TX500h Fuel Capacity Issue
Driver
Joined: Dec 2025
Posts: 73
Likes: 36
Your TX350 gas tank should hold about 17.8 usable gallons on level ground, INCLUDING RESERVE, before the engine suffers fuel starvation. Mine (2026 TX500h) is rated at 17.2 and I can easily and repeatedly put in 16-16.2 gallons and recently went to 16.8 with zero spill/"spit back". So I'd think you could put in a bit more than I could (perhaps aim for 16.5?) if you ran it down to zero miles DTE with the LOW FUEL light ON, as I do when checking tank capacity. Note that when my DTE is indicated as "7 Miles", the car often goes significantly further before it actually "hits" zero DTE ("REFUEL NOW").
I suggest you run it down to "REFUEL NOW" as shown on the fuel gauge with "LOW FUEL" light on, for a more accurate fuel tank capacity check and do a complete, fill, pause for 20 seconds, then SLOW fill/SLOW fill. This fill method is documented in SAE standard J398_200503, which specifies how to measure and rate fuel tank capacity. Many auto manufacturers use it as a guide. One version (an older one) of this document is available HERE (and there are newer ones available on line as well - but you'll have to research this):
https://www.scribd.com/document/7561...ht-Duty-Trucks
Note that if the fuel is really "Spitting back" during your fill-up it may be foaming inside the tank and filler neck, per the SAE standard warning and a SLOW/SLOW/SLOW fill may be needed. This would be due to both/either the fuel formulation and/or an unusually high rate of fast fill.
If your results are still short, then perhaps go to a Lexus Service Center and ask about a TSB relating to overly pessimistic fuel gauge readings, complain about it and request an update. The Grand Highlander, which is VERY similar, has: "Technical Service Bulletin (TSB) T-SB-0060-25 to address 2024 Grand Highlander/Hybrid vehicles that cannot fill more than 12–15 gallons of fuel into the 17.8-gallon tank". It seems pretty obvious that this is likely to apply to the TX as well.
Hope this helps!
Last edited by Stonebender; Jan 24, 2026 at 10:58 AM.
Pit Crew
Joined: Oct 2025
Posts: 240
Likes: 70
From: Florida
Interesting. Here are a few suggestions for your consideration, based on my own personal 2026 TX 500h experience and non-professional (retiree) opinion ...
Your TX350 gas tank should hold about 17.8 usable gallons on level ground, INCLUDING RESERVE, before the engine suffers fuel starvation. Mine (2026 TX500h) is rated at 17.2 and I can easily and repeatedly put in 16-16.2 gallons and recently went to 16.8 with zero spill/"spit back". So I'd think you could put in a bit more than I could (perhaps aim for 16.5?) if you ran it down to zero miles DTE with the LOW FUEL light ON, as I do when checking tank capacity. Note that when my DTE is indicated as "7 Miles", the car often goes significantly further before it actually "hits" zero DTE ("REFUEL NOW").
I suggest you run it down to "REFUEL NOW" as shown on the fuel gauge with "LOW FUEL" light on, for a more accurate fuel tank capacity check and do a complete, fill, pause for 20 seconds, then SLOW fill/SLOW fill. This fill method is documented in SAE standard J398_200503, which specifies how to measure and rate fuel tank capacity. Many auto manufacturers use it as a guide. One version (an older one) of this document is available HERE (and there are newer ones available on line as well - but you'll have to research this):
https://www.scribd.com/document/7561...ht-Duty-Trucks
Note that if the fuel is really "Spitting back" during your fill-up it may be foaming inside the tank and filler neck, per the SAE standard warning and a SLOW/SLOW/SLOW fill may be needed. This would be due to both/either the fuel formulation and/or an unusually high rate of fast fill.
