GS F (2016-present) Discussion topics related to the GS F model

Intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-19, 12:37 PM
  #1  
Bogardian
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
Bogardian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Texas
Posts: 11
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Intake

I am new to the team, so there may already be a thread for this...

Which intake did you go with? I really like the carbon fiber look of RR Racing, but I am guessing that Takeda sounds better. Interested in hearing your thoughts on the intake you chose. Cheers!

Pic for attention:

Old 05-15-19, 02:40 PM
  #2  
jonez
Pit Crew
 
jonez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: MA
Posts: 212
Received 103 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

​​Went with RR Racing for the look and so I can pair it with the RR Racing heatshield.

No noticeable difference in sound but that’s ok because I’m doing headers and full exhaust so the sound is going to be changing in a big way soon anyways.


The following 3 users liked this post by jonez:
1wacko (12-18-19), Bogardian (05-15-19), RRRacing (03-20-20)
Old 05-16-19, 02:12 AM
  #3  
designo
Pole Position
iTrader: (6)
 
designo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 3,373
Received 446 Likes on 283 Posts
Default

The only way you will get a difference in intake sound is if you install a cone filter type.
And Takeda offer that.
The following users liked this post:
jonez (05-16-19)
Old 05-16-19, 04:09 AM
  #4  
Marth06
Driver School Candidate
 
Marth06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: WA Australia
Posts: 23
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I thinking about changing the intake too .....but is it worth it? Does it improve anything?
Old 05-16-19, 06:39 AM
  #5  
Bogardian
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
Bogardian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Texas
Posts: 11
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

RR Racing claims that the heat reduction nets HP increase from the heat shield. But i am always reluctant to believe a vendor website. Perhaps someone has done their own dyno to support this claim?
Old 05-16-19, 10:07 AM
  #6  
Meraki Autoworks
Your #1 Lexus Vendor
iTrader: (8)
 
Meraki Autoworks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: CA - USA
Posts: 18,478
Received 668 Likes on 590 Posts
Default

We can do the Takeda one for you. We have sold many to RCF/GSF owners.

-Josh
__________________

Your #1 Dealer for Aftermarket Performance Products
Orange County, CA
Email: info@merakiautoworks.com
Text/Call: 213 394 2886
Website: www.MerakiAutoworks.com
The following users liked this post:
nveddy (03-05-20)
Old 05-16-19, 10:52 PM
  #7  
gsfuji
Driver School Candidate
 
gsfuji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: ga
Posts: 32
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I went with Tom’s carbon intake, it’s been a while since I’ve had it installed but it did make a small sound difference not a whole lot and I did notice a slight torque increase, more air flow. sound difference will come from headers or a mid pipe


Originally Posted by Bogardian
I am new to the team, so there may already be a thread for this...

Which intake did you go with? I really like the carbon fiber look of RR Racing, but I am guessing that Takeda sounds better. Interested in hearing your thoughts on the intake you chose. Cheers!

Pic for attention:


The following 5 users liked this post by gsfuji:
1wacko (12-18-19), Bogardian (05-18-19), IMAGINTHAT (04-29-20), nigel821 (01-01-21), RC51TOFUMA (05-24-19)
Old 05-17-19, 07:08 AM
  #8  
NotFSport
Pit Crew
 
NotFSport's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: FL
Posts: 125
Received 47 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Is there any significant difference between the Tom's intake and the RR Racing elbow? I don't know enough about carbon fiber to know if there would be any appreciable difference.
Old 05-19-19, 01:29 AM
  #9  
TOPENDMS
Former Sponsor
 
TOPENDMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: CT
Posts: 1,461
Received 117 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NotFSport
Is there any significant difference between the Tom's intake and the RR Racing elbow? I don't know enough about carbon fiber to know if there would be any appreciable difference.
It looks like RR Racing intake may remove the crankcase vent pipes?
Old 05-19-19, 10:53 AM
  #10  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,207
Received 3,849 Likes on 2,334 Posts
Default

Those are not actually vents, they're air intakes for the crankcase. RR Racing moves the tubes to a small filter at the back of the engine - see the little blue oiled cotton gauze filter behind the engine in their picture? This also changes the engine's tuning. When the tubes pull from the big intake, the MAF measures all the air entering the engine. With the RR Racing setup, the air being pulled through the crankcase is unmetered. Lexus did the same thing on the CCS race cars.
The following 4 users liked this post by lobuxracer:
1wacko (10-28-19), Bogardian (05-19-19), finny76 (05-28-19), IMAGINTHAT (05-24-19)
Old 05-19-19, 01:54 PM
  #11  
johnnyb58
Driver School Candidate
 
johnnyb58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: CA
Posts: 30
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lobuxracer
Those are not actually vents, they're air intakes for the crankcase. RR Racing moves the tubes to a small filter at the back of the engine - see the little blue oiled cotton gauze filter behind the engine in their picture? This also changes the engine's tuning. When the tubes pull from the big intake, the MAF measures all the air entering the engine. With the RR Racing setup, the air being pulled through the crankcase is unmetered. Lexus did the same thing on the CCS race cars.
Is there a benefit between these 2 setup? Which one would you prefer?

Thanks!
Old 05-19-19, 03:18 PM
  #12  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,207
Received 3,849 Likes on 2,334 Posts
Default

I am not a fan of oiled gauze filters. They're not very good at filtering IME. They're really good at creating an ongoing maintenance task though. If I wanted to do something like this, I'd keep the OEM configuration.
Old 05-24-19, 08:02 AM
  #13  
COisF
Rookie
iTrader: (2)
 
COisF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Thinking about switching it up to the Tom’s setup if there are any long term reliability concerns due to venting the crankcase differently with my RR Racing intake. Aside from maintenance on the mini oiled filter are there other unknowns...maybe someone from RR Racing can weigh in?
The following users liked this post:
RC51TOFUMA (05-24-19)
Old 05-25-19, 03:20 PM
  #14  
bigz187
Driver
 
bigz187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: TX
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 21 Posts
Default


The following 2 users liked this post by bigz187:
Bogardian (05-28-19), designo (06-08-19)
Old 05-25-19, 03:22 PM
  #15  
bigz187
Driver
 
bigz187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: TX
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

I went with the AEM intake with carbon fiber heat shield and never looked back. Great sounds and build quality. Had the RR racing intake elbow and heat shield and returned it. It had fitment issues with the heat shield and couldn't justify it for the money.
The following 2 users liked this post by bigz187:
Bogardian (05-28-19), designo (06-08-19)


Quick Reply: Intake



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:15 PM.