Sequoia vs Land Cruiser size comparison
04-01-13, 07:54 AM
#1
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: AK
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sequoia vs Land Cruiser size comparison
I found this photo on instagram. Its obviously not the best quality and i assume it was taken somewhere in the Middle East.
.
.
Last edited by UZJ100GXR; 04-01-13 at 08:10 AM.
04-01-13, 10:44 AM
#6
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: AK
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seqouia - Wheel base, 122.0 in
Length, 205.1 in
Height, 77.0 in in
Width, 79.9 in
200 Series - Wheel base, 112.2 in
Length, 194.9 in
Height, 74.0 in
Width, 77.6 in
100 Series - Wheel base, 112.2 in
Length, 192.5 in
Height, 72.8 in
Width, 76.4 in
150 Series ( Prado GX/460 ) - Wheel base, 112.2 in
Length, 189.8 in
Height, 72.6 in
Width, 74.2 in
Length, 205.1 in
Height, 77.0 in in
Width, 79.9 in
200 Series - Wheel base, 112.2 in
Length, 194.9 in
Height, 74.0 in
Width, 77.6 in
100 Series - Wheel base, 112.2 in
Length, 192.5 in
Height, 72.8 in
Width, 76.4 in
150 Series ( Prado GX/460 ) - Wheel base, 112.2 in
Length, 189.8 in
Height, 72.6 in
Width, 74.2 in
04-01-13, 11:14 AM
#7
Pole Position
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's kind of interesting regarding the pricing of Land Cruiser and Sequoia.
The Cadillac STS was also smaller than the DTS but was more expensive.
As far as i know, I think these are the only two examples in which the smaller model from the same lineup costs more than the similar "bigger” brother.
The Cadillac STS was also smaller than the DTS but was more expensive.
As far as i know, I think these are the only two examples in which the smaller model from the same lineup costs more than the similar "bigger” brother.
Trending Topics
04-01-13, 11:37 AM
#9
Lead Lap
It's kind of interesting regarding the pricing of Land Cruiser and Sequoia.
The Cadillac STS was also smaller than the DTS but was more expensive.
As far as i know, I think these are the only two examples in which the smaller model from the same lineup costs more than the similar "bigger” brother.
The Cadillac STS was also smaller than the DTS but was more expensive.
As far as i know, I think these are the only two examples in which the smaller model from the same lineup costs more than the similar "bigger” brother.
04-01-13, 11:37 AM
#10
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: AK
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They are completely different vehicles. As PhilipMSPT said, the Sequoia is more of a family hauler/road vehicle. It was designed for carrying people in comfort. The LC is more rugged, it has a solid rear axle ( Sequoia has independent suspension ). It is better built than the Sequoia, after all it is more expensive. The LC200 is designed with off road abilities in mind. While it might not be made for hardcore rock crawler like a Jeep Wrangler for example, it is still designed for off road driving, and would make a very good expedition vehicle. The LC also has more off road gizmos ( It also sells more than the Sequoia world wide ). I was also told that the LC rides better than the Sequoia even though it has a solid rear axle.
Apples and oranges.
Apples and oranges.
Last edited by UZJ100GXR; 04-01-13 at 11:40 AM.
04-01-13, 01:46 PM
#12
Pole Position
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by tangored
Don't forget the Mercedes GL-class vs. G-class. Their relationship is similar to the Sequoia and Land Crusier.
Originally Posted by philipmspt
Unless if we talk about sports cars, like the Scion TC and FR-S.
How about Land Rover? Isn't the LR4 much bigger than the RR Sport?
How about Land Rover? Isn't the LR4 much bigger than the RR Sport?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jeeper2269
IS - 3rd Gen (2014-present)
1
01-06-20 07:54 AM
