The Maker
Note its also going to change if you are lowered as the car will toe in further due to the steering link angle. I will try to derive the equivalent when lowered 1" up front. right now my toe settings were at 0.0 and 0.5.
Pole Position
Quote:
FWIW, I'm still doing very well with the new settings. No evidence at all of any abnormal inner edge wear.
I found a place that claims their alignment machine measures in millimeters. I am going to take your data sheet, provided earlier in the thread, over to them and see if they can match it.Originally Posted by lobuxracer
Stop looking at the green lights and set the toe correctly. I've never seen a good alignment tech at any of the high volume places.FWIW, I'm still doing very well with the new settings. No evidence at all of any abnormal inner edge wear.
I'll let you guys know when I get the results.
lobuxracer
Tech Resource
close
- Join DateJul 2006
- LocationGeorgia
- Posts:23,078
-
iTrader Positive Feedback100
-
iTrader Feedback Score(2)
-
Likes:2,299
-
Liked:4,745 Times in 2,859 Posts
Quote:
1) the 1/32" to 1/16" of toe out is measured at the tread radius, and
2) the 1/32" to 1/16" of toe is PER WHEEL and not total
then that equates to .13° to .26° of toe out at each wheel.
lobux, thanks a lot for creating this thread. I'll be taking your alignment spec PDF to Speedware this week and have them align to those specs.
It's not per wheel. It's total toe. Per wheel is pretty bogus as a measurement, there's a lot of difficulty in calling a "per wheel" measurement accurate.Originally Posted by mugenh22a4
Okay, so I measured a rolling diameter of 26.75" on my front RE050A's. Assuming that:1) the 1/32" to 1/16" of toe out is measured at the tread radius, and
2) the 1/32" to 1/16" of toe is PER WHEEL and not total
then that equates to .13° to .26° of toe out at each wheel.
lobux, thanks a lot for creating this thread. I'll be taking your alignment spec PDF to Speedware this week and have them align to those specs.
How did you measure 26.75"? By specification it should be very close to 26.09".
Lead Lap
Quote:
How did you measure 26.75"? By specification it should be very close to 26.09".
Tape measure. I had a friend spot for me from a distanceOriginally Posted by lobuxracer
It's not per wheel. It's total toe. Per wheel is pretty bogus as a measurement, there's a lot of difficulty in calling a "per wheel" measurement accurate.How did you measure 26.75"? By specification it should be very close to 26.09".
lobuxracer
Tech Resource
close
- Join DateJul 2006
- LocationGeorgia
- Posts:23,078
-
iTrader Positive Feedback100
-
iTrader Feedback Score(2)
-
Likes:2,299
-
Liked:4,745 Times in 2,859 Posts
I wouldn't trust that tape measurement for this.
Lead Lap
Since we have the experts on this thread, when should I look to do an Alignment on my car?
My car has almost 34k miles on it, not seeing any issues with uneven tire wear (on 2nd set of tires). I don't track the car, it just sees alot of highway driving. On the highway I do notice it pulls alot to the right, more then it did when new. Tire pressure is in check and the tires look good. No bubbles or other irregularities.
My car has almost 34k miles on it, not seeing any issues with uneven tire wear (on 2nd set of tires). I don't track the car, it just sees alot of highway driving. On the highway I do notice it pulls alot to the right, more then it did when new. Tire pressure is in check and the tires look good. No bubbles or other irregularities.
Lead Lap
ok getting new tires soon..can someone just tell me what to tell the alignment monkeys to set it to....dont wanna ruin a new set of tires...my car has stock 18" wheels and is not lowerd..and it is a is350...thanks

lobuxracer
Tech Resource
close
- Join DateJul 2006
- LocationGeorgia
- Posts:23,078
-
iTrader Positive Feedback100
-
iTrader Feedback Score(2)
-
Likes:2,299
-
Liked:4,745 Times in 2,859 Posts
Quote:
Click here.Originally Posted by rselby
ok getting new tires soon..can someone just tell me what to tell the alignment monkeys to set it to....dont wanna ruin a new set of tires...my car has stock 18" wheels and is not lowerd..and it is a is350...thanks
Pole Position
are these specs good for all wheel sizes?
im on 19s and lowered with megan coils
i just checked my front tires yesterday and the inner is like 50% left and the outer still has like 90%. i have falken fk452s, and just bought these tires brand new about 4-5 months ago.
im on 19s and lowered with megan coils
i just checked my front tires yesterday and the inner is like 50% left and the outer still has like 90%. i have falken fk452s, and just bought these tires brand new about 4-5 months ago.

