Replace Timing Belt After 108 months?
Changed mine at 10 years and 102k miles. Had them keep it so I could look. No cracks, ripples, anything. You could tell it had been used but I didn't see any signs of it "about to go bad." I could have easily gone way further, but I hear the 3-uZ is like a $12k motor, and the piece of mind is worth it.
If you dig up my threads started you can find the thread. I posted several pics of the belt.
Does anyone actually know how much a 3UZ would actually cost, new? Someone once said $18k on another forums.
If you dig up my threads started you can find the thread. I posted several pics of the belt.
Does anyone actually know how much a 3UZ would actually cost, new? Someone once said $18k on another forums.
I'm not in the market for one and never will be, but I'm curious how much the actual motors cost when the cars were new. Someone on another forum said it was an $18k engine. That sounds like a lot, but with the 6 bolt main design, FAA approval, and indestructibility (not to mention performance and refinement), I'd say the cost of a brand new one would be quite a pretty penny.
If it is an $18k engine and the LS started around 60k, that's 1/3 of the price of the car.
Devlyyn, that belt just looks so deteriorated that I may have to modify my thinking on the TB. I wonder if your LS spent most of its days in PA or was it in a hot climate?
I would also carefully examine your water pump, turn the shaft and see if perhaps it was binding. That alone would rapidly heat the belt and cause the deterioration that you saw.
I would also carefully examine your water pump, turn the shaft and see if perhaps it was binding. That alone would rapidly heat the belt and cause the deterioration that you saw.
The belts themselves rarely fail. The tensioners will. At higher mileage 150k+. Especially in Northern climates with all your snow and rusting and salt. This is why I always tell people to buy the Aisin kit that includes the tensioners. Loose a tensioner or bearing you will loose the belt.
I am talking about doing your first one at 90k as required and approaching your 2nd at 180k. If you skip the first then good luck. It makes sense to do the tensions every time you do the service.
I am talking about doing your first one at 90k as required and approaching your 2nd at 180k. If you skip the first then good luck. It makes sense to do the tensions every time you do the service.
Last edited by Lavrishevo; Feb 1, 2015 at 04:31 PM.
I'm just asking a theoretical question.
I'm not in the market for one and never will be, but I'm curious how much the actual motors cost when the cars were new. Someone on another forum said it was an $18k engine. That sounds like a lot, but with the 6 bolt main design, FAA approval, and indestructibility (not to mention performance and refinement), I'd say the cost of a brand new one would be quite a pretty penny.
If it is an $18k engine and the LS started around 60k, that's 1/3 of the price of the car.
I'm not in the market for one and never will be, but I'm curious how much the actual motors cost when the cars were new. Someone on another forum said it was an $18k engine. That sounds like a lot, but with the 6 bolt main design, FAA approval, and indestructibility (not to mention performance and refinement), I'd say the cost of a brand new one would be quite a pretty penny.
If it is an $18k engine and the LS started around 60k, that's 1/3 of the price of the car.
$18K would be an extremely high [st]ealer price, even with installation. Comparing $18K to the total 2004-06 list price of the car overstates the actual build cost of the vehicle vs. a rebuild. $6.5K is a retail list price today. Toyota actual cost for the 3UZ-FE is far less, and to install the engine at initial assembly just an allocated fraction of the per vehicle assembly cost. This discussion does highlight that a blown engine often spells junk yard for this, or most any vehicle, since it costs more to repair than the market value of the car.
Devlyyn, that belt just looks so deteriorated that I may have to modify my thinking on the TB. I wonder if your LS spent most of its days in PA or was it in a hot climate?
I would also carefully examine your water pump, turn the shaft and see if perhaps it was binding. That alone would rapidly heat the belt and cause the deterioration that you saw.
I would also carefully examine your water pump, turn the shaft and see if perhaps it was binding. That alone would rapidly heat the belt and cause the deterioration that you saw.
Something was definitely going on in that case that wasn't typical. I think 99 out of 100 cars' timing belts would have looked perfect after 105k miles.
Lexus records from NJ when it was first bought go up to around 60k miles. Carfax shows it was sold at several auctions between now and then. The rest of the car and engine is pristine. That, and the prevailing sentiment on this forum, is part of the reason I was so surprised to find the TB in this state. I guess someone has to be in that 1%
I was wondering the same thing, for a brief moment, if the odometer had been rolled back. Thats how bad that belt looks. I would definitely be scrutinizing the idler and tensioner pulleys, along with the pump to see if one of those failed and caused excessive frictional heating and wear.
Lexus records from NJ when it was first bought go up to around 60k miles. Carfax shows it was sold at several auctions between now and then. The rest of the car and engine is pristine. That, and the prevailing sentiment on this forum, is part of the reason I was so surprised to find the TB in this state. I guess someone has to be in that 1% 

Again, this is just internet speculation from someone that has never even seen the car, but for what most would consider low miles for the age of the car, that's usually not where well-kept cars bounce around.
The number is far less than 1% overall, and with only 115K miles, the number who have experienced what you have is even smaller ... which does open the serious question whether the odometer has been rolled back. You should examine all internal parts to determine and isolate what caused the belt to fray (so prematurely). The 3UZ-FE is like a fine Swiss watch, but your belt looks like something out of a GM-built car of the 60's with nylon timing chain and cam shaft gear.