If your results are still short, then perhaps go to a Lexus Service Center and ask about a TSB relating to overly pessimistic fuel gauge readings, complain about it and request an update. The Grand Highlander, which is VERY similar, has: "Technical Service Bulletin (TSB) T-SB-0060-25 to address 2024 Grand Highlander/Hybrid vehicles that cannot fill more than 12–15 gallons of fuel into the 17.8-gallon tank". It seems pretty obvious that this is likely to apply to the TX as well.
Hope this helps!
Your TX350 gas tank should hold about 17.8 usable gallons on level ground, INCLUDING RESERVE, before the engine suffers fuel starvation. Mine (2026 TX500h) is rated at 17.2 and I can easily and repeatedly put in 16-16.2 gallons and recently went to 16.8 with zero spill/"spit back". So I'd think you could put in a bit more than I could (perhaps aim for 16.5?) if you ran it down to zero miles DTE with the LOW FUEL light ON, as I do when checking tank capacity. Note that when my DTE is indicated as "7 Miles", the car often goes significantly further before it actually "hits" zero DTE ("REFUEL NOW").
I suggest you run it down to "REFUEL NOW" as shown on the fuel gauge with "LOW FUEL" light on, for a more accurate fuel tank capacity check and do a complete, fill, pause for 20 seconds, then SLOW fill/SLOW fill. This fill method is documented in SAE standard J398_200503, which specifies how to measure and rate fuel tank capacity. Many auto manufacturers use it as a guide. One version (an older one) of this document is available HERE (and there are newer ones available on line as well - but you'll have to research this):
https://www.scribd.com/document/7561...ht-Duty-Trucks
Note that if the fuel is really "Spitting back" during your fill-up it may be foaming inside the tank and filler neck, per the SAE standard warning and a SLOW/SLOW/SLOW fill may be needed. This would be due to both/either the fuel formulation and/or an unusually high rate of fast fill.
If your results are still short, then perhaps go to a Lexus Service Center and ask about a TSB relating to overly pessimistic fuel gauge readings, complain about it and request an update. The Grand Highlander, which is VERY similar, has: "Technical Service Bulletin (TSB) T-SB-0060-25 to address 2024 Grand Highlander/Hybrid vehicles that cannot fill more than 12–15 gallons of fuel into the 17.8-gallon tank". It seems pretty obvious that this is likely to apply to the TX as well.
Hope this helps!
Lead Lap
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 3,958
Likes: 409
I would suggest resetting trip B at one of those intervals to keep track how many miles traveled before you refuel and compare to how much it takes to fill up.
Also does trip A auto reset every fillup?
Driver
Joined: Nov 2025
Posts: 64
Likes: 5
Makes me want a 197o's
A 1970 base model "analog" car had reasonably accurate fuel reading at a stsnd still on a flat surface, though it would have "spit back" on refueling -- more like a flood.
Today a high end, high technology Lexus TX can not display the correct capacity leaving it's loyal customers to make educated guesses.
Pretty ironic.
Today a high end, high technology Lexus TX can not display the correct capacity leaving it's loyal customers to make educated guesses.
Pretty ironic.
Driver
Joined: Dec 2025
Posts: 73
Likes: 36
My Honda Accord from years ago (1983) has a separate and independent low fuel sensor (thermistor dipped in fuel), but I doubt the TX500h does that and speculate that it's just a modified float level sensing algorithm.
Both Trip A and Trip B are manually reset ONLY. They are ideal for tracking actual mileage between fill-ups.
Rookie
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 43
Likes: 18
Interesting. Here are a few suggestions for your consideration, based on my own personal 2026 TX 500h experience and non-professional (retiree) opinion ...
Your TX350 gas tank should hold about 17.8 usable gallons on level ground, INCLUDING RESERVE, before the engine suffers fuel starvation. Mine (2026 TX500h) is rated at 17.2 and I can easily and repeatedly put in 16-16.2 gallons and recently went to 16.8 with zero spill/"spit back". So I'd think you could put in a bit more than I could (perhaps aim for 16.5?) if you ran it down to zero miles DTE with the LOW FUEL light ON, as I do when checking tank capacity. Note that when my DTE is indicated as "7 Miles", the car often goes significantly further before it actually "hits" zero DTE ("REFUEL NOW").
