Performance & Maintenance Engine, forced induction, intakes, exhausts, torque converters, transmissions, etc.

Effects on increasing exhaust size in steps?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-07, 11:43 AM
  #31  
Skip Star
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
Skip Star's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: FL
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well...
Day one was pretty uneventful. We did do the trans filter and fluid, oil and filter, serpentine belt, air filter, and iridium plugs. So not a complete loss. BUT, the cats I ordered "for the Lexus SC400" were really just universal cats. The pre-cats are smaller and will bolt on so I will look for those. And the Flowmasters they sent me weren't offset right. The output pipe was centered. But we did get to drink a few beers and ponder the possibilities while looking at it. My friend wants to run true duals, just 2" pipe from the pre-cats to quieter muffs. I think I'll let him try it since I'm not paying. I still like the x-pipe idea but found many articles online about why you should use straight through mufflers, not baffled mufflers like Flowmasters, with an x-pipe. For sound of course. I think the car is plenty fast stock.
So I'm off to hunt for the correct pre-cats and research exhaust more.
Old 07-11-07, 04:48 PM
  #32  
Dougspeed
Lead Lap
iTrader: (2)
 
Dougspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 571
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by jgscott
Research, Cam Timing Principles, and Experience.

BTW, find " ONE " Dyno on the SC 400 that shows a X pipe shows increased HP across the Rev Range.
So what would be your proposed alternative to the X pipe, retaining the stock Y pipe or running a true dual?
Old 07-11-07, 07:55 PM
  #33  
mitsuguy
Maintenance Moderator

iTrader: (2)
 
mitsuguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 6,388
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dougspeed
So what would be your proposed alternative to the X pipe, retaining the stock Y pipe or running a true dual?
I am curious as well...

every V style motor I've ever worked with that wasn't turbocharged has benefitted from a H or X pipe versus true duals from each bank all the way back...

The stock solution is really just a big, restrictive X pipe... both banks combine into one, then they split back up - that's all an X pipe does... in theory for the best HP potential, each bank should have it's own exhaust, and to balance exhaust pulses, an X-pipe or H-pipe should be utilized...
Old 07-12-07, 11:36 AM
  #34  
sc30015
Driver
 
sc30015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i have 2.5" flowmaster 40 series sport on my 93 sc300 and it sounds AMAZING. i havent done anything else to my exhaust tho
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tmclaurin
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
5
01-16-17 12:28 PM
superpower
Performance & Maintenance
4
04-17-12 11:09 PM
iridebmx
SC- 1st Gen (1992-2000)
5
06-02-11 09:51 PM
diamondlex
ES - 1st to 4th Gen (1990-2006)
6
12-30-08 01:36 PM
carlos
Performance
3
07-17-07 01:53 PM



Quick Reply: Effects on increasing exhaust size in steps?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:18 AM.