LS vs UX vs S-class frustrations
My frustration grew to new levels this week when I read about the new UX crossover coming to market later this year. It has some of the most advanced technology ever to be seen in a vehicle. It has predictive hybrid braking and battery management, meaning it gathers data the more you drive, and, based on your previous driving behaviour linked to GPS position, the vehicle is able to actively manage regenerative braking, highway coasting and recharge, etc.
Further, the airvents are accented with wireless technology each control's LED light source is wirelessly powered using EM resonance between two coils vibrating at the same frequency.
Ok, the airvent thing might be a bit gimmicky, but my point-is, shouldn't the LS, as the flagship, be the car that this new technology is debuting in? Especially this smart-hybrid system. Also, I'm a bit unimpressed with the lack of cutting-edge technology debuting in this new LS. For example, the two S-class cars I owned had night-vision, a cool feature where if pedestrians were detected at night, a panel of the LED lights would shift and highlight the people on the side of the road and flash three times to both draw my attention to them and their attention to me. It had a cool cabin fragrance atomizer, cylinder deactivation, configurable interior lighting, heated arm rests even.
As I said, I'm really a fan of the brand, and the service, but, all things considered, am I making the best-choice?
To that end, a large part of the Toyota reliability also comes from being conservative and staying with proven design and implementations. The LX570 were introduced in 2007 and remain largely the same car with the same engine. Mercedes has gone though 2 full generations of GL in that same time span.
The winter in your region is downright brutal. The LX570 is actually the perfect car for that. I would keep that and drive that thing to the ground, while perhaps look for something more dynamically interesting than the LS as the fun car.
My frustration grew to new levels this week when I read about the new UX crossover coming to market later this year. It has some of the most advanced technology ever to be seen in a vehicle. It has predictive hybrid braking and battery management, meaning it gathers data the more you drive, and, based on your previous driving behaviour linked to GPS position, the vehicle is able to actively manage regenerative braking, highway coasting and recharge, etc.
Further, the airvents are accented with wireless technology each control's LED light source is wirelessly powered using EM resonance between two coils vibrating at the same frequency.
Ok, the airvent thing might be a bit gimmicky, but my point-is, shouldn't the LS, as the flagship, be the car that this new technology is debuting in? Especially this smart-hybrid system. Also, I'm a bit unimpressed with the lack of cutting-edge technology debuting in this new LS. For example, the two S-class cars I owned had night-vision, a cool feature where if pedestrians were detected at night, a panel of the LED lights would shift and highlight the people on the side of the road and flash three times to both draw my attention to them and their attention to me. It had a cool cabin fragrance atomizer, cylinder deactivation, configurable interior lighting, heated arm rests even.
As I said, I'm really a fan of the brand, and the service, but, all things considered, am I making the best-choice?



