Notices
RX - 4th Gen (2016-2022) Discussion topics related to the 2016 and up RX350 and RX450h models

2015 Rx450h versus 2016 450h

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 11, 2016 | 07:11 AM
  #1  
cooladude's Avatar
cooladude
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default 2015 Rx450h versus 2016 450h

Please excuse me if it's the wrong forum, but the hybrid forum only mentions till 2015.

Need to get a new car and am between the RX -- can get the 2016 with the pre-collision , adaptive radar for 54000 (not bad I feel).

Another dealer has the closeout 2015 for $48500 but no pre-collision or adaptive radar. Both have blind spot.

Which one is the better bet?

I'm a bit concerned that the New RX is "Bigger" -- that is harder to maneuver and park (length 189 versus 192). But, really, not sure if the drive and experience changed too much. Test drives are so short.

Thank you for any help and support.

They both accept regular gas right?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2016 | 08:53 AM
  #2  
kitlz's Avatar
kitlz
No, I don't play soccer!
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 177
From: NJ
Default

First, both the '15 and '16 RX450h take premium. The '12+ RX350 accepts regular.

Besides the obvious design differences inside and out, the '16 got a slight bump in HP. It also offers more features and options. The size difference is negligible IMO. The best thing to do is come up with a list of things that are important to you. If that includes pre-collision and adaptive cruise control, it's all speed on the '16 now. And ask the dealer for an extended test drive. The best vehicle is the one you're most happy with. Good luck.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2016 | 10:27 AM
  #3  
litzdog911's Avatar
litzdog911
Pole Position
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 373
Likes: 5
From: WA
Default

Probably the biggest difference is the body styling.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2016 | 10:29 AM
  #4  
bootman's Avatar
bootman
Advanced
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 506
Likes: 42
From: PA
Default

How long will you keep it?
If under 7 years or so I'd take the non hybrid since the gas savings won't pay off until then anyway.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2016 | 02:24 PM
  #5  
iginoc's Avatar
iginoc
Rookie
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 76
Likes: 5
From: Italy
Default

Safety-wise, I'd go for the 2016 model, IMO pre collision and adaptive radar worth well the difference.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2016 | 05:04 PM
  #6  
unowned's Avatar
unowned
Pole Position
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 263
Likes: 3
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by cooladude

Which one is the better bet?

I'm a bit concerned that the New RX is "Bigger" -- that is harder to maneuver and park (length 189 versus 192). But, really, not sure if the drive and experience changed too much.
Newer is better if you are willing to risk new gen 1st year issues. It will be safer, it's much quieter, it's easier to park especially with the panoramic monitor.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2016 | 10:29 AM
  #7  
Macs4RX's Avatar
Macs4RX
Driver
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 119
Likes: 3
From: MA
Default

Originally Posted by unowned
Newer is better if you are willing to risk new gen 1st year issues. It will be safer, it's much quieter, it's easier to park especially with the panoramic monitor.
I would very much like to buy my RX with the Panoramic Monitor option but it seems so few cars come with it. I'm glad to hear that it helps with parking as my biggest concern after 1st year reliability is side/rearward looking visibility. A back-up camera is great but only helps to a certain extent. (I'm not interested in ordering a car - I'd prefer to buy something on the dealer's lot.) Why aren't they manufacturing more RX's with this great new feature (panoramic monitor)?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jugdish
Hybrid Technology
9
Feb 21, 2019 11:49 AM
Curtis2000
RX - 4th Gen (2016-2022)
5
May 3, 2017 06:19 AM
ultra63
RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009)
7
Apr 7, 2005 06:11 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:05 AM.