Notices
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)

is a safc a good idea??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 29, 2011 | 09:11 AM
  #16  
V8KLLA's Avatar
V8KLLA
Driver
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Not a Lexus, but I run a Lex AFM/550cc/S-AFC combo on my MK3 Supra. The car makes a little over 400 to the wheels and is just street tuned (by me). Under full boost, ~20psi, the car is running AFRs in the high 11-low 12 range. Ive been running this combo for a couple years now with no engine damage to report.

I think you'll be fine as long as you dont push it. Tune it a little rich and you'll be ok.
Reply
Old May 29, 2011 | 02:33 PM
  #17  
lookEVO's Avatar
lookEVO
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 988
Likes: 1
From: CO
Default

Originally Posted by Abelo
okay well i just bought the safc2. i talked to one of the guys at rcts (they specialize in supras and bmw's lambos, and lots of jdm and tuning) and he said the safc will throw off timing and destroy you're motor,

but so many people run safc's i dont see why it could be that bad.

and anyone have any idea how to install it i dont have the wiring diagram,
Well they are ****in idiots because it doesnt have anything to do with timing. All it does it trick your ECU into adding (or subtracting) fuel
Reply
Old May 29, 2011 | 08:01 PM
  #18  
FutureSC's Avatar
FutureSC
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 433
Likes: 1
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by lookEVO
Well they are ****in idiots because it doesnt have anything to do with timing. All it does it trick your ECU into adding (or subtracting) fuel
You're wrong. Yes the AFC does trick the ecu into adding or subtracting fuel but a side effect is timing change.

When you pull fuel, the ecu automatically advances timing, and vise-versa.
Reply
Old May 29, 2011 | 08:35 PM
  #19  
meangreen1's Avatar
meangreen1
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 943
Likes: 1
From: or
Default

Its what I am running. Not bad for now, but I plan on getting an AEM
Reply
Old May 30, 2011 | 11:52 AM
  #20  
lookEVO's Avatar
lookEVO
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 988
Likes: 1
From: CO
Default

Originally Posted by FutureSC
You're wrong. Yes the AFC does trick the ecu into adding or subtracting fuel but a side effect is timing change.

When you pull fuel, the ecu automatically advances timing, and vise-versa.

yeah, WAY indirectly, Its not gonna add 70 degrees of advance or retard... youre talking about simple timing changes that the ECU does CONSTANTLY. Its not like you are gonna pull or add so much timing that youll break anything... NOT TO MENTION the 2jz isnt an interference engine. The way he makes it sound is that it adjusts timing. Anything your ECU does, even if tricked, is still safe for the car. If your car is capable of adding or subtracting the fuel, than the timing associated with it is fine as well. you should be fine. Itd be way easier to screw something up if you are on standalone, as you can change a lot more. Ive never personally heard of anyone blowing their engine because of an safc2 messing up their timing, ive built and boosted many cars with that setup... personal cars as well as customer cars. Thats just preposterous.
Reply
Old May 30, 2011 | 01:26 PM
  #21  
FutureSC's Avatar
FutureSC
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 433
Likes: 1
From: VA
Default

Oh of course it's not going to go as far as changing timing a ridiculous amount. I run an AFC in my car and no doubt it's okay. Timing change is definitely not a big side effect but I was just saying that that side effect is there, even if it's just a little one.

The only thing I would worry about is maxing out the AFC with plus or minus 50. Other than that you should never have any problems with it.
Reply
Old May 30, 2011 | 02:07 PM
  #22  
lookEVO's Avatar
lookEVO
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 988
Likes: 1
From: CO
Default

Thats what I thought you meant, just making sure.
Reply
Old May 30, 2011 | 02:52 PM
  #23  
mitsuguy's Avatar
mitsuguy
Maintenance Moderator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,388
Likes: 27
From: AZ
Default

Originally Posted by lookEVO
yeah, WAY indirectly, Its not gonna add 70 degrees of advance or retard... youre talking about simple timing changes that the ECU does CONSTANTLY. Its not like you are gonna pull or add so much timing that youll break anything... NOT TO MENTION the 2jz isnt an interference engine. The way he makes it sound is that it adjusts timing. Anything your ECU does, even if tricked, is still safe for the car. If your car is capable of adding or subtracting the fuel, than the timing associated with it is fine as well. you should be fine. Itd be way easier to screw something up if you are on standalone, as you can change a lot more. Ive never personally heard of anyone blowing their engine because of an safc2 messing up their timing, ive built and boosted many cars with that setup... personal cars as well as customer cars. Thats just preposterous.
So long as you stay with reasonable sized injectors and keep your AFC adjustments on the low side of things, the timing advance isn't a huge huge deal, however, it is still there... What most people end up doing and not even realizing they are doing it is compensating for the additional timing by adding even more fuel to prevent detonation...