I suggest you run it down to "REFUEL NOW" as shown on the fuel gauge with "LOW FUEL" light on, for a more accurate fuel tank capacity check and do a complete, fill, pause for 20 seconds, then SLOW fill/SLOW fill. This fill method is documented in SAE standard J398_200503, which specifies how to measure and rate fuel tank capacity. Many auto manufacturers use it as a guide. One version (an older one) of this document is available HERE (and there are newer ones available on line as well - but you'll have to research this):
https://www.scribd.com/document/7561...ht-Duty-Trucks
Note that if the fuel is really "Spitting back" during your fill-up it may be foaming inside the tank and filler neck, per the SAE standard warning and a SLOW/SLOW/SLOW fill may be needed. This would be due to both/either the fuel formulation and/or an unusually high rate of fast fill.
If your results are still short, then perhaps go to a Lexus Service Center and ask about a TSB relating to overly pessimistic fuel gauge readings, complain about it and request an update. The Grand Highlander, which is VERY similar, has: "Technical Service Bulletin (TSB) T-SB-0060-25 to address 2024 Grand Highlander/Hybrid vehicles that cannot fill more than 12–15 gallons of fuel into the 17.8-gallon tank". It seems pretty obvious that this is likely to apply to the TX as well.
Hope this helps!
Your TX350 gas tank should hold about 17.8 usable gallons on level ground, INCLUDING RESERVE, before the engine suffers fuel starvation. Mine (2026 TX500h) is rated at 17.2 and I can easily and repeatedly put in 16-16.2 gallons and recently went to 16.8 with zero spill/"spit back". So I'd think you could put in a bit more than I could (perhaps aim for 16.5?) if you ran it down to zero miles DTE with the LOW FUEL light ON, as I do when checking tank capacity. Note that when my DTE is indicated as "7 Miles", the car often goes significantly further before it actually "hits" zero DTE ("REFUEL NOW").
I suggest you run it down to "REFUEL NOW" as shown on the fuel gauge with "LOW FUEL" light on, for a more accurate fuel tank capacity check and do a complete, fill, pause for 20 seconds, then SLOW fill/SLOW fill. This fill method is documented in SAE standard J398_200503, which specifies how to measure and rate fuel tank capacity. Many auto manufacturers use it as a guide. One version (an older one) of this document is available HERE (and there are newer ones available on line as well - but you'll have to research this):
https://www.scribd.com/document/7561...ht-Duty-Trucks
Note that if the fuel is really "Spitting back" during your fill-up it may be foaming inside the tank and filler neck, per the SAE standard warning and a SLOW/SLOW/SLOW fill may be needed. This would be due to both/either the fuel formulation and/or an unusually high rate of fast fill.
If your results are still short, then perhaps go to a Lexus Service Center and ask about a TSB relating to overly pessimistic fuel gauge readings, complain about it and request an update. The Grand Highlander, which is VERY similar, has: "Technical Service Bulletin (TSB) T-SB-0060-25 to address 2024 Grand Highlander/Hybrid vehicles that cannot fill more than 12–15 gallons of fuel into the 17.8-gallon tank". It seems pretty obvious that this is likely to apply to the TX as well.
Hope this helps!
For a bit of background, purchased Jan 2025, with 14 miles on the odo, have about 21,000 miles and avg 24.5 mpg. 60/40 split predominantly city driving in a somewhat hilly part of Southern California
Last edited by TxCool; Jan 25, 2026 at 10:10 PM.
Driver
Joined: Dec 2025
Posts: 73
Likes: 36
A 1970 base model "analog" car had reasonably accurate fuel reading at a stsnd still on a flat surface, though it would have "spit back" on refueling -- more like a flood. Today a high end, high technology Lexus TX can not display the correct capacity leaving it's loyal customers to make educated guesses. Pretty ironic.
