Notices
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)

SC300 Cross Floor stabilizing Bar

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2006 | 05:50 PM
  #16  
xirforever's Avatar
xirforever
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Default

Originally Posted by Idrewfelix
A bunch of bars that marginally do nothing but add more weight to an already heavy car
im not sure why you would try to argue with his opinion on what looks good...
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2006 | 08:40 PM
  #17  
SUPRMSC's Avatar
SUPRMSC
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 0
From: Classified
Default

Originally Posted by xirforever
im not sure why you would try to argue with his opinion on what looks good...
I'm describing that his "bunch of bars" were originally for marginal chassis stability, and yet he appreciates the worthless anesthetic value of it. And sometimes on CL, your opinion is politically incorrect.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2006 | 11:25 PM
  #18  
xirforever's Avatar
xirforever
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Default

Originally Posted by Idrewfelix
I'm describing that his "bunch of bars" were originally for marginal chassis stability, and yet he appreciates the worthless anesthetic value of it. And sometimes on CL, your opinion is politically incorrect.
I think that everyone that has ever been insterested in cars realizes that some poeple like show over functionality. Personally i dont think its right to put him down for it, maybe thats just me. He simply likes the way it looks even if it may not surve a great deal of functionality. I cant see how someone stating their opinion would be politically incorrect, if anything, respecting the opinions of others would be politically correct.

Last edited by xirforever; Dec 22, 2006 at 11:31 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2006 | 03:50 PM
  #19  
$C300's Avatar
$C300
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 1
From: SO-CAL
Default

Dose any one have a pic of the back seat area of our cars (striped).

And guys can we please keep this tread on track
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2006 | 01:09 AM
  #20  
dejacky's Avatar
dejacky
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
From: Behind you
Default

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but Do-Luck does not make one of those interior crossbars for the sc300 because the sc300 doesn't need it (unlike the targa top supras).
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2006 | 01:12 AM
  #21  
$C300's Avatar
$C300
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 1
From: SO-CAL
Default

dejacky if you going to be disrespectful feel free NOT to post on my threads.

Last edited by $C300; Dec 26, 2006 at 01:21 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2006 | 02:12 AM
  #22  
SUPRMSC's Avatar
SUPRMSC
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 0
From: Classified
Default

Maybe you guys should just leave politics out of your signatures and just discuss it at the clubhouse? They even have their own section for political debates.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2006 | 01:18 PM
  #23  
dejacky's Avatar
dejacky
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
From: Behind you
Default

Originally Posted by $C300
dejacky if you going to be disrespectful feel free NOT to post on my threads.
How is posting "on topic" in a thread disrespectful? Anyways, an interior rear cross-bar will not noticeably help the sc300 chassis because it's design does not flex much in that region at all. You would think if the sc300 really benefitted from an internal rear cross-bar, Do-Luck would make one. Since the sc300 shell has a hard top and that internal rear region of the car is already stiff, an internal cross bar won't significantly improve chassis rigidity. Since the targa top supras do not have a hard top to help compose the shell, it has less rigidity, thus more flex. The internal crossbar in a supra can definitely stiffen the chassis up because it flexes due to open top (less reinforcement).
Proof:

Lexus SC300 Do-Luck Products (No rear cross-bar product):
http://do-luck-usa.com/products.html?auto=JZZ30

mkiv Supra Do-Luck Products (There is a rear cross-bar product):
http://www.do-luck-usa.com/products.html?auto=JZA80-1
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2006 | 01:55 PM
  #24  
5spdSC300's Avatar
5spdSC300
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by dejacky
Since the sc300 shell has a hard top and that internal rear region of the car is already stiff, an internal cross bar won't significantly improve chassis rigidity. Since the targa top supras do not have a hard top to help compose the shell, it has less rigidity, thus more flex. The internal crossbar in a supra can definitely stiffen the chassis up because it flexes due to open top (less reinforcement).
I agree with what you have to say about the floor bar probably not doing much but your logic behind your "proof" if flawed. Just because Do-Luck makes a floor bar for the mkiv supra and not the sc300 is not proof of anything. Going off what you stated above, 300zx, mr2, nsx, and mkiii supras being t tops or targas and would probably greatly benefit form a floor bar but just because Do-Luck doesn’t make one means those cars don’t benefit from it ? Proof does not lie in what a certain company produces but actual facts and data.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2006 | 09:22 PM
  #25  
dejacky's Avatar
dejacky
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
From: Behind you
Wink

