Notices
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)

t-25?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 2, 2008 | 02:20 AM
  #16  
Spooled's Avatar
Spooled
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 532
Likes: 2
From: AZ
Default

Regardless, I'm just partial to DSMs cause they were my first cars. Sheps 4G63 isnt the only one I was talking about, there's plenty of DSMs that hold their own, but just as many 2j's too. I just sold my 90 Talon AWD turbo for a 99 SC300. I just feel out of place on DSM forums

Crankwalk - (which seems to be the only stereotype people can come up with, next to "always breaking").....easy fix, 6-bolt.

None the less, either T25 is one of the worst choices for a NA-T. If you're thinking that small, I wouldnt go any smaller than a EvoIII big16G.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2008 | 06:39 AM
  #17  
turbodremz's Avatar
turbodremz
Thread Starter
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,870
Likes: 7
From: TX
Default

i know dsm's arent great..i had a 92 plymoth laser, with a jdm 4g63-t, and yes it did suck stock on the freeway, but it didnt have a t25..it was a small 14g..

to be all honest, i dont even know why i asked about a t25 on a 2jz. i know better than that. not even a ka24de with a "hot cam" swap does good with a t25 cause of the poor flow rates and low efficiency.

from what i read this morning, i think its safe to say that i will be aiming a bit higher when sober..ct26 or 60-1 turbo would be much more reasonable, but i'm worried about off the line drag...my car kinda sucks the way it is now cause its auto, and i dont have plans on doing a swap anytime soon, and i want to keep my na-t project as inexpensive as possible..
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SCFactory
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
0
May 26, 2015 06:03 PM
SOLEdier
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
25
Jan 20, 2011 07:34 AM
kleen1JZSC
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
24
Mar 10, 2010 07:10 PM
indypwr
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
5
Apr 2, 2004 02:37 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:31 PM.