Notices
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)

Supra TT spring issue

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 10:23 PM
  #31  
97Soarer's Avatar
97Soarer
Pole Position
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 353
Likes: 2
From: CA
Default

tokico illumina
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 08:27 AM
  #32  
Quick VR-4's Avatar
Quick VR-4
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 974
Likes: 1
From: Tennessee
Default

I have an MKIV TT suspension that I was going to install this weekend. I was definitely going to install the front first and drive to let settle. If it has a nice rake from back to front, then I was going to keep the factory SC rears. Looks like I will not have to even test it because I definitely do not want the front sitting higher than rear. If you are looking for a quick fix until you figure out what you want to do, you can always get some spring braces from autozone for a few bucks. It is a ghetto fix, but may be worth it short term. Looks like a large screw that wedges in between the coils to give a little more height. Overall effect will probably be less than an inch. Good luck.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 08:29 AM
  #33  
VJ RC51's Avatar
VJ RC51
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,973
Likes: 0
From: Central FL
Default

i like the rake, im keeping it
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 10:39 AM
  #34  
jdmtruong's Avatar
jdmtruong
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

how are the intrax btw? on fleabay there r these tein h-tech...gold ones...those any good?
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 10:46 AM
  #35  
VJ RC51's Avatar
VJ RC51
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,973
Likes: 0
From: Central FL
Default

Originally Posted by jdmtruong
how are the intrax btw? on fleabay there r these tein h-tech...gold ones...those any good?
The intrax are stuff, i think some of the stiffest on the market. They are lowww tho and the car would need a camber kit, but i like the drift look. I got em used, and very happy with the quality. I had new eibachs on another car a few years ago, junk. The car drove and handled like a boat, i hate progressive springs.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 02:22 PM
  #36  
nasc300's Avatar
nasc300
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 431
Likes: 1
From: ****
Default

Originally Posted by VJ RC51
The intrax are stuff, i think some of the stiffest on the market. They are lowww tho and the car would need a camber kit, but i like the drift look. I got em used, and very happy with the quality. I had new eibachs on another car a few years ago, junk. The car drove and handled like a boat, i hate progressive springs.
Agreed. Progressive springs are a no no.
I had interx on my supra and now on my SC. Yes they are low, but ride decent and no cluking noises like the eibach progressive springs.
But you know how people think, as soon as you ask about intrax springs many will start bad talking them even if they have't even used them. Intrax in trash Cheap junk Get super expensive jdm stuff , blah blah blah
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 02:35 PM
  #37  
VJ RC51's Avatar
VJ RC51
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,973
Likes: 0
From: Central FL
Default

Originally Posted by nasc300
Cheap junk Get super expensive jdm stuff , blah blah blah
You have no idea how much i hear that with my SC because i do not order uber expensive jdm name brand parts. I got my metal upper rad hose for $10 at the local muffler shop, and cut the factory 2jzge upper hose to use for connectors. I powdercoated it chome and there u go... Ill probably get flamed for it cause its made from a mufflershop and not an uber expensive jdm company.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 03:08 PM
  #38  
stevechumo's Avatar
stevechumo
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 4
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by jdmtruong
i just put in supra tt stock suspension last week (shocks and springs) and they sit perfectly. the front looks like it does sit a SLIIIIIIIIIIGHTTT higher because the fender well is arched more than the back. try looking at it very hard, u will see it. i like the sus. tho. it is stiff, but would like to go a little lower.
If you really want the front and the rear to have the same height, here's a sacrificing tip: cut from 1/4 to 0.5 coil of the front. Cut 1/4 coil first, and if it's still high, then 0.5 coil for the total cut. You shouldn't go any lower. I've cut mine for 0.5" on the front and it just sits perfectly. I don't feel any more bouncier than before un-cut. I guess that the front is too heavy to have any bouncing. Also, half coil might still be in the handling of the Tokico shocks. I'm using Tanabe/Tokico components for the SC300 although my car is a SC400.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Eclipsor00
SC400 / 300 Classifieds
6
Jun 12, 2009 10:14 AM
dejacky
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
1
Jan 21, 2008 06:09 PM
recoil
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
1
Apr 10, 2007 09:03 AM
tpham7
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
20
Jun 16, 2004 05:19 PM
TypeSC300
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
14
Jul 20, 2001 12:48 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:01 PM.