Are all Supra LCAs the same?
Jul 31, 2005 | 02:44 AM
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,045
Likes: 1
From: CA
Are all Supra LCAs the same?
I noticed that the Supra LCAs off the newer 97-98 is much more expensive than the earlier models. What are the differences?
Jul 31, 2005 | 06:35 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: CT
i believe the 97-98 is aluminum versus steel
Dan
Jul 31, 2005 | 08:44 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Quote:
Originally Posted by YZFR1
i believe the 97-98 is aluminum versus steel
Dan
Ding ding ding....tell him what he's won.....
Yeah, the 97+ are aluminium. Cool, but WAY more exspensive. If your looking for arma to go on your SC go with whatever year car you have. (Exception: for 1992 SC's go with a 93.5 Supra Arm)
Jul 31, 2005 | 10:50 AM
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,045
Likes: 1
From: CA
Yea. so does reducing the unsprung weight with the aluminum arms really worth the extra cost?
Jul 31, 2005 | 11:00 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
My $.02...... nope. Stick with steel.
Jul 31, 2005 | 12:28 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Quote:
Originally Posted by xknowonex
Yea. so does reducing the unsprung weight with the aluminum arms really worth the extra cost?
If you race or autox, maybe. But just for daily driving the money would be better spent other ways.. unless you just like bragging rights.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
scshinobi
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
599
Aug 7, 2011 07:49 AM
bio3m
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
1
Feb 7, 2008 12:53 PM
97-SC300
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
3
Apr 20, 2007 11:30 AM
BMwhat?
Car Chat
12
Oct 30, 2006 05:58 PM
SC4Million
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
1
Dec 28, 2004 01:53 PM