Notices
IS F (2008-2014) Discussion topics related to the IS F model

2008-2013 ISF are 0-60 times getting slower

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 13, 2013 | 05:36 PM
  #16  
ISF001's Avatar
ISF001
Pole Position
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,084
Likes: 4
From: PA
Default

Driver experience is the culprit.

Test drivers need to spend more than an hour or so in the car to master the F. There are guys running 4.2 in stock and new Fs.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2013 | 09:57 PM
  #17  
Rossi's Avatar
Rossi
Racer
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,408
Likes: 234
From: Ca
Default

Originally Posted by ISF001
Driver experience is the culprit.

Test drivers need to spend more than an hour or so in the car to master the F. There are guys running 4.2 in stock and new Fs.
^^^^^^^^ 100% agree.

4.6 sec is a reasonable number given by Lexus, as many high performance carmakers list numbers reachable by average Joe if they list 0-60 times at all.

If you look up Porsche 911s factory 0-60 times, very conservative.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2013 | 07:15 AM
  #18  
chrisp1's Avatar
chrisp1
Advanced
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 715
Likes: 29
From: RI
Default

Originally Posted by ISF001
Driver experience is the culprit.

Test drivers need to spend more than an hour or so in the car to master the F. There are guys running 4.2 in stock and new Fs.
wow! 4.2 is pretty impressive
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2013 | 09:04 PM
  #19  
Just F Me's Avatar
Just F Me
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,284
Likes: 23
From: SoCali
Default

Originally Posted by secondisf
I am just curious.

I owned a 2008 and now a 2012 ISF and every magazine seems to be showing much slower 0-60 and 1/4 mile times.

2008- 4.2 (0 to 60) and 12.7@ 114mph (1/4 mile)

2010-2013 4.5-4.8 (0-60) and 13.1@ 109mph (1/4 mile)

These are based on stock cars.

Just wondered if anyone else has noticed these differences.
Time to get a new car.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2013 | 10:44 AM
  #20  
Roffles's Avatar
Roffles
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 155
Likes: 15
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Rossi
^^^^^^^^ 100% agree.

4.6 sec is a reasonable number given by Lexus, as many high performance carmakers list numbers reachable by average Joe if they list 0-60 times at all.

If you look up Porsche 911s factory 0-60 times, very conservative.
I agree. It's obvious Lexus' claimed 4.6 second acceleration number is a "stomp and go" number with traction control engaged, sport mode enabled, and automatic up-shifts. You'll notice that higher end performance cars that do 0-60 in under 4 seconds all have a launch control procedure to get that number. In most cases, that launch control procedure can't be setup quickly enough or timed right for a stoplight race so it's a bogus number in the real world.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2013 | 10:48 PM
  #21  
secondisf's Avatar
secondisf
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Just F Me
Time to get a new car.
??? Did I miss something
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2013 | 09:07 AM
  #22  
Ninja10r's Avatar
Ninja10r
Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 139
Likes: 5
From: DMV
Default

my 2011 was faster than my 2008, but so many other things to consider its a day to day toss up, track conditions , weather, tires, da, just a few things that will affect 0-60 and 1/4 mile times
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2013 | 05:07 PM
  #23  
ISF001's Avatar
ISF001
Pole Position
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,084
Likes: 4
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by Roffles
I agree. It's obvious Lexus' claimed 4.6 second acceleration number is a "stomp and go" number with traction control engaged, sport mode enabled, and automatic up-shifts. You'll notice that higher end performance cars that do 0-60 in under 4 seconds all have a launch control procedure to get that number. In most cases, that launch control procedure can't be setup quickly enough or timed right for a stoplight race so it's a bogus number in the real world.
. Yep...it's called marketing.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2013 | 06:37 PM
  #24  
Juanca's Avatar
Juanca
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 3
From: Miami, FL
Default

I've been driving the ISF for over 5 years, 3.8yr on a 2008 and 1.5yr on a 2012. I always go to the same track thoughout the year, so same track, same driver, same way of driving. My 2012 is slower than my 2008 from a dig, all the time. From a roll they're the same, through corners the 2012 feels better.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2014 | 10:28 PM
  #25  
BluISF's Avatar
BluISF
Rookie
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Juanca
I've been driving the ISF for over 5 years, 3.8yr on a 2008 and 1.5yr on a 2012. I always go to the same track thoughout the year, so same track, same driver, same way of driving. My 2012 is slower than my 2008 from a dig, all the time. From a roll they're the same, through corners the 2012 feels better.
Interesting. Thanks for your comments.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2014 | 11:05 PM
  #26  
t4orce's Avatar
t4orce
Rookie
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: Western Australia
Default

Is there a weight difference in the favour of the older models? Maybe that explains off the line peppiness of the older models.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2014 | 05:32 PM
  #27  
ISF001's Avatar
ISF001
Pole Position
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,084
Likes: 4
From: PA
Default

Stock 2011 ISF First Try




Driver and environment. The car has no problem hitting the lower 4s.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2014 | 07:29 PM
  #28  
Endgame's Avatar
Endgame
Driver
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Default

Looks like 4.4 if not better to me.....
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2014 | 12:03 AM
  #29  
Shervin350's Avatar
Shervin350
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 462
Likes: 2
From: Harris
Default

is the same case for is350
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2014 | 04:50 AM
  #30  
WillRockwe's Avatar
WillRockwe
Pole Position
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 367
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Default

This site, which lists 0-60 times, places the 2011 IS-F at 4.2 sec.
http://www.zeroto60times.com/Lexus-0-60-mph-Times.html
Autorooster places it at 4.5 sec
http://www.autorooster.com/0-60-times/lexus/is-f/
MotorTrend claims 4.3 sec for the 2011 model
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...e/viewall.html

One big difference in 0-60 times for the F is, what mode did you use? Both standard and sport mode work to minimize wheelspin, so the fastest 0-60 times would come from disabling the stability systems and relying on a talented right foot.
On a personal note, I've never yet had a car get past me in a 1v1 on the highway.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:49 PM.