When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
i guess i'm one of the few who would like to find a supercharger kit for the gs300. simple just a few things to bolt on and i'm not wanting a ton more power just a little bit
This poll is useless without specifying the car, power goals, and type of usage.
Also, there are hybrid designs, such as the Rotrex supercharger, that is like a turbo on the compressor side.
Finally, someone that understand the application diffrerences over just throwing things they heard or myths around.
Still have yet to see a turbo dragsster break 6s. Long ways to go before top fuel gives up there supercharged set ups
Originally Posted by GSFREAK74
where or who carries a sc kit for the gs300?
Originally Posted by Silver GS
Who carries a turbo kit for the GS300?
Originally Posted by jriggs
i guess i'm one of the few who would like to find a supercharger kit for the gs300. simple just a few things to bolt on and i'm not wanting a ton more power just a little bit
you guys really need to use the search option.
Last edited by GS FONZy; Jun 17, 2008 at 07:24 PM.
I prefer turbos but they do use power to make boost. They are a restriction though. You need a pressure drop across the turbine wheel. Anything considered streetable will be higher than 1.1 on the turbine side. Even with no back pressure after the turbo you will see 1 psi backpressure before the turbo for 1 psi compressor outlet pressure. I've run some larger turbo with alot of lag and have yet to get below 1.1. The turbo I run now would be considered laggy and is is almost 1.5:1. I don't know what the extra back pressure uses in terms of power but it does cost power to run a turbo.
Turbo's definitely have the potential to put more stress on a motor.
Assume both motors are in same condition, used in the same way and both hit max boost of 6psi. Since superchargers are driven by the crank, boost is dependent on crank speed. This means that you'll have to be at the top of your rev range to produce max boost. Depending on turbo size, tuning, etc, max boost from am turbocharged setup can be achieved at a much lower rpm. So you would be able to experience your max boost of 6psi for a lot longer in a turbo setup than a supercharger setup and therefore inducing more stress on your motor.
The ability of this extra stress is why i <3 turbo.
Turbo's definitely have the potential to put more stress on a motor.
Assume both motors are in same condition, used in the same way and both hit max boost of 6psi. Since superchargers are driven by the crank, boost is dependent on crank speed. This means that you'll have to be at the top of your rev range to produce max boost. Depending on turbo size, tuning, etc, max boost from am turbocharged setup can be achieved at a much lower rpm. So you would be able to experience your max boost of 6psi for a lot longer in a turbo setup than a supercharger setup and therefore inducing more stress on your motor.
The ability of this extra stress is why i <3 turbo.
Turbo's definitely have the potential to put more stress on a motor.
Assume both motors are in same condition, used in the same way and both hit max boost of 6psi. Since superchargers are driven by the crank, boost is dependent on crank speed. This means that you'll have to be at the top of your rev range to produce max boost. Depending on turbo size, tuning, etc, max boost from am turbocharged setup can be achieved at a much lower rpm. So you would be able to experience your max boost of 6psi for a lot longer in a turbo setup than a supercharger setup and therefore inducing more stress on your motor.
The ability of this extra stress is why i <3 turbo.
yea definitely not true (speaking from first hand experience)