When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Neo does not have knock sensor input, but all the other connections should be fine. The only difference is the RPM and TPS locations.
Oops i've never seen the NEO instructions. I thought that it had all the S-AFCII features and more. You say the RPM and TPS locations are different do you mean the harness you had made is different than the diagram you posted??
Last edited by GILLEXUS; Jan 20, 2008 at 01:48 AM.
Let's just pretend if these were reversed and I didn't catch it...can my engine go "kaboom?"
No beacause it only input.
Originally Posted by GILLEXUS
Oops i've never seen the NEO instructions. I thought that it had all the S-AFC features and more. You say the RPM and TPS locations are different do you mean the harness you had made is different than the diagram you posted??
If you compare the diagram on the Safc and Neo, the only pin connections that are different are RPM and TPS.
If you compare the diagram on the Safc and Neo, the only pin connections that are different are RPM and TPS.
(Pic) red dots are for NEO's pin location.
My advise, I would go with the diagram that I posted from GURU I know that it acually works and the 10e diagram is tha same as GURU's that does work on the 98-00 GS400. To validate this fact go to SRT's ECU's diagram for the 98-00 GS400. SRT 's diagram has been working for dozens of guys.
You will notice that the RPM location is the only thing that is different w/ SRT's compared to Apex's 10e and GURU's diagram. What I found out researching the GS430 ECU for my S-AFC II install was that Both RPM's are correct.
SRT's RPM wire goes to the car's ECU ignition #1 output and the S-AFC's RPM wire goes to the car's tach signal.
