1998 Fuel Tank capacity
#2
#3
Lexus Test Driver
22.5 gallons
for something like this wouldn't you rather just google it and get an instant response rather than having to wait for someone to reply?
here you go
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=1998+ls400+fuel+tank+size
for something like this wouldn't you rather just google it and get an instant response rather than having to wait for someone to reply?
here you go
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=1998+ls400+fuel+tank+size
The following users liked this post:
BNastee (07-29-19)
#7
BahHumBug
iTrader: (10)
And this would be because.....?
22.5gal per Lexus.
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/att...998lsspecs.pdf
22.5gal per Lexus.
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/att...998lsspecs.pdf
Trending Topics
#8
#10
Lexus Test Driver
what's sort of annoying is that once you drop below like 27 or so miles of predicted range it just says LOW FUEL instead of continuing to give you range. one time i reset the trip computer once this came up, and used the trip computer to just slowly drive around until i got to what i believed was about 0 miles (i normally never let it get below 1/5 of a tank so please don't tell me it's a bad thing to do, i know it is but this was for science lol) and even then it only took like 21 gallons, the car wasn't actually showing any signs of being about to run out (coughing, sputtering)
someone correct me if i'm wrong but for whatever reason i think the 2000 LS 400 only has a 21.9 gallon tank, never understood why that was
someone correct me if i'm wrong but for whatever reason i think the 2000 LS 400 only has a 21.9 gallon tank, never understood why that was
#11
what's sort of annoying is that once you drop below like 27 or so miles of predicted range it just says LOW FUEL instead of continuing to give you range. one time i reset the trip computer once this came up, and used the trip computer to just slowly drive around until i got to what i believed was about 0 miles (i normally never let it get below 1/5 of a tank so please don't tell me it's a bad thing to do, i know it is but this was for science lol) and even then it only took like 21 gallons, the car wasn't actually showing any signs of being about to run out (coughing, sputtering)
someone correct me if i'm wrong but for whatever reason i think the 2000 LS 400 only has a 21.9 gallon tank, never understood why that was
someone correct me if i'm wrong but for whatever reason i think the 2000 LS 400 only has a 21.9 gallon tank, never understood why that was
#12
BahHumBug
iTrader: (10)
what's sort of annoying is that once you drop below like 27 or so miles of predicted range it just says LOW FUEL instead of continuing to give you range. one time i reset the trip computer once this came up, and used the trip computer to just slowly drive around until i got to what i believed was about 0 miles (i normally never let it get below 1/5 of a tank so please don't tell me it's a bad thing to do, i know it is but this was for science lol) and even then it only took like 21 gallons, the car wasn't actually showing any signs of being about to run out (coughing, sputtering)
someone correct me if i'm wrong but for whatever reason i think the 2000 LS 400 only has a 21.9 gallon tank, never understood why that was
someone correct me if i'm wrong but for whatever reason i think the 2000 LS 400 only has a 21.9 gallon tank, never understood why that was
Yes the 2000 LS400 has a 21.9 gallon tank (https://g.co/kgs/heFraf)
Correct, 21.9gal for the '00 model. It was likely due to the enhanced EVAP equipment present for that model year, specifically addition of the ORVR (on-board refueling vapor recovery).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fastegg
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
17
08-22-11 12:45 AM
qewani1
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
13
04-14-09 10:17 PM
UofACATS
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
16
05-30-08 02:46 PM