Gap between flagship and entry is widening
#16
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: JP (oki to be precise :D)
Posts: 4,918
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I know I can't afford an 80k car, so at 40k I have the choice of a new IS or a used LS, and I pick the LS. I still don't know who can justify a 40k ES but that's just me...
And great point about the new models...
And great point about the new models...
#17
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: az
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's the sign of the times. I'm not into business, but it doesn't take a genius to know they're trying to stay competitive. Unfortunately they are the builders and we are the buyers. We're stuck with what they come up with no matter how much we may like or frown on what they create.
#18
This is the attitude that nearly sunk the American car companies. We, as buyers, have the ultimate word in what sells and what doesn't. There are plenty of automotive choices and most folks aren't stuck on a single brand.
#19
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: az
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Absolutely! As car companies get so high on themselves they think they can come out with just about any product and consumers will buy it. Is this the case with Lexus or are they just spreading their wings? Who really knows, but as a loyal Lexus customer I will support their new products even if I don't agree with them.
#20
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: JP (oki to be precise :D)
Posts: 4,918
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
i seriously don't understand how you all can think of lexus as cheapening its image. used to be there were like 3 choices, a cheap entry car, the middle of the road car, or the LS. now the LS600hL and even the awd LS460L can reach 100k - 120+k. lexus is just now filling in those gaps and adding a more expensive and a less expensive version to the spectrum at the same time.
it just rubs me the wrong way (obviously) to hear of the brand image as cheapening,, how about we say they are diversifying...
I could say lexus is making their company more prestigious at the same time by having the LS600hL flagship.
____________
well now that i'm sober and went back and re-read the original post it doesn't seem like anyone wrote that the lex image was cheapening,, i could have swore thats what i read yesterday evening during my 5th rum and coke but whatever... i do think that lex is diversifying though... and i think we all know why they lost sales last year and why almost everyone else got more sale (those who were going to buy a new lex/toyota had to buy something ) i just hope the dems can focus on something else for the next few months instead of how to screw over toyota,, again...
it just rubs me the wrong way (obviously) to hear of the brand image as cheapening,, how about we say they are diversifying...
I could say lexus is making their company more prestigious at the same time by having the LS600hL flagship.
____________
well now that i'm sober and went back and re-read the original post it doesn't seem like anyone wrote that the lex image was cheapening,, i could have swore thats what i read yesterday evening during my 5th rum and coke but whatever... i do think that lex is diversifying though... and i think we all know why they lost sales last year and why almost everyone else got more sale (those who were going to buy a new lex/toyota had to buy something ) i just hope the dems can focus on something else for the next few months instead of how to screw over toyota,, again...
Last edited by sojah; 05-07-11 at 10:17 AM.
#21
Pole Position
i seriously don't understand how you all can think of lexus as cheapening its image. used to be there were like 3 choices, a cheap entry car, the middle of the road car, or the LS. now the LS600hL and even the awd LS460L can reach 100k - 120+k. lexus is just now filling in those gaps and adding a more expensive and a less expensive version to the spectrum at the same time.
it just rubs me the wrong way (obviously) to hear of the brand image as cheapening,, how about we say they are diversifying...
I could say lexus is making their company more prestigious at the same time by having the LS600hL flagship.
it just rubs me the wrong way (obviously) to hear of the brand image as cheapening,, how about we say they are diversifying...
I could say lexus is making their company more prestigious at the same time by having the LS600hL flagship.
A quick perusal of Lexus's sales figures (YTD) at:
http://lexusenthusiast.com/2011/05/0...-sales-report/
shows just how much these lower priced catagories bring to the table (volume wise), and as any bean counter thru ivory tower executive will tell you, volume cures many ills, even w/o the higher profit margin built into the LS models.
Last edited by mewhee; 05-07-11 at 10:40 AM.
#22
Lexus Test Driver
I have absolutely no problem with them expanding their range. In fact, I fully support it b/c it's necessary to compete with other brands. I just wished they had more distinctive styling on the recent stuff.
#23
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: JP (oki to be precise :D)
Posts: 4,918
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
mewhee thanks for that link with all the figures, i think the runaway fiasco is directly responsible for the decrease, but heavy is the head that wears the crown (toyota/lex)...
#24
Pole Position
It was startling to see the actual sales figures (units: YTD) whereby the IS outsells the LS over 3 to 1 and the ES outsells the LS almost 4 to 1.
Even recognizing the price differences, the LS comprises less than 5% of sales (in units) under the Lexus brand , thus the obvious need for 'diversity' as you put it, justifying the necessity of more affordable models under the Lexus name.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GFerg
Car Chat
140
04-25-07 03:11 PM