IS F (2008-2014) Discussion topics related to the IS F model
View Poll Results: What will be the IS-F final HP number
400-405
8
5.00%
405-410
7
4.38%
410-415
13
8.13%
415-420
25
15.63%
420-425
56
35.00%
Over 425, I was thinking like 600.....
51
31.88%
Voters: 160. You may not vote on this poll

What will be the IS-F hp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-18-07, 07:41 PM
  #46  
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
 
TRDFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lobuxracer
Bad news for the high rpm lovers. The 2UR-FSE in the LS600h has the following specs: 94.0 × 89.5 (3.70 × 3.52) bore & stroke.

So, instead of boring the engine or boring and stroking, they just stroked it out to 4969cc and called it good enough to be 5 liters.

The block does have 6 bolt mains just like the 2GR series, and there is a very complete explanation of VVTi-E on the TIS website in the new car features book. Apparently Toyco have discovered that using oil pressure to operate VVTi is not nearly as reliable as using an electric motor that works very similarly to the motor in the throttlebody.

There's a lot more, but without a TIS subscription, well,... it would take a long time to retype it all...

What will be really interesting will be checking the part numbers for the 2GR-FSE, 2UR-FSE and 2UR-GSE pistons. If they are all the same, well, no big deal, but if they are different, we know they're all 94mm bore, but the compression ratios could be different and might be what we'd need to lower compression in the 2GR for boost. Food for thought anyway.
It will be interesting indeed.

Something to keep in mind: the IS-F redlines at 7000 RPM, higher than any other Lexus at the moment, and the 2UR-GSE does so likely without breaking a sweat. Also, I don't know for sure but I am willing to bet that just like the 2GR-FSE, the 2UR-GSE will have cold-forged rocker arms, high tension chain, and high-strength connecting rods allowing for high RPM operation. I'm also willing to bet some of the parts of the 2UR-GSE will differ from the 2UR-FSE, again allowing for higher RPM operation (apart from the obvious differences that will be present in the cylinder head).

After all the TSIBs for VVTi oil control valves failing, and another TSIB for the 4GR-FSE to replace the VVTi unit on two of the four cams, I'd say they're not pleased with the reliability of the oil controlled VVTi system.
The electronic control apart from offering far better precision in valve timing, does indeed offer improved reliability from what I've heard. The next step of course is Dual VVT-iE. The question then is not if Toyota is going to do it, but when will we see Dual VVT-iE. The rumour going around these days is Toyota ultimately wants to move to a fully electronic VVT system. I'm also interested in whether Valvematic is electronically controlled or regulated in any way, or does it have the same inherent problems and limits of BMW's mechanical Valvetronic.

Last edited by TRDFantasy; 07-18-07 at 07:45 PM.
Old 07-18-07, 08:05 PM
  #47  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,207
Received 3,849 Likes on 2,334 Posts
Default

International was supposed to release a cam-less engine in 2007 for over the road trucks. It's only a matter of time, the hard problems have been solved, they just need extensive reliability testing to prove the new system's worth. It will be awesome to be able to infinitely optimise cam timing for rpm, load, and power/economy.
Old 07-18-07, 08:09 PM
  #48  
MR_F1
Lexus Champion
 
MR_F1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lobuxracer
And here's why. If the 2UR is anything like the 2GR/4GR, there is little to fear.

hmmm 6 bolt mains. Thought it was 4, I never noticed that it was bolted laterally. Is the crank forged? what about the rods?
Originally Posted by TRDFantasy
Not sure about boost, as this particular 2GR remains naturally aspirated. What I can tell you is the 2GR-FZE (supercharged 2GR-FE) over in Australia in the TRD Aurion makes about 325HP. I'm guessing it can handle boost quite well, although in N/A form the 2GR-FSE can reach very high figures.