Its not that it can't be done, its just a detriment to the AFC... if you go with a piggy back or standalone that can adjust timing independently, the engine will be a lot happier and healthier...

For those that don't understand the correlation, I'll give you a quick rundown...

When you install larger injectors, an AFC fools the computer in to thinking that there is less air going into the engine, so that it opens those injectors for a shorter period of time... Larger injectors, shorter open time... The reality of it is that you are going for more air for more power, but you don't want to go over the stock map or the stock injectors capabilities... The AFC and larger injectors combined allows this quite well... The side effect is that the ECU sees that not as much air is going in to the engine, because the amount of air going in to the engine (should be) proportionate to the load on the engine, the ecu advances timing thinking it has less load... timing advance can be a nasty cause of detonation, especially if you are running close on your AFR's...

just a related FYI... those resistor boxes that are sold on ebay that claim horsepower gains and such are usually just a potentiometer or a set resistor set that is wired in the intake air temp range... they fool the ecu by lowering the voltage on the intake air temp sensor, which has a side effect of raising advancing timing as well... just some food for thought to retard timing along the same route, if someone could wire up a voltage multiplier and do the opposite???
Reply
Old May 30, 2011 | 03:12 PM
  #24  
lookEVO's Avatar
lookEVO
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 988
Likes: 1
From: CO
Default

I know what youre saying, and im not saying youre wrong, but Im not saying Im wrong either. For simplicity sake, he isnt gonna do any harm to his car by running it. Stay sane and stay withing your cars capabilities to avoid breaking things, (within reason) if you start maxing any part on your car out... its time to upgrade. The people that run maxed out electronics or parts are the ones that break things.
Reply
Old May 30, 2011 | 04:32 PM
  #25  
Abelo's Avatar
Abelo
Thread Starter
Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Canada, Alberta, Calgary
Default

okay great help everyone thanks. well ill have sometime to install the safc this week as im not driving my car, came home one night and decided to do some pulls, was doing good at around 9-12.5 psi until my final pull and the compressor side of my turbo blew off and destroyed my compressor wheel, so now i have to rebuild my turbo for the third time and buy a new compressor wheel and a proper snap ring to hold it.

oh man i get some ****ty luck....
but great on the timing issue, the safc is just temporary until i get a power fc. but should do the trick
Reply
Old May 30, 2011 | 05:11 PM
  #26  
lookEVO's Avatar
lookEVO
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 988
Likes: 1
From: CO
Default

sounds like you need a different turbo...
Reply
Old May 30, 2011 | 07:32 PM
  #27  
Abelo's Avatar
Abelo
Thread Starter
Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Canada, Alberta, Calgary
Default

Originally Posted by lookEVO
sounds like you need a different turbo...
well it was burning alot of oil but i guess its also my fault for not fixing the oil drain issues. i have new bearings, housing, its basically brand new besides the ****ty oil and wheel issues
Reply
Old May 30, 2011 | 09:05 PM
  #28  
mitsuguy's Avatar
mitsuguy
Maintenance Moderator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,388
Likes: 27
From: AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Abelo
well it was burning alot of oil but i guess its also my fault for not fixing the oil drain issues. i have new bearings, housing, its basically brand new besides the ****ty oil and wheel issues
don't forget it will need to be balanced as well...
Reply
Old May 31, 2011 | 12:15 AM
  #29  
Abelo's Avatar
Abelo
Thread Starter
Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Canada, Alberta, Calgary
Default

ya i had it balanced and rebuilt before i blew it. the balancing is only 50 bucks at the shop by my house
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JZITALL
GS - 1st Gen (1993-1997)
0
Aug 15, 2015 03:48 PM
deputy865
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
7
Mar 25, 2014 02:24 PM
snsrushing
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
4
Jun 9, 2010 12:59 PM
snook
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
42
Dec 29, 2009 10:32 PM
Epik
1Gen GS300 Classifieds (91-97)
11
Apr 24, 2008 04:41 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:03 PM.