Notices
Performance Forced induction, intakes, exhausts, torque converters, transmissions, etc.

Ovtune ECU tuning experience/review

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 4, 2017 | 11:14 AM
  #241  
MDHLexus's Avatar
MDHLexus
Pole Position
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 287
Likes: 2
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by DickH
Have you checked out under the valve covers?
I have not, the car is only at 103K miles, I just can't accept that there would be Valve wear on a car with this low mileage. 203k miles would be a different story.

I was out of the country for a week, and left the car at my shop and had my mechanics muck around with it and see what they could see, but the problem stopped. We ran Toyota Diagnostics and everything was fine, the software picked up something it didn't like, but I'm just assuming that was the tune. I tried to drive the car to recreate the problem for them to hear and it just would not do it. The car would get choppy and hesitant for like half a second, but then go back to normal. There is however still an interesting hollow sound coming from bank 2. It is so faint it could be anything really, I'm still leaning towards it being related to the valves and that that is what is causing the engine to stutter, but i'm not positive. I tried to record the sound but you can't hear this one on recordings.

I was running 5w30 synthetic BLEND. I am now running 5w30 FULL Synthetic oil, so we'll see if that slips along better. I'm wondering if the standard oil was too viscous and the hydraulic lifter got drained when moving at 7,200 RPM.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2017 | 11:16 AM
  #242  
MDHLexus's Avatar
MDHLexus
Pole Position
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 287
Likes: 2
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by TsunamiF
Any new updates on why your engine took a nose dive? Do you still think it has to due with a damaged ECU (or connectors) or do you think the higher 7,400 RPM contributed to the engine problems you're experiencing?
Correction on my end -- TUNED TO 7200 -- so I highly doubt it was from mechanical engine components moving too fast.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2017 | 02:14 PM
  #243  
Gville350's Avatar
Gville350
Moderator
10 Year Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 11,576
Likes: 444
From: South Carolina
Default

Does your shop have access to a bore scope to look over the piston tops and valves?
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2017 | 04:20 PM
  #244  
MDHLexus's Avatar
MDHLexus
Pole Position
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 287
Likes: 2
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Gville350
Does your shop have access to a bore scope to look over the piston tops and valves?
I'll check on that. The car started running fine again, then got it back to my house and it started acting up again. Misfire code however is now on Cylinder 3! So we have both Bank 1 and Bank 2 symptoms.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2017 | 11:35 AM
  #245  
Rezno's Avatar
Rezno
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 465
Likes: 25
From: OR
Default

Originally Posted by Tro209
The crazy thing is that I didn't even launch the car, it was just me staying in 1st gear manually and stepping on it at 10mph. I still had traction control and all that on too AND I had a passenger (and once again, we ain't light either LOL) I'm fairly confident that the 0-100 time with a proper launch, zero wheelspin, traction off, perfect timed shifts, and no passenger is at the very least a full second faster. But that's just my guess from what I see and feel from driving the car. What's really great is that OV's transmission tune is coming next month which will allow us to Rev to 7400 in "D" auto so that shifting will never be an excuse. And as you know, the IS350 is always faster in auto vs manual so this along with improved shifting should definitely help.

As for stability, I've only ever driven the car ONCE without traction and that was yesterday when I was practicing launching the car (in preparation for my eventual 1/4 mile run next month) and if you read my post a few posts above, I managed to launch the car yesterday morning at around 1200 rpm with perfect timed shifts and OMG the car felt quick lol. Not saying it's ISF status or anything because it obviously isn't, but for a V6 it's Damn quick.
I missed the 'launched at 1200 rpm' post. Usually what I hear for an optimal launch is between 2000 and 2500, which could potentially decrease the times even more. This could make a 0-60 time of 4.5 seconds or less. So much excitement. I guess I bought my 350 at about the right time lol.

Everything you're saying though leads me to believe that transmission tune is going to have a much bigger impact on the feel and acceleration of the car to the point where I almost cannot wait. This is really great to hear. Let us know how that 1/4 mile launch next month goes. Lets pray for 12s.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2017 | 11:38 AM
  #246  
Rezno's Avatar
Rezno
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 465
Likes: 25
From: OR
Default

Originally Posted by Dimitrij30
Hopefully it will make the car sound even meaner, 3-5 whp is realistic from this carbon induction intake with larger MAF. Anyone thinks it can deliver 8-12whp?
I'm hoping it does deliver anything above 10whp (overly enthusiastic me is hoping for 15whp) otherwise it is just much cheaper to get the F-Sport intake and live with the 5whp and the added sound. $600+ for an intake must have some additional benefit to it otherwise it really isn't worth it. Even if it does make 8whp I think I'd save my money and get the F-Sport intake.