Go to www.teamlexus.com/default.html and click on "car". It actually lists the specs at 470+ HP and 350+ lb-ft. The Lexus Quarterly Magazine also had some info on the GT2 cars, but it looks like Lexus.com has taken down that info.
What I was getting at was that you said that the engine has relatively few modifications.
Old 07-18-07, 08:21 PM
  #49  
BernieIS
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
BernieIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

400 HP out of 5 Liter V8 right?
Old 07-18-07, 08:38 PM
  #50  
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
 
TRDFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MR_F1
hmmm 6 bolt mains. Thought it was 4, I never noticed that it was bolted laterally. Is the crank forged? what about the rods?

What I was getting at was that you said that the engine has relatively few modifications.
Both the crank and rods are forged. I'm quite sure this applies to all of Toyota's new generation engines.

I'm still trying to dig up the info directly from Team Lexus about the engine and what mods they did to it. The info may have been posted on the Lexus Magazine, and seeing as any IS350 GT2 info seems to have been taken down, unfortunately I may not be able to get a link for you, but I'll see what I can dig up.

Originally Posted by lobuxracer
International was supposed to release a cam-less engine in 2007 for over the road trucks. It's only a matter of time, the hard problems have been solved, they just need extensive reliability testing to prove the new system's worth. It will be awesome to be able to infinitely optimise cam timing for rpm, load, and power/economy.
After looking over some of the TIS info on the VVT-iE system, the camshaft control motor looks oddly similar to the actuator seen in Toyota's Valvematic diagram. Valvematic could in fact be electronically controlled.

Last edited by TRDFantasy; 07-18-07 at 08:45 PM.
Old 07-18-07, 09:42 PM
  #51  
MR_F1
Lexus Champion
 
MR_F1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRDFantasy
Both the crank and rods are forged. I'm quite sure this applies to all of Toyota's new generation engines.

I'm still trying to dig up the info directly from Team Lexus about the engine and what mods they did to it. The info may have been posted on the Lexus Magazine, and seeing as any IS350 GT2 info seems to have been taken down, unfortunately I may not be able to get a link for you, but I'll see what I can dig up.
Its ok. I read all of the magazine releases with the build. I can't recall what mods they did to the engine, if they did indeed state. Lovely to know that both Crank and Rods are forged. Hmm forged internals and dual injection..... does anybody have low compression pistons and a turbo kit in the making for any of these engines yet?


Back on topic......

About the retired supra GT and it's modified 3UZ engine...
The racing car's 4.5-liter gas engine develops 480 horsepower and 376 pound-feet of torque...
I'm hoping that the IS-F would at least match the C63 within 5hp, however, being more practical, I decided to do a few calculations.

After a lot of calculations, I've figured that the specific output of the UR series engine is at least 20.5% better than that of the older UZ series.

In theory, a similarly modified UR *should* produce at least 635hp. Making a few assumptions and taking a few liberties with the calculations, I've concluded that the IS-F will ring in at 435hp, +/- 10hp (for the amt of rounding off I used along the way). Any takers?
Old 07-18-07, 11:36 PM
  #52  
olorin
Driver School Candidate
 
olorin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Western Cape
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRDFantasy
I'm not sure if there is a link to the original PR from Lexus Europe, but I know flipside909 got the PR info directly from Lexus. Rest assured, the engine code is 2UR-GSE for the IS-F .
I want to quote the press release on another forum, but there are numbers missing, a case error or two, etc. I won't be able to verify its authenticity without a link to the original.
Old 07-19-07, 10:24 AM
  #53  
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
 
TRDFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MR_F1
Its ok. I read all of the magazine releases with the build. I can't recall what mods they did to the engine, if they did indeed state. Lovely to know that both Crank and Rods are forged. Hmm forged internals and dual injection..... does anybody have low compression pistons and a turbo kit in the making for any of these engines yet?

I'm hoping that the IS-F would at least match the C63 within 5hp, however, being more practical, I decided to do a few calculations.

After a lot of calculations, I've figured that the specific output of the UR series engine is at least 20.5% better than that of the older UZ series.

