Notices
RX - 1st Gen (1999-2003) Discussion topics related to the 1999 -2003 RX300 models

LEV v. ULEV

Old Apr 10, 2003 | 08:44 AM
  #1  
Oivey2000's Avatar
Oivey2000
Thread Starter
Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 58
Likes: 5
From: Maryland
Default LEV v. ULEV

ANYONE KNOW WHY THE RX300 IS CLASSIFIED AS A LOW EMISSIONS VEHICLE (I.E. "LEV") AND THE RX330 AN ULTRA-LOW EMISSIONS VEHICLE (I.E. "ULEV")? OBVIOUSLY SOMETHING WAS IMPROVED ON THE 330.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2003 | 07:46 PM
  #2  
scalbert's Avatar
scalbert
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: GA
Default

The LEV or ULEV are emission status indicators. Why one meets it and the other does not would be a matter of the design of the engine, the catalyst make up or even simply the ECU program. There are many things that could make the difference.

IMO, I would like to see the actual output number as i suspect there would be minimal difference unless the catalyst was changed significantly.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 05:27 AM
  #3  
ktubes's Avatar
ktubes
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: New York
Cool ULEV vs. LEV

For 2004, the California Emissions Stds requires that all light-duty truck and medium-duty vehicles below 8500 lbs gross weight will have to meet passenger car requirements. This requires reduction of Hydrocarbon and Carbon Monoxide emmisions by roughly half while NOx stay the same as the pre 2004 standard.

The 2004 ULEV standards for pass cars is:

NOx 0.07 g/mile
CO 2.1 g/mile
NMOG 0.055 g/mile

Last edited by ktubes; Apr 20, 2003 at 05:44 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jim256
RX - 4th Gen (2016-2022)
0
Apr 26, 2019 06:23 AM
NYCGeordie
RX - 1st Gen (1999-2003)
1
Sep 24, 2018 11:39 AM
Gojirra99
Car Chat
21
Apr 23, 2005 09:24 PM
Sam Khoury
RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009)
2
Feb 10, 2003 01:28 PM
blackaje
RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009)
2
Aug 24, 2002 08:59 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:27 PM.