Originally Posted by 5spdSC300
I agree with what you have to say about the floor bar probably not doing much but your logic behind your "proof" if flawed. Just because Do-Luck makes a floor bar for the mkiv supra and not the sc300 is not proof of anything. Going off what you stated above, 300zx, mr2, nsx, and mkiii supras being t tops or targas and would probably greatly benefit form a floor bar but just because Do-Luck doesn’t make one means those cars don’t benefit from it ? Proof does not lie in what a certain company produces but actual facts and data.
My logic is not flawed. meh, I just made a lazy semantic error using the word "proof." It's not exactly a proof, it's just evidence showing that if there was a signicant-NOTICEABLE-TO-THE-AVERAGE-JOE improvement to be made that would GREATLY benefit all sc300's, someone would have made an internal rear cross-bar by now.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2006 | 10:24 PM
  #26  
Boostshakalaka's Avatar
Boostshakalaka
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 629
Likes: 1
From: Hawaii
Default

Originally Posted by Idrewfelix
A bunch of bars that marginally do nothing but add more weight to an already heavy car
dude are you serious?

go drive a car with a cage and drive one without, the difference is night and day. you have no right to talk about other people adding weight to the car, last i checked you went with a dual exhaust

oh btw i dont think having a bunch of bars is sexy because it looks good, i think its sexy because of how stiff the chassis becomes. hopefully in the next year i plan to get a 6pt cage and have the chassis stitch welded

yea i guess i was wrong that do luck made for the sc, but back in the day on this forum there was a member by the handle turbob6, he had the supra do luck cross bar on his sc, and said it helped out quite a bit
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2006 | 10:31 PM
  #27  
Boostshakalaka's Avatar
Boostshakalaka
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 629
Likes: 1
From: Hawaii
Default

Originally Posted by Idrewfelix
I'm describing that his "bunch of bars" were originally for marginal chassis stability, and yet he appreciates the worthless anesthetic value of it. And sometimes on CL, your opinion is politically incorrect.
how are you able to criticize me on my opinion on suspension and chassis stiffening? last i checked you were running teins, everybody who actually tracks their cars knows that teins are for posers
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2006 | 10:59 PM
  #28  
$C300's Avatar
$C300
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 1
From: SO-CAL
Default

First off, I had some work done on my quarter panel (its fine now) but I just though it might help out a bit, I really don’t see a negative side to installing a rear floor stabilizing bar.

Btw Do-Luck makes a rear ladder bar for the SC
http://intensepower.com/dolrearladba.html

And Floor support bars
http://intensepower.com/dolfloorsupb.html

Last edited by $C300; Dec 27, 2006 at 12:09 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2006 | 11:16 PM
  #29  
Sly Guy Yu's Avatar
Sly Guy Yu
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by Boostshakalaka
how are you able to criticize me on my opinion on suspension and chassis stiffening? last i checked you were running teins, everybody who actually tracks their cars knows that teins are for posers


LOL.....


So True.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2006 | 12:54 PM
  #30  
DriftGirl's Avatar
DriftGirl
Pole Position
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,400
Likes: 22
From: Wa
Default

I run DoLuck Latter bars & floor support.

Cusco cage,TRD STB, Junsei CF Harness bar and a few other suspension 'things'. And a Rear strut tower...for ****s n giggles

Ive also got a stock SC that I used to drive to work and the difference is like night and day vs the 400 with suspension work.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:31 AM.