IS 98 GE motor with VVT-i interference?
#6
I've done work on several, and trust me its a non-interference motor. I did cam profiling for GSC Power Division and we did several combo's. Stock the 2JZ VVTi is non interference.
#7
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (3)
Where the Hell is Tres at on this one? Mr 2j dictionary himself...
Edit*
Interesting cuz......
http://www.troublecodes.net/tbelt/toyotatb.shtml
http://www.supraforums.com/forum/sho...I+Interference
http://www.supraforums.com/forum/sho...I+Interference
Consensus is the GE is and the GTE isn't.....thoughts?
Edit*
http://www.troublecodes.net/tbelt/toyotatb.shtml
http://www.supraforums.com/forum/sho...I+Interference
http://www.supraforums.com/forum/sho...I+Interference
Consensus is the GE is and the GTE isn't.....thoughts?
Last edited by 2jzlex; 09-11-09 at 02:56 PM.
Trending Topics
#10
Interesting, on all the VVTi's I've ever worked on or cam profiled ive never seen a one that was interference, ill try to dig up the old data, this was around 5 years ago that I did cam profiling for it, and based on all of my experience they werent, I am capable of being wrong however. The cams we made for it made it interference for sure.
#11
I also recall seeing something about interference in the shop manual that's specifically made for 98-2000 SC300 (big *** encyclopedia). Maybe i'll dig it up tomorrow to confirm. I should replace my timing belt soon, however, i don't have the VVTi bottom anymore, I have GTE bottom now otherwise i would have confirmed
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post