The car you most regret selling
Skidpad figures:
LS400: 0.81G ~ 62.6 MPH Slalom
LS430: 0.73G ~ 61.0 MPH Slalom
LS460: 0.82G ~ 63.0 MPH Slalom
Point is, the LS430 is a significantly sloppier handling car than the LS400 or LS460 without being a significantly harder riding car, which all in all is why I feel its the least satisfying LS to drive.
Last edited by SW17LS; Oct 16, 2017 at 06:52 PM.
LS400: 0.81G ~ 62.6 MPH Slalom
LS430: 0.73G ~ 61.0 MPH Slalom
LS460: 0.82G ~ 63.0 MPH Slalom
Point is, the LS430 is a significantly sloppier handling car than the LS400 or LS460 without being a significantly harder riding car, which all in all is why I feel its the least satisfying LS to drive.
Its not about the skidpad number, its about what it represents. Its not just an arbitrary number somebody brags about, its a result of the suspension tuning of the car. While LS drivers don't care about the skidpad number, they DO care about the way the car feels and drives...which is impacted by the same suspension tuning that causes the skidpad result.And tires don't make a .8G difference unless one car has snow tires.
The skidpad and slalom numbers I posted above are a RWD non F Sport LS460. The point is to illustrate the similarity of the LS400 (the original LS) and the LS460 in those tests, and the significant departure with the LS430.
But we are off topic here. So, while I miss the LS400 at times, I don't regret getting rid of it.
Last edited by SW17LS; Oct 16, 2017 at 07:13 PM.
Its not about the skidpad number, its about what it represents. Its not just an arbitrary number somebody brags about, its a result of the suspension tuning of the car. While LS drivers don't care about the skidpad number, they DO care about the way the car feels and drives...which is impacted by the same suspension tuning that causes the skidpad result.And tires don't make a .8G difference unless one car has snow tires.
The skidpad and slalom numbers I posted above are a RWD non F Sport LS460. The point is to illustrate the similarity of the LS400 (the original LS) and the LS460 in those tests, and the significant departure with the LS430.
OK...as far as I'm concerned, let's drop it. No sense going on and on. Let some other posters get a word in the thread, on the cars they miss the most. I suppose, for at least some of us, in ten or fifteen years, we'll be looking back on cars we actually drove ourselves LOL.
I sold my first corvette about 2 years ago, a black 2000 FRC and felt nothing but relief and joy when it was gone, I figired id feel the same after the second one but I don't





Corvette drivetrain , bigger body , updated looks, I think they are a good buy
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
But we often find ourselves selling cars because maybe that car became "difficult" and we didn't want to deal with its issues. Then, years later we found out that it was a great car.
My personal guilt list, which will also age me to a certain extent. No original pics so these are web pics.
1970's era big block Pontiac Gran Prix. Yikes, what a beast! Yep, also a problematic car but a fun car too. 400 big block smogged up motor, but a heck of a lot of get up and go. Nice personality, brutish. I had the beautiful olive green.

Steve
Also, before that I owned a 1972 Grand Prix like pictured above. Mine was the equivalent color to british racing green with a tan interior. As stated above, the car would flat move, and back then the speed limit was 75 so everybody drove 80-90 mph on the interstate. Ordered it with a factory installed 8 Track that was mounted facing the front on hump in back floor.















