Notices
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)

Yet another Weight Reduction Topic

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 03:40 PM
  #46  
Gunnar's Avatar
Gunnar
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,626
Likes: 8
From: Kansas City
Default

Brendon, go sit in a MKIV Supra seat and you'll see how much stock (at least 92-96) seats suck.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 05:01 PM
  #47  
5sp_jzz30's Avatar
5sp_jzz30
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,560
Likes: 7
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by Brendon
Wow a lot of negative opinion of the stock seats. Are they really that bad? Mine feel so soft and cushiony. I love them; I just don't need the extra weight the power and heating puts on. I've read online that for the 97+, the seats were softer. Is that true? I'll have to ride in a pre-97 to feel how hard the older ones were. Anyways, how much does the traction control and ABS weigh?

BTW, if the sunroof does weigh 60-70 lbs, that's alot! Since removing my spare tire (which is just 50 lbs), my car feels much more agile around town. Yeah, on the highways I don't notice much difference, but from the stoplights, it feels much more responsive. The same thing when I keep my tank below 1/2 full. Every 50 or so lbs you drop, the car's 0-60 improves by a tenth, at least thats what my calculations tell me.
all sc seats feel the same. soft and dont hold you in. the older ones feel stiffer due to old hard leather lol

Originally Posted by over40driv
Not to mention the advantage of the high center of gravity from that weight loss. Something else, my headliner is in perfect cond. and a new headliner from Lexus if you remove the sunroof, is like$250.00, not installed. If you wanted to be hardcore you could leave out the headliner, wouldnt look to good. If someone fabbed a c.f. panel for the roof, maybe it could be extended to bolt to the orig. sunroof mounts and would also be a roof brace.
again....making functional CF is VERY expensive. the sunroof delete option would only be for looks.

Originally Posted by Gunnar
Brendon, go sit in a MKIV Supra seat and you'll see how much stock (at least 92-96) seats suck.
that why i got rid of mine. power and heat? who needs that. i got comfort and sportiness. that beats it any day...even if its 0* outside
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 08:01 PM
  #48  
StiCk3's Avatar
StiCk3
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,892
Likes: 0
From: IN
Default

Originally Posted by Brendon
Wow a lot of negative opinion of the stock seats. Are they really that bad? Mine feel so soft and cushiony. I love them; I just don't need the extra weight the power and heating puts on. I've read online that for the 97+, the seats were softer. Is that true? I'll have to ride in a pre-97 to feel how hard the older ones were. Anyways, how much does the traction control and ABS weigh?
The stock seats are great in terms of comfort, good for long road trips. Unfortunatly, you take that comfort to the track and you're butt isnt going to stay in one place. The supra seats are sooooo much more supportive but they don't have as much padding as the SC seats. IMO, thats a decent sacrifice for performance. I have some up in my attic and will get them downstairs as soon as my car comes back from its paint job.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 08:27 PM
  #49  
unreal-'s Avatar
unreal-
Pole Position
CL Folding 10,000
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 257
Likes: 2
From: New Jersey
Default

Anybody running RSX seats? i wanted to eventually upgrade to them
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mate01
GS - 2nd Gen (1998-2005)
6
Sep 4, 2016 03:17 PM
Billmyers
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
1
Jul 6, 2012 12:37 PM
over40driv
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
120
Aug 17, 2010 06:25 PM
ZenkiS14
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
36
Sep 12, 2009 11:18 PM
strongsail
Wheels and Tires Classifieds
2
Nov 23, 2007 01:36 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:00 PM.