Notices
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)

will lexus ever bring sc400 back?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 07:04 PM
  #16  
TRD_Power's Avatar
TRD_Power
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,527
Likes: 78
From: Crappy ol' Texas
Default

Ugh... The LF-A's front end is so disgusting! Everything else is badass though!
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 08:01 PM
  #17  
PsiQo1's Avatar
PsiQo1
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

the lf-a is pure sex!
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 08:20 PM
  #18  
LEXuriouss's Avatar
LEXuriouss
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: VANCOUVER BC CANADA !!!
Default

sex!! yes i agree!!! 3 pipes!

lol
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 02:55 AM
  #19  
bigmalik00's Avatar
bigmalik00
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 1
From: MD
Default

I don't know... I love the SC430.... its just a change..maybe more of a change than the different GS's but you can't deny its new functions... at that time there were very few retractable roofs..and that car is not small in the cockpit...maybe the back seat but no one rides in my back seat but my 5 year old...a man doesn't need a back seat....maybe in a jeep!
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 05:40 AM
  #20  
94lex83457's Avatar
94lex83457
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
From: OR
Default

now the thing I don't understand is why the SC430 has fewer HP (288) than the 1998+ SC400 (290). Tq was boosted from 300 to 317, and the SC430 is quicker to 60MPH (5.8 vs 6.3) but come on; for a .3 liter increase there should have been a greater performance gain.

Can somebody explain the logic behind this...??
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 05:53 AM
  #21  
sc250tt's Avatar
sc250tt
Pole Position
15 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,873
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Default

altough you only see rich older folks or beautiful women driving it i still like it the only reason i dont have one yet is because i cant afford it .maby if i sell my sc's i can .but i'll just wait couple more years for it
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 06:32 AM
  #22  
BiZ's Avatar
BiZ
Intermediate
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by 94lex83457
now the thing I don't understand is why the SC430 has fewer HP (288) than the 1998+ SC400 (290). Tq was boosted from 300 to 317, and the SC430 is quicker to 60MPH (5.8 vs 6.3) but come on; for a .3 liter increase there should have been a greater performance gain.

Can somebody explain the logic behind this...??
Bigger isn't always faster. Look at the new Lexus 3.5L 6 cylinder. It makes near 330hp where as the SC 430 4.3L 8 cylinder is still under 300hp.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 07:45 AM
  #23  
94lex83457's Avatar
94lex83457
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
From: OR
Default

Originally Posted by BiZ
Bigger isn't always faster. Look at the new Lexus 3.5L 6 cylinder. It makes near 330hp where as the SC 430 4.3L 8 cylinder is still under 300hp.
that's what bothers me. The engine has plenty of potential, but the car is the slowest Lexus next to the ES, and it's the bloody SPORTS COUPE

I just think that Lexus could make up for the lame styling, (IMHO), and start selling a few more of these things (to enthusiasts) if they beefed up the power plant. When you are paying around 70k for a new car, it better have some punch too it.

BUT, this will all be rectified by the LF-A (hopefully).

Last edited by 94lex83457; Nov 17, 2006 at 11:41 AM. Reason: joe needs to sleep before posting...
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 08:16 AM
  #24  
mkorsu's Avatar
mkorsu
Zombie Slayer
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,053
Likes: 3
From: East Bumble F, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by 94lex83457
that's what bothers me. The engine has plenty of potential, but the car is the slowest Lexus next to the ES, and it's the bloody SPORTS COUPE

Maybe i'm just looking at this from a marketing perspective, IDK. I just think that Lexus could make up for the lame styling, (IMHO), and start selling a few more of these things if they beefed up the power plant. When you are paying around 70k for a new car, it better have some punch too it.
The things some of you are missing here is known as "Demographic Segment". You are referencing what YOU would want. That may not be what the majority of perspective buyers want within the vehicle's demographic segment.

Market research dictates what buyers are really looking for from a Lexus, 2-door, luxury sports coupe, with a price point of $70k. Change one factor, ie: power and the other factors all change. Perhaps the cost goes up, or the luxury ride is compromised. These changes may not be what the market this car is designed for is looking for.

Browse through the SC430 forum and see how pleased those owners are with their cars.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 10:21 AM
  #25  
3000's Avatar
3000
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 1
From: CA
Default

I'd say the numbers keep getting higher and higher, with the exception of the iS250.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 10:41 AM
  #26  
G Star's Avatar
G Star
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,973
Likes: 48
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by 94lex83457
that's what bothers me. The engine has plenty of potential, but the car is the slowest Lexus next to the ES, and it's the bloody SPORTS COUPE

Maybe i'm just looking at this from a marketing perspective, IDK. I just think that Lexus could make up for the lame styling, (IMHO), and start selling a few more of these things if they beefed up the power plant. When you are paying around 70k for a new car, it better have some punch too it.
wow..just wow...

It's funny how you actually think you know more about the market than the professionals @ Toyota/Lexus, which sell record breaking amounts of cars by a monthly basis.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 11:39 AM
  #27  
94lex83457's Avatar
94lex83457
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
From: OR
Default

ok, my bad, when I wrote my response it was early and I haven't slept (I still haven't) and Toyota/Lexus keeps breaking their own records which shows they know how to not only make a car, but to market/advertise it correctly. Mkorsu got it right, SC430 owners (here on CL and from around my house) love their car, and I guess I would like a more "sporty" vehicle. I think the SC3/400 was an awesome GT car and had the perfect balance of sport and luxury (for it's day). With the 430 it looks fat, and appears to have had many of the sporting characterists cut.

I take it back it wasn't a marketing thing, it was a personal preference.

Last edited by 94lex83457; Nov 17, 2006 at 11:42 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 07:17 PM
  #28  
Lucky SC's Avatar
Lucky SC
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by O. L. T.
Hey... uh, could you not put 6mp pictures in the forum please
just helping out... only interior picture of it...
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2006 | 02:38 PM
  #29  
asadchinoy's Avatar
asadchinoy
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: georgia
Default

I think the next "manly" lexus will be the IS500 coupe. It will be a good replacement for the old SC400.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2006 | 12:30 AM
  #30  
SCrazy's Avatar
SCrazy
Rookie
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: ca
Default

i just went to the moscone car show that comes around every thanksgiving in san francisco, and saw the sc430, and it does look bigger than i thought it did in pictures. talked to the lexus representative, and "it is 4 seater, but unless you are dead skinny, you cant fit in the back with convenience and wont live up to what the old sc standards." so he says lol.... sorry to say new sc is in a way a chicks car. IMO
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:22 AM.