Test Drove an LS 500
You win, I don't want a pissing contest here. However my LS430 seats are and it in general is way more comfortable than the 500 is. I like not hitting my head on the door frame each time I get in my top line Lexus. Luxury cars need lots of room inside which the 500 doesn't have. This is one of the reasons why so many people blow 100k on huge BOF trucks or large crossovers with tons of room now instead of swoopy sedan designs.
Per Motor Trend
0-60:
LS500 5.3; LS460 5.6.
Not trying to talk negative about your cars but dropping the V8 was a fatal mistake. .3 seconds is not a significant difference.
I've never heard anything but incredible engine praise for any V8 LS. Literally not one negative thing, other than maybe the 460 was a little slower than the competition.
Motor Trend said the 500 feels sluggish with moderate throttle and that the engine "struggles to move it"; even Consumer Reports said the car posts good numbers but doesn't feel particularly powerful in around town driving until the turbos spool. That's not necessarily a knock against this specific Lexus V6tt, it's just the turbo crap in general. Bring back the V8, IDK what Lexus was thinking. Lexus LS always held the crown of having the world's smoothest V8. That's dead and gone.
My 290hp V8 feels effortlessly powerful at any RPM. Great torque. Hardly ever goes above 2300 RPM. No waiting for anything. It's the perfect engine for a luxury car.
A friend of mine's parents bought a 500 who have always had LSs, he said it drives ok but sounds bad. They aren't happy with the V8 gone. There are lots of people, myself included, that have to have a V8 for the sound and feel. Especially in a luxury car.
No offense, I do not want to argue. But I still remember reading the original press release where they mentioned the V8 gone. Fatal mistake. Yeah and what happened to the power seatbelt anchors? That ooooozes luxury and I use it more than people would think. LS is the only car I can think of that used to have power height adjustable seatbelts that you controlled.
0-60:
LS500 5.3; LS460 5.6.
Not trying to talk negative about your cars but dropping the V8 was a fatal mistake. .3 seconds is not a significant difference.
I've never heard anything but incredible engine praise for any V8 LS. Literally not one negative thing, other than maybe the 460 was a little slower than the competition.
Motor Trend said the 500 feels sluggish with moderate throttle and that the engine "struggles to move it"; even Consumer Reports said the car posts good numbers but doesn't feel particularly powerful in around town driving until the turbos spool. That's not necessarily a knock against this specific Lexus V6tt, it's just the turbo crap in general. Bring back the V8, IDK what Lexus was thinking. Lexus LS always held the crown of having the world's smoothest V8. That's dead and gone.
My 290hp V8 feels effortlessly powerful at any RPM. Great torque. Hardly ever goes above 2300 RPM. No waiting for anything. It's the perfect engine for a luxury car.
A friend of mine's parents bought a 500 who have always had LSs, he said it drives ok but sounds bad. They aren't happy with the V8 gone. There are lots of people, myself included, that have to have a V8 for the sound and feel. Especially in a luxury car.
No offense, I do not want to argue. But I still remember reading the original press release where they mentioned the V8 gone. Fatal mistake. Yeah and what happened to the power seatbelt anchors? That ooooozes luxury and I use it more than people would think. LS is the only car I can think of that used to have power height adjustable seatbelts that you controlled.
It seems Lexus can't give these LS's away. The V-6 engine is a blunder, and their run flats was a bad move. Plus the vehicle is so damn complicated to operate. Lexus has really dropped the ball on this vehicle. They could have tweaked the V-8 in the current LC by putting in cylinder deactivation, and stop and start just to keep the EPA happy. (Of course the consumer could get to deactivate these features on the dashboard if they wanted to). How I think they got 4.6 second (I am baffled, as they still claim) 0-60 is by them doing their testing on a 5% downward gradient at 20 degrees Fahrenheit, (turbos run best in cold weather).
Having personally driven the LS on a test drive in 90 degree humid weather last summer was not a pleasant experience. The A/C did not blow cold, and I had to floor it to accelerate from a standstill to merge into traffic (and I do not like to do that at all), and modulating the acceleration when the turbos kicked in was a pain in the ***. It felt underpowered at speed-- it was not refined and it felt cramped inside. I miss the power height adjustable seatbelts, and there was no button to adjust the airflow on the dashboard. You had to go 3 screens into the infotainment system to do so.
This model deters the prospective buyer, and it alienates current long term Lexus consumer. I hope Lexus corporate responds by doing something about the drivetrain, and run flats, but all I see is them just adding touchscreen as a the major modification here. The more they ignore the needs of the consumer, the more this brand will lose business, and market share to players like Genesis.
Having personally driven the LS on a test drive in 90 degree humid weather last summer was not a pleasant experience. The A/C did not blow cold, and I had to floor it to accelerate from a standstill to merge into traffic (and I do not like to do that at all), and modulating the acceleration when the turbos kicked in was a pain in the ***. It felt underpowered at speed-- it was not refined and it felt cramped inside. I miss the power height adjustable seatbelts, and there was no button to adjust the airflow on the dashboard. You had to go 3 screens into the infotainment system to do so.
This model deters the prospective buyer, and it alienates current long term Lexus consumer. I hope Lexus corporate responds by doing something about the drivetrain, and run flats, but all I see is them just adding touchscreen as a the major modification here. The more they ignore the needs of the consumer, the more this brand will lose business, and market share to players like Genesis.
Last edited by Lexuss07; Dec 11, 2020 at 01:17 PM.
There is an eco setting for temperature that you should turn off when the temperatures go into the 90s. And if Climate Concierge is turned on it will keep you comfortable. That's what I do. I simply set the temperature that I want and Climate Concierge does the rest.