Side note: With all the tuning and modifications to the drivetrain, is it possible that PPE headers will add more than the 16whp as advertised?
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2017 | 12:05 PM
  #247  
Tro209's Avatar
Tro209
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,636
Likes: 9
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Rezno
I missed the 'launched at 1200 rpm' post. Usually what I hear for an optimal launch is between 2000 and 2500, which could potentially decrease the times even more. This could make a 0-60 time of 4.5 seconds or less. So much excitement. I guess I bought my 350 at about the right time lol.

Everything you're saying though leads me to believe that transmission tune is going to have a much bigger impact on the feel and acceleration of the car to the point where I almost cannot wait. This is really great to hear. Let us know how that 1/4 mile launch next month goes. Lets pray for 12s.
Yeah but problem with my car is I can't launch above that. I get wheel spin which is bad for 0-60. Even people with better tire setups than me can't manage to do much better...

​​​​​Oh and also some good news for you guys! Im getting dyno'd today and should have results up later on today
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2017 | 05:57 PM
  #248  
bbaugher47's Avatar
bbaugher47
Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 224
From: RVA
Default

I think that 600$ includes a stage 2 tune? I know the pricing doesnt make sense but Who knows.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2017 | 09:18 PM
  #249  
Rezno's Avatar
Rezno
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 465
Likes: 25
From: OR
Default

Originally Posted by bbaugher47
I think that 600$ includes a stage 2 tune? I know the pricing doesnt make sense but Who knows.
I'd hope so. Unless that intake makes more than 10hp it isn't worth it. If it comes with a tune though that is a steal.

Originally Posted by Tro209
Yeah but problem with my car is I can't launch above that. I get wheel spin which is bad for 0-60. Even people with better tire setups than me can't manage to do much better...

​​​​​Oh and also some good news for you guys! Im getting dyno'd today and should have results up later on today
I see. Hopefully if you launch it on a prepped 1/4 mile track you can launch at a higher RPM. Hoping for 290+ on the dyno!
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2017 | 08:43 AM
  #250  
DickH's Avatar
DickH
Thread Starter
Intermediate
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 444
Likes: 69
Default

If you visit their site the $600 intake is the cold air version that is likely longer. I have made my own intake that is similar to what is pictured on their website and there was a 2-3% difference in the maf reading vs the oem setup. This translates to ~5-8hp of more air while within the stock rev limit. I would not be surprised if the intake was be worth ~10hp by 7400rpm with an adequate exhaust setup. I don't think it is necessary to have a cold air intake on our cars, I made a heat shield that accepts the oem inlet from the front of the car and the intake temperatures didn't vary much from ambient temps unless I sat at a light or something for a while. If I am not too busy on the next warmer day I might do a back to back comparison with the oem intake vs what I have (which looks similar to what OVT wants to sell) to see how big the difference is in the higher RPMs.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2017 | 08:53 AM
  #251  
Tro209's Avatar
Tro209
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,636
Likes: 9
From: California
Default

Sorry guys no luck on the dyno. Tuner lagged on me
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2017 | 07:04 PM
  #252  
metaleckz's Avatar
metaleckz
Racer
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,834
Likes: 32
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Tro209
Sorry guys no luck on the dyno. Tuner lagged on me
man, i wanted to know the result!
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2017 | 11:00 AM
  #253  
buister's Avatar
buister
Pit Crew
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 194
Likes: 56
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by DickH
If you visit their site the $600 intake is the cold air version that is likely longer. I have made my own intake that is similar to what is pictured on their website and there was a 2-3% difference in the maf reading vs the oem setup. This translates to ~5-8hp of more air while within the stock rev limit. I would not be surprised if the intake was be worth ~10hp by 7400rpm with an adequate exhaust setup. I don't think it is necessary to have a cold air intake on our cars, I made a heat shield that accepts the oem inlet from the front of the car and the intake temperatures didn't vary much from ambient temps unless I sat at a light or something for a while. If I am not too busy on the next warmer day I might do a back to back comparison with the oem intake vs what I have (which looks similar to what OVT wants to sell) to see how big the difference is in the higher RPMs.
I saw the thread on your home-made CAI. Very impressive work! The OVTuned CAI looks to me like it has a larger tube though, so that's why it needs their special tune for the a/f correction. Combining the cooler air, larger tube and a tune, I think it can make 10hp or more gain but have to see some dyno results before I would buy one. It's also interesting to see the difference in power gain among the 3 versions that they have.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2017 | 11:09 AM
  #254  
DickH's Avatar
DickH
Thread Starter
Intermediate
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 444
Likes: 69
Default

They are using a larger maf housing which will require a tune as the maf reading will be off. I am pretty sure the larger tubing wont matter though as when I was playing around it appeared that the oem air box was the restriction before the zip tube. I don't think the car needs the bigger tube, it just won't hurt anything.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2017 | 04:05 PM
  #255  
Rezno's Avatar
Rezno
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 465
Likes: 25
From: OR
Default

Originally Posted by Kmasyl
I am told dyno results with OV's new carbon induction intake with larger MAF will be released Friday!
Has it been released yet? I checked their Facebook page but didn't find much...
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:05 AM.