The current (2026) TX500h is not too bad. Like most cars the owner FIRST has to realize there are SIX fuel "segments" to the meter. Above full (as in ALL cars), reserve below EMPTY (as in all cars) and the four segments in between, On mine, 1/2 tank as indicated is almost exactly 1/2 tank. On average, the top five "segments" are about 3.2 gallons each - but its NOT precisely linear, though you'd think a digital gauge could be linearized with a simple calculation.
I think the problem is TOO MUCH information, not inaccuracy. It looks to me like owners are taking the estimated DTE range as gospel and forgetting about the gauge, not realizing its just an ESTIMATE based on past driving - which can change from tank to tank and even over just a few miles
And a lot of anxiety against using the full usable fuel tank capacity exists despite TWO additional steps of low fuel monitoring: 1. The LOW FUEL icon, which comes on first, and then the: 2. REFUEL NOW indicator, which means the car believes its down to its final reserve. Meaning you CAN go further (but should find a gas station REAL soon).
And even more anxiety is common about actually filling up the tank, with widespread belief that the first "click off" during fast fill means the tank is FULL. Nope. Never does. Check the SAE standard for fill technique. And for Pete's sake, do the final fill S L O W L Y. Ever try filling a 1 gallon glass bottle FAST, all the way? It'll spit back as it approaches about 1/4 full, even though it's NOT full.
Not filling up the tank completely + not driving until its down to reserve = greatly reduced APPARENT fuel tank capacity.
BTW ... SOP back in the day was to NEVER let the fuel gauge go below 1/4, precisely because the gauges sometime meant "empty" right at or above "EMPTY" ('74 Cadillac Coupe DeVille and '62 Chevy Biscayne, for example). And the 2nd gen Nissan 300ZX actually had TWO fuel gauges to help with "range anxiety" - the 2nd one for just the last 1/8 tank.
The Biscayne tank was about 16 gallons as I recall - smaller than the TX. MANY of my cars had 16 (usable) gallon tanks. And a few were "rolling oil fields" that held 30+ gallons.
One of my current analog gauge cars is a classic whose gauge more or less reads "No fuel" or "some fuel". This was not a cheap car either.
My conclusions? Read the fuel gauge on the TX500h, take the DTE as an advisement that is very approximate (as it is on ALL cars), and if you're upset about range - drive the car until LOW FUEL and REFUEL NOW comes on. THEN fill up the tank completely using the method used to rate its capacity in the first place (fast fill/slow fill/slow fill).
And if THAT does not work, perhaps on an older production run, check to see if there is a TSB that applies.
Back in 2020, MANY owners complained that the Highlander fuel gauge and low fuel warning system had TOO LITTLE reserve when EMPTY was indicated. My good friend took his in to be TSB reprogrammed to INCREASE reserve at indicated EMPTY. Now, on the TX/GH, some are complaining about just the opposite.
Can't please everybody, all the time.
Last edited by Stonebender; Jan 29, 2026 at 07:03 AM.
Lead Lap
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 3,958
Likes: 409
The only car I've ever had (and I've had MANY, from a 1962 Chevy Biscayne to a current 2026 Lexus TX 500h) that had a perfectly linear fuel gauge was my 2008 Toyota Sequoia, which STILL had significant fuel above "full" and reserve below "empty". But in the middle, 1/4 of what was left meant 1/4 of what was left, etc. And that was a digital gauge masquerading as analog.
The current (2026) TX500h is not too bad. Like most cars the owner FIRST has to realize there are SIX fuel "segments" to the meter. Above full (as in ALL cars), reserve below EMPTY (as in all cars) and the four segments in between, On mine, 1/2 tank as indicated is almost exactly 1/2 tank. On average, the top five "segments" are about 3.2 gallons each - but its NOT precisely linear, though you'd think a digital gauge could be linearized with a simple calculation.