It seems Lexus can't give these LS's away. The V-6 engine is a blunder, and their run flats was a bad move. Plus the vehicle is so damn complicated to operate. Lexus has really dropped the ball on this vehicle. They could have tweaked the V-8 in the current LC by putting in cylinder deactivation, and stop and start just to keep the EPA happy. (Of course the consumer could get to deactivate these features on the dashboard if they wanted to). How I think they got 4.6 second (I am baffled, as they still claim) 0-60 is by them doing their testing on a 5% downward gradient at 20 degrees Fahrenheit, (turbos run best in cold weather).
Having personally driven the LS on a test drive in 90 degree humid weather last summer was not a pleasant experience. The A/C did not blow cold, and I had to floor it to accelerate from a standstill to merge into traffic (and I do not like to do that at all), and modulating the acceleration when the turbos kicked in was a pain in the ***. It felt underpowered at speed-- it was not refined and it felt cramped inside. I miss the power height adjustable seatbelts, and there was no button to adjust the airflow on the dashboard. You had to go 3 screens into the infotainment system to do so.
This model deters the prospective buyer, and it alienates current long term Lexus consumer. I hope Lexus corporate responds by doing something about the drivetrain, and run flats, but all I see is them just adding touchscreen as a the major modification here. The more they ignore the needs of the consumer, the more this brand will lose business, and market share to players like Genesis.
Having personally driven the LS on a test drive in 90 degree humid weather last summer was not a pleasant experience. The A/C did not blow cold, and I had to floor it to accelerate from a standstill to merge into traffic (and I do not like to do that at all), and modulating the acceleration when the turbos kicked in was a pain in the ***. It felt underpowered at speed-- it was not refined and it felt cramped inside. I miss the power height adjustable seatbelts, and there was no button to adjust the airflow on the dashboard. You had to go 3 screens into the infotainment system to do so.
This model deters the prospective buyer, and it alienates current long term Lexus consumer. I hope Lexus corporate responds by doing something about the drivetrain, and run flats, but all I see is them just adding touchscreen as a the major modification here. The more they ignore the needs of the consumer, the more this brand will lose business, and market share to players like Genesis.
Sedans are on life support in general, across the board.
We traded our 2019 ES350 Ultra Luxury March of this year for a 2020 LS500. As far as we are concerned the LS is by far much better than the ES350. Most of all we were very disappointed with the wind noise in the ES at highway speeds. The LS is quieter and the V6 turbo has plenty of power to spare. We have owned LS models from the LS400 to the LS460 and were not happy moving to the ES.
Joe
Joe
We traded our 2019 ES350 Ultra Luxury March of this year for a 2020 LS500. As far as we are concerned the LS is by far much better than the ES350. Most of all we were very disappointed with the wind noise in the ES at highway speeds. The LS is quieter and the V6 turbo has plenty of power to spare. We have owned LS models from the LS400 to the LS460 and were not happy moving to the ES.
Joe
Joe
Some days I kick myself for not springing for the LS500 in the first place since that's what I actually wanted. And then on other days I realize I have no real complaints with my ES and that at 30,000mi and a year and half of owning it, I'm deep into the worst its depreciation curve. Sigh.
I think my biggest hang up is the amount of driving I do in a "normal" (non-Covid) year, and that it feels like maybe too nice of a car to waste on such blah miles. With a 120mi roundtrip commute plus business trips, I can easily drive 30K or more in a year. What I really I ought to do, is have have the manager of the dealership call me when they have a like-new one they're going to certify or take of the loaner fleet. I would make the most of that unlimited mileage warranty! At the very least, it'd be a test to see how much goodwill buying three cars (my 19 ES UL, 21 RX Luxury, and certified '18 RX for MIL) from them in 2 years gets me!
Last edited by AllinCLE; Dec 28, 2020 at 01:32 PM.
I had an LS430 UL for twelve years. It was four years old when I bought it. When I sold the car, it had 106,000 miles on it. It still looked new inside and out. I loved it. I replaced it with a Porsche Cayenne diesel, which I have really enjoyed. So far, trouble free, but the maintenance costs are outrageous. The attitude of "if you can afford a Porsche, you shouldn't complain about maintenance costs. The Cayenne I have listed at about the cost of a base LS500. A new Cayenne is about the same price as a new well equipped Ls500, so the maintenance relative to price doesn't hold. I don't have the same confidence to own the Cayenne for as long as the LS430. Over the time I owned the LS430, the only problems I had were a failed air suspension (replaced with coils and springs), and a radiator replacement. I have been starting to look at certified LS500's. I have not driven one yet. I am also surprised that there aren't many out there, and the resale values are high. Perhaps I should wait six months until the 2018's start coming off of lease, whch would mean more supply.
I had an LS430 UL for twelve years. It was four years old when I bought it. When I sold the car, it had 106,000 miles on it. It still looked new inside and out. I loved it. I replaced it with a Porsche Cayenne diesel, which I have really enjoyed. So far, trouble free, but the maintenance costs are outrageous. The attitude of "if you can afford a Porsche, you shouldn't complain about maintenance costs. The Cayenne I have listed at about the cost of a base LS500. A new Cayenne is about the same price as a new well equipped Ls500, so the maintenance relative to price doesn't hold. I don't have the same confidence to own the Cayenne for as long as the LS430. Over the time I owned the LS430, the only problems I had were a failed air suspension (replaced with coils and springs), and a radiator replacement. I have been starting to look at certified LS500's. I have not driven one yet. I am also surprised that there aren't many out there, and the resale values are high. Perhaps I should wait six months until the 2018's start coming off of lease, whch would mean more supply.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
180ls1
ES - 1st to 6th Gen (1990-2018)
12
Jul 1, 2019 11:56 PM
docmarioce
LS - 4th Gen (2007-2017)
25
Sep 24, 2015 06:31 AM









