to get good mpg.
4TehNguyen is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ragingf80
Car Chat
11
05-09-17 12:01 PM
Motor
Car Chat
16
04-01-15 08:53 AM
Whitigir
Car Chat
17
03-22-14 12:42 PM
LexFather
Car Chat
16
08-28-10 08:13 AM



Quick Reply: R&T: FR-S vs. Mustang Ecoboost vs. 228i



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:53 AM.