Lower octane gas in SCs.
It was in the paper last week that crude has gone down $2 a barrel. Prices should reflect that soon, but definately not before memorial day weekend. That would just be rediculous.
My understanding of how our cars adapt/function on lower octane gas is such that the ECU retards the timing to avoid pinging. This results in lower HP and torque. I'm not sure how this affects mileage. It's also my understanding that the higher octane gas burns more cleanly.
If you insist on using lower octane, ween her down slowly. Give the ECU time to compensate. Do a half fill with 89 (the other half being 93), then a full tank of 89, fill her half with 89 and ther other with 87, then try a whole tank of 87. If you don't notice any adverse effects, then you should be fine. Just remember, that HP rating that comes from the factory is based on high octane.
Another *trick you could try... Reset the ECU. If you drive with a lead foot, your ecu has learned this and compensates with an agressive fuel mapping. Take the negative battery cable off for 15 mins or so. Then put it back on, and drive like grandma
I usually do the opposite, but that's becuase I want an aggressive mapping for the best performance. I reset the ECU then hit the highway under full acceleration and high speed for a few passes...
As to the effectiveness of either of these "tricks", I'm uncertain. If you search the fourms you will find others that have also said much the same thing you're reading here.
If you're wondering, I still run 93 (I even try to avoid 92), but I have been debating the idea of going cheap.
My understanding of how our cars adapt/function on lower octane gas is such that the ECU retards the timing to avoid pinging. This results in lower HP and torque. I'm not sure how this affects mileage. It's also my understanding that the higher octane gas burns more cleanly.
If you insist on using lower octane, ween her down slowly. Give the ECU time to compensate. Do a half fill with 89 (the other half being 93), then a full tank of 89, fill her half with 89 and ther other with 87, then try a whole tank of 87. If you don't notice any adverse effects, then you should be fine. Just remember, that HP rating that comes from the factory is based on high octane.
Another *trick you could try... Reset the ECU. If you drive with a lead foot, your ecu has learned this and compensates with an agressive fuel mapping. Take the negative battery cable off for 15 mins or so. Then put it back on, and drive like grandma
I usually do the opposite, but that's becuase I want an aggressive mapping for the best performance. I reset the ECU then hit the highway under full acceleration and high speed for a few passes...As to the effectiveness of either of these "tricks", I'm uncertain. If you search the fourms you will find others that have also said much the same thing you're reading here.
If you're wondering, I still run 93 (I even try to avoid 92), but I have been debating the idea of going cheap.
Originally Posted by audi2nr
someone with a portable scanner should run lower octane gas and plug in the scanner and watch the engine timing while driving(have an assistant watch) , and look for a diffrence, if i had one i would try it to see how much the ecu would retard the timing and such....
If you run 89 and don't have pinging, you're probably OK. I run 89 in my sc400 but when I do, I don't drive it aggressively. No WOT runs.
You could retard timing by 4 degrees or so and run lower octane safely at the cost of some peak power, but you're gas mileage shouldn't suffer. Best thing would be to have your ECU reprogrammed for 87 fuel maps.
Originally Posted by CompuMan
My mechanic has told me that these cars have a computer that modifies the timing a small amount to adjust for the differences in octane. I always fill up when my tank when it reaches half empty/full.
So, he has advised me to fill up with the 91 octane every other fill up, 93 octane the other times. (remember, I always fill up at half empty). This saves a little money and, so far, has had no ill effects.
So, he has advised me to fill up with the 91 octane every other fill up, 93 octane the other times. (remember, I always fill up at half empty). This saves a little money and, so far, has had no ill effects.
Last edited by sorka; Apr 12, 2005 at 07:28 PM.
Originally Posted by CantSeeMe
Im far from an expert, but i have had my 93 sc300 for 4 years now. And tried using the 87 octain after i had it 3 months probably, and it was pinging like the pga tour,
and it wasnt my imagination. and it also doesnt like even premium gas from rotten robbie type stations -i made that mistake 2-3 times too.. the sc400 may not have probs.... If you can get away with it, i say go for it- But i wouldnt recommend it. And remember.... youve been warned!
and it wasnt my imagination. and it also doesnt like even premium gas from rotten robbie type stations -i made that mistake 2-3 times too.. the sc400 may not have probs.... If you can get away with it, i say go for it- But i wouldnt recommend it. And remember.... youve been warned!
Originally Posted by Jimbo2828
every brand??? even the mom and pop gases???
i've been running 87octane ever since premium reached $1.50/gal
car = 92SC400 106k miles
no pinging, no knocking. My last dyno session I ran with 87oct and ran 214rwhp. I figure no point in going to dyno with super gas when I'm not going to fill her up with anything better anyways.
car = 92SC400 106k miles
no pinging, no knocking. My last dyno session I ran with 87oct and ran 214rwhp. I figure no point in going to dyno with super gas when I'm not going to fill her up with anything better anyways.
Originally Posted by sorka
You're mechanic is an idiot. It's true most cars will retard the timing if you put lower octane gas than required......but only AFTER the ECU has detected detonation which means damage could already be occuring. Yes that's right, the only way the ECU can retard the timing for lower octane is IF IT DETECTS DETONATION. Even worse, detonation cannot be picked up by the sensor under most of the RPM range.
Yes, but most pinging, even damaging detonation, cannot be picked up by the sensors in much of the RPM range. Knock sensors are there as a safety net in case you get bad gas or accidently put gas in that has a lower octane than your engine needs. Again, the only way the ECU retards timing due to lower octane gas is IF detonation is detected and if it is, the ECU will retard the timing to eliminate it. However, damage could already be occuring.
Some here report they can put 87 in their SC400s and others say they ping on anything less than 91. Each car will be different. The base timing is the biggest factors. Not all cars will be the same. Other factors are carbon deposits in the combustion chambers, temperature, humidity, etc.
Some here report they can put 87 in their SC400s and others say they ping on anything less than 91. Each car will be different. The base timing is the biggest factors. Not all cars will be the same. Other factors are carbon deposits in the combustion chambers, temperature, humidity, etc.






