Notices
RX - 1st Gen (1999-2003) Discussion topics related to the 1999 -2003 RX300 models

Load Capacity??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2001 | 06:08 AM
  #1  
Goncookoo's Avatar
Goncookoo
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Default Load Capacity??

Hello all,

I was rummaging through an issue of consumer reports at the bookstore and found a comparison on a lot of vehicles. So I read the reviews on the RX (obviously they were excellent).

Well I stumbled across this one rating that puzzled me.

To my recollection it was called: Load Capacity

The RX's Load Capacity was rated at between 800 and 900 Lbs(I cant seem to remember the exact number). I thought it was the towing capacity but then saw that the towing capacity rating was also listed, so I knew it wasnt that. I looked around for what Load Capacity meant but couldnt find a definition. Im assuming that it means how much weight the car can be loaded with (is that right?). To compare, I looked at other cars and saw that they too had it and the RX's rating was almost equal to the ES300, Camry, etc.. !!!!! WHAT? So i looked at some SUV's and found that all other SUV's had higher Load Capacity ratings (400 lbs more at least)!

So what does this mean? If its truley "how much the car can be loaded with," are you saying its the same as a sedan? I know the RX was built to be less of an SUV, but boy that means i cant load it with more than what I can squeeze into a sedan? I have plenty of friends that weigh 300lb+ and ive carried them in my car plenty of times. On occasion i know ive packed more than 900lbs of stuff into my car (mainly people and their luggage).

So, is stuctural damage imminent if i carry my heavy frineds? Man, I thought the RX could at least carry more than a sedan.

goncookoo
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2001 | 08:31 AM
  #2  
LexRX's Avatar
LexRX
RX 300 & 350Z Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,256
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Default

You're right about the load capacity, it's how much weight you can carry inside the vehicle. Consumer Reports did a report on this a little while back and the RX along with some other SUVs have very low load capacities.

I guess if your passengers are over the load capacity, you can hook up a trailer and tow them behind you

-Nick
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2001 | 01:07 PM
  #3  
MrSypher's Avatar
MrSypher
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,145
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Default

The Rx is A raised 5 door Camry.... But A Lexus SUV...
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2001 | 10:39 PM
  #4  
vicpai's Avatar
vicpai
Pole Position
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: California
Default Re: Load Capacity??

Originally posted by Goncookoo
Hello all,

I was rummaging through an issue of consumer reports at the bookstore and found a comparison on a lot of vehicles. So I read the reviews on the RX (obviously they were excellent).

Well I stumbled across this one rating that puzzled me.

To my recollection it was called: Load Capacity

The RX's Load Capacity was rated at between 800 and 900 Lbs(I cant seem to remember the exact number). I thought it was the towing capacity but then saw that the towing capacity rating was also listed, so I knew it wasnt that. I looked around for what Load Capacity meant but couldnt find a definition. Im assuming that it means how much weight the car can be loaded with (is that right?). To compare, I looked at other cars and saw that they too had it and the RX's rating was almost equal to the ES300, Camry, etc.. !!!!! WHAT? So i looked at some SUV's and found that all other SUV's had higher Load Capacity ratings (400 lbs more at least)!

So what does this mean? If its truley "how much the car can be loaded with," are you saying its the same as a sedan? I know the RX was built to be less of an SUV, but boy that means i cant load it with more than what I can squeeze into a sedan? I have plenty of friends that weigh 300lb+ and ive carried them in my car plenty of times. On occasion i know ive packed more than 900lbs of stuff into my car (mainly people and their luggage).

So, is stuctural damage imminent if i carry my heavy frineds? Man, I thought the RX could at least carry more than a sedan.

goncookoo
The RX is a tall "wagon" and I don't mean this in a derogatory way, but it's nonetheless a Lexus in every way - reliable, comfortable and luxurious with just a touch of ruggedness. For the most part the RX 300 serves it's mission very well. It's not for those who want a huge behemoth of an SUV (i.e. the "bigger-is-better-crowd"). It's a relatively compact, luxurious, personal transportation for those that want to venture a little beyond the civilized world (that is people like me, who are single, WITHOUT large families or 10 tons of cargo to haul) - Currently very very few models serve this market!!!....so Thank God for the combination of the COMPACT and SOMEWHAT RUGGED, LUXURIOUS RX!!!......However, if I were to desire anything more in the RX, it would be SLIGHTLY better off-road capability - maybe an inch or so more ground clearance and some sort of protection underneath (at least on 4WD models)

Last edited by vicpai; Dec 21, 2001 at 10:51 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2001 | 12:07 PM
  #5  
white01's Avatar
white01
Driver
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

I read the same thing. I have noticed that these vehicles are sensitive to weight. It's more a handling/safety concern than a structural integrity issue.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
patineto
RX - 4th Gen (2016-2022)
18
Apr 29, 2020 12:03 PM
Hoosiers
RX - 3rd Gen (2010-2015)
41
May 31, 2014 11:33 AM
draco
RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009)
11
Nov 3, 2009 08:45 AM
barry_s
RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009)
15
Jun 3, 2006 10:12 AM
Lex Diamonds
ES - 1st to 6th Gen (1990-2018)
5
Oct 3, 2002 11:52 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:51 AM.