I think the problem is TOO MUCH information, not inaccuracy. It looks to me like owners are taking the estimated DTE range as gospel and forgetting about the gauge, not realizing its just an ESTIMATE based on past driving - which can change from tank to tank and even over just a few miles
And a lot of anxiety against using the full usable fuel tank capacity exists despite TWO additional steps of low fuel monitoring: 1. The LOW FUEL icon, which comes on first, and then the: 2. REFUEL NOW indicator, which means the car believes its down to its final reserve. Meaning you CAN go further (but should find a gas station REAL soon).
And even more anxiety is common about actually filling up the tank, with widespread belief that the first "click off" during fast fill means the tank is FULL. Nope. Never does. Check the SAE standard for fill technique. And for Pete's sake, do the final fill S L O W L Y. Ever try filling a 1 gallon glass bottle FAST, all the way? It'll spit back as it approaches about 1/4 full, even though it's NOT full.
Not filling up the tank completely + not driving until its down to reserve = greatly reduced APPARENT fuel tank capacity.
BTW ... SOP back in the day was to NEVER let the fuel gauge go below 1/4, precisely because the gauges sometime meant "empty" right at or above "EMPTY" ('74 Cadillac Coupe DeVille and '62 Chevy Biscayne, for example). And the 2nd gen Nissan 300ZX actually had TWO fuel gauges to help with "range anxiety" - the 2nd one for just the last 1/8 tank.
The Biscayne tank was about 16 gallons as I recall - smaller than the TX. MANY of my cars had 16 (usable) gallon tanks. And a few were "rolling oil fields" that held 30+ gallons.
One of my current analog gauge cars is a classic whose gauge more or less reads "No fuel" or "some fuel". This was not a cheap car either.
My conclusions? Read the fuel gauge on the TX500h, take the DTE as an advisement that is very approximate (as it is on ALL cars), and if you're upset about range - drive the car until LOW FUEL and REFUEL NOW comes on. THEN fill up the tank completely using the method used to rate its capacity in the first place (fast fill/slow fill/slow fill).
And if THAT does not work, perhaps on an older production run, check to see if there is a TSB that applies.
Back in 2020, MANY owners complained that the Highlander fuel gauge and low fuel warning system had TOO LITTLE reserve when EMPTY was indicated. My good friend took his in to be TSB reprogrammed to INCREASE reserve at indicated EMPTY. Now, on the TX/GH, some are complaining about just the opposite.
Can't please everybody, all the time.
The current (2026) TX500h is not too bad. Like most cars the owner FIRST has to realize there are SIX fuel "segments" to the meter. Above full (as in ALL cars), reserve below EMPTY (as in all cars) and the four segments in between, On mine, 1/2 tank as indicated is almost exactly 1/2 tank. On average, the top five "segments" are about 3.2 gallons each - but its NOT precisely linear, though you'd think a digital gauge could be linearized with a simple calculation.
I think the problem is TOO MUCH information, not inaccuracy. It looks to me like owners are taking the estimated DTE range as gospel and forgetting about the gauge, not realizing its just an ESTIMATE based on past driving - which can change from tank to tank and even over just a few miles
And a lot of anxiety against using the full usable fuel tank capacity exists despite TWO additional steps of low fuel monitoring: 1. The LOW FUEL icon, which comes on first, and then the: 2. REFUEL NOW indicator, which means the car believes its down to its final reserve. Meaning you CAN go further (but should find a gas station REAL soon).
And even more anxiety is common about actually filling up the tank, with widespread belief that the first "click off" during fast fill means the tank is FULL. Nope. Never does. Check the SAE standard for fill technique. And for Pete's sake, do the final fill S L O W L Y. Ever try filling a 1 gallon glass bottle FAST, all the way? It'll spit back as it approaches about 1/4 full, even though it's NOT full.
Not filling up the tank completely + not driving until its down to reserve = greatly reduced APPARENT fuel tank capacity.
