99SC42

iTrader: (44)

Have anyone used this guys? i call them today and they seem legit...
This a great alternative to make power without breaking the bank since the SC owners always trying to save money i figure i will share this with my fellow SC owners.
http://schneidercams.com/camshafts.aspx

99SC42

iTrader: (44)

I am about to send my cams to thiese guys , anybody used them before?
thanks

soardrft

iTrader: (8)

They are great and worth the money. They should have a review section as well as if you google them you won't see one bad review.

TLDriver

iTrader: (4)

I got some cams from a member here and Crower was the ones who did the regrind of them. I contacted DJ from Crower for some help, they all knew what they were talking about. His info from the emails:
David "DJ" Hernandez
CROWER RACING CAMS AND EQUIPMENT
6180 BUSINESS CENTER CT.
SAN DIEGO CA, 92154
dj@crower.com
Ph: 619-690-7831

Rising_Sun

iTrader: (2)

How much do they charge?

99SC42

iTrader: (44)

Ok cool thanks for the info bro.

Thanks Eddie i will call him tomorrow and see what he has to offer thanks again.

Todd these guys charge $145 for each cam which i think is more than fair.

Rising_Sun

iTrader: (2)

That sounds like a sweet deal. Maybe we can do a group buy.

HiPSI

iTrader: (2)

At $145.00 a cam you can't beat that to try!

What were there options on cam size?

RockRash

what's the specs on the cam? and over stock?

broda805

iTrader: (6)

i just sent mines to them i was quoted 125$ per cam, from what i recall the most popular was the 264 and 272 and they had more but i didn't inquire more on the matter

HiPSI

iTrader: (2)

Did you go with 272's? If so I would think stiffer valve springs would be necessary.

You should throw it back on the dyno and do a comparison pull to see how much was gained.

broda805

iTrader: (6)

i went over to supra forums and they had dyno overlays of a bunch of cams and the 264 looked like what i needed, the 272s dont look like it would benefit me too much unless your in the big power range with higher rpm

HiPSI

iTrader: (2)

Link to SF dyno / overlay?

I would agree, 264's are perfect for a stock motor / valve trained GE and upwards of 600-700whp.

The 272's really need to rev high to see the advantage, but they sound sick!

99SC42

iTrader: (44)

Exactly !! i would only do 272 on 71mm turbo and up, and the best combo on cams is the staggered setup IMO but each their own.
I would be getting the 272s.

http://www.supraforums.com/forum/sho...%27s+talk+cams

HiPSI

iTrader: (2)

That's a test done on real HKS cams, are these regrinds mimicking the hks spec for spec?

All of the info in that thread suggested to stay away from reversed staggered and most of the users agreed that 264/264 made overall more power, the 272's made more "peak" power but not until late in the powerband.