Rear Window Visor
05-12-10, 07:52 AM
#16
Yeah I have that first one on my car. I got a good deal on it back when there weren't many sellers. After a while though I did have to use some rubber cement to stick it back down on the corners because pollen loosened up the tape's bond somehow.... Stupid spring time.
But other than that the fitment is pretty good
But other than that the fitment is pretty good
05-12-10, 09:55 AM
#22
Original makers were HIC.. i saw one on ebay and i knew it was gonna be sold quick so i bought it. Sent me the wrong one contacted them and they sent another one right away. Good customer service. The fitment on mine was nearly perfect except that one of edges do not fit.. Maybe i put it on wrong?
05-12-10, 10:07 AM
#24
Pole Position
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fl
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I guess I'll be the voice of dissent today ... I don't like either of them. My reasons for not biting are as follows:
1) Too small. I want something that is functional while making the car loog good as well. These shades are too small to help keep the rear deck cool.
2) Both shades appear to be made of that same cheap-looking acylic that those side window shades are made of. IMHO it cheapens the look of the vehicle.
3) Along with 2) above the lack of color choices is a detractor.
IMHO these are just glorified $100+ side shades. If they sold them so that they came in OEM colors (Like my DWP) and were deeper (protected the rear deck more) I would probably buy.
... just my opinion.
1) Too small. I want something that is functional while making the car loog good as well. These shades are too small to help keep the rear deck cool.
2) Both shades appear to be made of that same cheap-looking acylic that those side window shades are made of. IMHO it cheapens the look of the vehicle.
3) Along with 2) above the lack of color choices is a detractor.
IMHO these are just glorified $100+ side shades. If they sold them so that they came in OEM colors (Like my DWP) and were deeper (protected the rear deck more) I would probably buy.
... just my opinion.
05-12-10, 10:35 AM
#25
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I guess I'll be the voice of dissent today ... I don't like either of them. My reasons for not biting are as follows:
1) Too small. I want something that is functional while making the car loog good as well. These shades are too small to help keep the rear deck cool.
2) Both shades appear to be made of that same cheap-looking acylic that those side window shades are made of. IMHO it cheapens the look of the vehicle.
3) Along with 2) above the lack of color choices is a detractor.
IMHO these are just glorified $100+ side shades. If they sold them so that they came in OEM colors (Like my DWP) and were deeper (protected the rear deck more) I would probably buy.
... just my opinion.
1) Too small. I want something that is functional while making the car loog good as well. These shades are too small to help keep the rear deck cool.
2) Both shades appear to be made of that same cheap-looking acylic that those side window shades are made of. IMHO it cheapens the look of the vehicle.
3) Along with 2) above the lack of color choices is a detractor.
IMHO these are just glorified $100+ side shades. If they sold them so that they came in OEM colors (Like my DWP) and were deeper (protected the rear deck more) I would probably buy.
... just my opinion.
I guess the other side of the coin is that if you have window visors, the spoiler matches them pretty close, kinda tying them all together.
05-12-10, 10:45 AM
#27
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: VA
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think I'm getting one, I removed my origin roof spoiler because it didn't flow with the car so it's now sitting in my attic gathering dust. It was also $50 more than this thing costs.