BTW ... SOP back in the day was to NEVER let the fuel gauge go below 1/4, precisely because the gauges sometime meant "empty" right at or above "EMPTY" ('74 Cadillac Coupe DeVille and '62 Chevy Biscayne, for example). And the 2nd gen Nissan 300ZX actually had TWO fuel gauges to help with "range anxiety" - the 2nd one for just the last 1/8 tank.
The Biscayne tank was about 16 gallons as I recall - smaller than the TX. MANY of my cars had 16 (usable) gallon tanks. And a few were "rolling oil fields" that held 30+ gallons.
One of my current analog gauge cars is a classic whose gauge more or less reads "No fuel" or "some fuel". This was not a cheap car either.
My conclusions? Read the fuel gauge on the TX500h, take the DTE as an advisement that is very approximate (as it is on ALL cars), and if you're upset about range - drive the car until LOW FUEL and REFUEL NOW comes on. THEN fill up the tank completely using the method used to rate its capacity in the first place (fast fill/slow fill/slow fill).
And if THAT does not work, perhaps on an older production run, check to see if there is a TSB that applies.
Back in 2020, MANY owners complained that the Highlander fuel gauge and low fuel warning system had TOO LITTLE reserve when EMPTY was indicated. My good friend took his in to be TSB reprogrammed to INCREASE reserve at indicated EMPTY. Now, on the TX/GH, some are complaining about just the opposite.
Can't please everybody, all the time.
1st Gear
Joined: May 2026
Posts: 1
Likes: 1
I have a 2025 TX 500h and happen to ask a Service advisor last week when I went to service my 2024 NX if there were any updates. Turns out in April of 2026 there was a Technical Service Bulletin to address this issue (Software Update). I dropped off this morning and will pick up later today. Fingers Crossed this will address issue.
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
Joined: Feb 2025
Posts: 22
Likes: 15
Thanks so much for the new Service Bulletin link. I just sent it to my service manager to have him look at what they did to our TX 500h in February. There was a service bulletin that came out for the Grand Highlander Hybrid in August 2025. It is titled exactly like the Lexus service bulletin. When I became aware of the Grand Highlander service bulletin, I had several conversations with the Executive Lexus Engagement Center and Lexus Dispute Department. Lexus arranged to have the range issue for our TX500h addressed February 2026 before this April 2026 Low Fuel Enhancement service bulletin was issued. I am now trying to see if what they did in February to our TX 500h is what Lexus is addressing with this official service bulletin T-SB-0060-25. Since February 2026, we have driven the car for several fill ups and miles to see if the February adjustment made a difference. We record all the mileage, range, capacity, average speed, etc at every fill up. We may get a little more capacity 14 gallons max after 2 top offs vs 13 gallons max but I can't say the range has improved. The range is my complaint. The implication by Lexus is that our car has a 17.2 gal. fuel tank capacity and multiply that by 27/28 miles per gallon. We should get in the neighborhood of 459/476 mile on a tank of gas. Of course, you are not going to drain the tank and not going to get the mpg that Lexus advertises to sell the car. Our range continues to be in the 380 to 390 range for fill up. On average, we are getting around 23 mpg. My point is Lexus implies mileage that really is not achievable with our car. The range implication is a feature that really catches the eye of the consumer. We like the car but the range is truly a big disappointment. I would not be spending so much time on this issue but it is the principal of the matter. If I have read recent comments correctly, there could be a solution. From what I have read, it seems like the 2026 TX500h may have better range. That is wonderful and maybe Lexus has addressed the issue with the new cars.