In theory, a similarly modified UR *should* produce at least 635hp. Making a few assumptions and taking a few liberties with the calculations, I've concluded that the IS-F will ring in at 435hp, +/- 10hp (for the amt of rounding off I used along the way). Any takers?
As best as I recall, there were some mods to the cylinder heads/top end of the engine, but the bottom end I believe remained completely stock. Dry sump lubrication is definitely one mod I remember being added to the engine. It's definitely modified less than the race-spec 3UZ, which is bored-out compared to a stock 3UZ.

One thing that slipped out of my mind is that Lexus likely does not want the IS-F to qualify for the gas guzzler tax. With that in mind, they'll have to tune it a bit conservatively/towards fuel economy.

And I agree: a race spec 2UR should very easily exceed 500HP. The UZ series has been out for almost 20 years, and there has been a lot of development on those engines. With each passing year, the UR series engines will only get better and we will see more and more of their true potential.
Old 07-19-07, 10:17 PM
  #54  
flipside909
Lexus Connoisseur
 
flipside909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 19,801
Received 531 Likes on 280 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BernieIS
400 HP out of 5 Liter V8 right?
More than 400 hp from a 5.0L V8.
Old 07-20-07, 12:07 AM
  #55  
MR_F1
Lexus Champion
 
MR_F1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by flipside909
More than 400 hp from a 5.0L V8.
I ask again.......... your vote was?
Old 07-20-07, 06:26 PM
  #56  
is-fan
Driver
 
is-fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: MD
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I get the feeling that flipside knows something that we don't

Originally Posted by MR_F1
I ask again.......... your vote was?
Originally Posted by flipside909
More than 400 hp from a 5.0L V8.

Last edited by is-fan; 07-20-07 at 07:22 PM.
Old 07-20-07, 08:56 PM
  #57  
Carbman
Driver School Candidate
 
Carbman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

More grist for the hp mill......Several months ago someone posted these general specs for the 2UR-FSE to be used in the IS-F. Not sure how accurate they are, specially the estimated power figures....

5.0L 90 degree V8 with dual VVT-i
Aluminum block and heads
Lightweight forged and sintered connecting rods for greater efficiency, revability, and reliability
Forged steel crankshaft with 8 balancers
Lightweight moly coated pistons
Direct injection and air assisted port injection
Larger intake and exhaust ports and slightly larger valves for increased performance
Performance tuning

Estimated power
430-450hp
400-440lb-ft

Now this is probably the mother of all stupid mechanical questions, but if it does have slightly larger valves, would that not be an indication they achieved the extra 0.4L by enlarging the bore rather than stroking? Please be gentle with your answer, I freely admit to being "wrench" challenged.
Old 07-20-07, 09:50 PM
  #58  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,207
Received 3,849 Likes on 2,334 Posts
Default

No, most engines will go 2mm over on valve size without any additional bore. Street heads focus on velocity at lower rpm, so the ports tend to be smaller. Making them bigger gives more top end, which is why we port and go oversize on valves, but it also takes away from the streetability because the low port velocity in the bottom end of the rpm scale means less torque until the engine revs up. Hopefully this will be possible to "fix" with increasingly variable valve timing and (hopefully) lift.

BTW, most of the features you are describing are available right now in the LS600h. Only the description of the ports and valves is different.
Old 07-20-07, 11:37 PM
  #59  
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
 
TRDFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes, that description above basically fits for the LS600h, as well as the LS460. That description does not give details on the IS-F's unique cylinder head design. Also, the IS-F's exhaust will differ from the IS350. That description also doesn't mention that the engine will have VVT-iE on the intake.
Old 07-21-07, 01:28 AM
  #60  
*wishlist*
Driver
 
*wishlist*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: California
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

some good discussion in here. i'm clicked >425 option. at least that's what i'm hoping for.


Quick Reply: What will be the IS-F hp?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:38 PM.