Lexus Champion
Quote:
FYI - one full turn equates to 3mm toe change on the side you adjust. I'll be resetting my toe to the factory spec on track days by lengthening the link 1/2 turn.
My cross camber is excellent, and with the car static, both sides read -1.0 degrees. I'd rather have -2.0, but at least they're the same. Rear cross camber isn't quite as good with -1.0 on one side and -0.7 on the other. Oddly enough, Jeff told me the right rear was actually toed out, so they corrected the rear toe, and reset the front toe to arrive at the numbers on the attached pdf.
I'm going to see how this wears, but I suspect it will be dramatically better. In theory, dynamic toe should be inward, so with a very slight outward toe, it might actually go to zero while cruising the freeway. In any case, I'll be monitoring it and reporting back what I find. I'm making an 1800 mile trip over the weekend, so I'll have some initial findings pretty quickly.
Is it safe to ask for a Zero Toe at an alignment shop?Originally Posted by lobuxracer
So here's the spec sheet. It had 1/8" toe out from the factory, which is great for performance and terrible for tire wear. I had Jeff at Gran Turismo cut it back to 1/16" or from a little over 3mm to about 1.5mm. I'm going to see how this wears for street driving. Jeff also put some match marks on the toe links so I can toe it back out for track days.FYI - one full turn equates to 3mm toe change on the side you adjust. I'll be resetting my toe to the factory spec on track days by lengthening the link 1/2 turn.
My cross camber is excellent, and with the car static, both sides read -1.0 degrees. I'd rather have -2.0, but at least they're the same. Rear cross camber isn't quite as good with -1.0 on one side and -0.7 on the other. Oddly enough, Jeff told me the right rear was actually toed out, so they corrected the rear toe, and reset the front toe to arrive at the numbers on the attached pdf.
I'm going to see how this wears, but I suspect it will be dramatically better. In theory, dynamic toe should be inward, so with a very slight outward toe, it might actually go to zero while cruising the freeway. In any case, I'll be monitoring it and reporting back what I find. I'm making an 1800 mile trip over the weekend, so I'll have some initial findings pretty quickly.
im going in for an alignment tomorrow...will try to use this spec sheet as a baseline...i am however on 20s and dropped with more negative camber soo well see how it goes
Driver School Candidate
I used these specs for my alignment yesterday. Car tracks straight and hopefully I have better tire wear! Thanks for the info!
ok so i got my alignment done today. steering feels heavier and i seem to feel more vibrations on the road...dont know if thats normal or not. here is the spec sheet. plz let me know if this is ok


lobuxracer
Tech Resource
close
- Join DateJul 2006
- LocationGeorgia
- Posts:23,078
-
iTrader Positive Feedback100
-
iTrader Feedback Score(2)
-
Likes:2,299
-
Liked:4,745 Times in 2,859 Posts
^^the car is too low in the back. Caster should not exceed the OEM spec. When it does, the relationship between front and rear ride height is wrong. In your case, the rear is too low.
The amount of camber you have in the rear is also problematic. Anything over -2.5 can induce inside edge wear regardless of toe.
Since you are making a fashion statement with how low your car is, you can expect you'll have to pay for it with accelerated tire wear, and handling significantly diminished from a stock vehicle - I guarantee you with roll centers as low as you have, the car does not successfully negotiate a timed course faster than a stock IS F. I'd bet money your roll centers are below ground level and your roll couple is massive compared to stock.
The amount of camber you have in the rear is also problematic. Anything over -2.5 can induce inside edge wear regardless of toe.
Since you are making a fashion statement with how low your car is, you can expect you'll have to pay for it with accelerated tire wear, and handling significantly diminished from a stock vehicle - I guarantee you with roll centers as low as you have, the car does not successfully negotiate a timed course faster than a stock IS F. I'd bet money your roll centers are below ground level and your roll couple is massive compared to stock.