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
Joined: Feb 2025
Posts: 22
Likes: 15
It could be the squeaky wheel getting the grease. I have been on Lexus since we bought the car in April 2024. They will not admit there is a problem but will say something like let us look at it and see what we can do. The first diagnosis by a Lexus (FTS) Field Tech Specialist was in Feb. 2025. The service paperwork stated that the fuel tank had a deformation. The prescription was to replace the deformation with a newly redesigned tank. That never happened! I contacted them for months about when the replacement tank fix was going to occur. The reason they addressed my problem was that I filed a Lemon Law complaint. In December of 2025, I was told that it was a software issue not a fuel tank deformation. It is all sketchy. The company does enough to say they are addressing the problem . We have extensive documentation about mileage and range that we have recorded for over 2 years. It is still a concern and I will continue to address this problem. The car continues to depreciate because of age and mileage. If the car is declared a lemon, the buy back becomes less and less as time progresses. It bothers me enough that I keep the posts going and hope others will bombard Lexus with this issue. I hate that any model is having this problem. I think range should be posted on the sticker as well as mpg and fuel tank size. That information would make it very transparent. The big cover up is - it all depends on driving conditions. We are not rip roaring teenagers just Joe normal. The car should be able to fill up close to 16 gallons when it is close to empty. That is not happening. It is more in the 13-14 gallon capacity. It is the principle of what is being advertised for sales and what is really actual. You do not know about range and capacity until you own the car. I think there are quite a few people that don't even know and might not care that this issue exists. I'm sure this doesn't make you feel any better about your TX350 but is a possible answer to your question. I feel your pain!
Pit Crew
Joined: Oct 2025
Posts: 240
Likes: 70
From: Florida
It could be the squeaky wheel getting the grease. I have been on Lexus since we bought the car in April 2024. They will not admit there is a problem but will say something like let us look at it and see what we can do. The first diagnosis by a Lexus (FTS) Field Tech Specialist was in Feb. 2025. The service paperwork stated that the fuel tank had a deformation. The prescription was to replace the deformation with a newly redesigned tank. That never happened! I contacted them for months about when the replacement tank fix was going to occur. The reason they addressed my problem was that I filed a Lemon Law complaint. In December of 2025, I was told that it was a software issue not a fuel tank deformation. It is all sketchy. The company does enough to say they are addressing the problem . We have extensive documentation about mileage and range that we have recorded for over 2 years. It is still a concern and I will continue to address this problem. The car continues to depreciate because of age and mileage. If the car is declared a lemon, the buy back becomes less and less as time progresses. It bothers me enough that I keep the posts going and hope others will bombard Lexus with this issue. I hate that any model is having this problem. I think range should be posted on the sticker as well as mpg and fuel tank size. That information would make it very transparent. The big cover up is - it all depends on driving conditions. We are not rip roaring teenagers just Joe normal. The car should be able to fill up close to 16 gallons when it is close to empty. That is not happening. It is more in the 13-14 gallon capacity. It is the principle of what is being advertised for sales and what is really actual. You do not know about range and capacity until you own the car. I think there are quite a few people that don't even know and might not care that this issue exists. I'm sure this doesn't make you feel any better about your TX350 but is a possible answer to your question. I feel your pain!
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
Joined: Feb 2025
Posts: 22
Likes: 15
I hate it for you and I truly know how you feel. I also think the problem could be a monetary issue for Lexus. The true fix could be very expensive for the early models. It may be the best thing to address and make improvements on the newest models. They know they have a problem but addressing it could be a financial cost. I'm not sure what the deal is. I know that Lexus knows this is an issue. They have done just enough to kick the can down the road and try to make people give up on the problem. It is not a safety issue which they would have to address. They have had many NHTSA recalls with the TX and that had to cost some money and many headaches. This issue is a thorn in the side but does not have to be addressed immediately. The Lexus Brand Engagement Center whether it is the first level or the "Executive" Lexus Brand Engagement ceter group are experts at shooting their best lines but are of very little help. The communication that has the most bite is filing a Lemon Law grievance after you have notified Lexus multiple times about the issue as well as giving them opportunity to fix it. Good luck with your situation. I am still working our fuel capacity and range issue. Currently, I am waiting for some input from the dealer about the new TSB that has been released. It has not been determined if our car has had it done in February before it had a TSB name.
