View Poll Results: What will be the IS-F final HP number
400-405
8
5.00%
405-410
7
4.38%
410-415
13
8.13%
415-420
25
15.63%
420-425
56
35.00%
Over 425, I was thinking like 600.....
51
31.88%
Voters: 160. You may not vote on this poll
What will be the IS-F hp?
#19
Hi All. I'm a new member here and just registered tonight. I'm stoked about the IS-F.
My estimate/quess is 437 hp, and I'll let you try to figure out how I came up with that number My torque estimate is 376 foot-pounds.
Does the person with the closest guess win a prize? LOL
My estimate/quess is 437 hp, and I'll let you try to figure out how I came up with that number My torque estimate is 376 foot-pounds.
Does the person with the closest guess win a prize? LOL
#20
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Western Cape
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did some calculations this afternoon. Excuse the lack of hp and ft-lbs.
Let's take two existing engines:
283kW: 62kW/L
498Nm: 108Nm/L
For the IS350:
228kW: 65kW/L
375Nm: 107Nm/L
My speculation entails extrapolation of the highest specific figures, for starters. This leaves us with:
65kW/L x 5.0L = 325kW
108Nm/L = 540Nm
Given the IS350's 228kW at 6400r/min (of 6500 usable revs), and the IS-F's red line at 7000r/min (see here), I conclude that 436hp is fairly conservative.
My estimation is 330kW/540Nm.
Let's take two existing engines:
- 4.6-litre V8 from the LS460
- 3.5-litre V6 from the IS350
283kW: 62kW/L
498Nm: 108Nm/L
For the IS350:
228kW: 65kW/L
375Nm: 107Nm/L
My speculation entails extrapolation of the highest specific figures, for starters. This leaves us with:
65kW/L x 5.0L = 325kW
108Nm/L = 540Nm
Given the IS350's 228kW at 6400r/min (of 6500 usable revs), and the IS-F's red line at 7000r/min (see here), I conclude that 436hp is fairly conservative.
My estimation is 330kW/540Nm.
#22
Lexus Champion
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dark side of the moon
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#23
Hmm...Those numbers are within plus/minus one of my unscientific guestimates. I guess we will have to wait and see. I read somewhere on here that there would be an August press release regarding the IS-F. Maybe they will release more information about it then.
Here is a related topic on autospies:
http://www.autospies.com/news/How-Mu...ut-With-17730/
Here is a related topic on autospies:
http://www.autospies.com/news/How-Mu...ut-With-17730/
Last edited by is-fan; 07-16-07 at 08:39 PM.
#24
Lexus Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Let's not forget that the 5.0L 2GR-GSE isn't just an enlarged 4.6L. Apart from having a higher redline and slightly more displacement, the engine has unique cylinder heads (G heads, which haven't been seen on a new Toyota engine in years) compared to the "F" heads of the 4.6L 1UR-FSE.
In Toyota terminology, "F" cylinder heads refer to economy narrow-angle DOHC. "G" heads refer to performance wide-angle DOHC. Plus, seeing as this is not a regular Lexus, but a high-performance Lexus, the engine may be tuned more towards performance, and less towards fuel economy.
For a rough comparison, the race-spec 3.5L V6 2GR-FSE that was to be used in the IS350 GT2 cars in ALMS makes over 470HP and about 330 lb-ft. Now although this is a race-spec engine, it has a lot less displacement than the IS-F's 5.0L, and the IS-F was developed with a lot of motorsport and racing input.
With all this in mind, estimates of 415 - 425HP do seem overly conservative.
In Toyota terminology, "F" cylinder heads refer to economy narrow-angle DOHC. "G" heads refer to performance wide-angle DOHC. Plus, seeing as this is not a regular Lexus, but a high-performance Lexus, the engine may be tuned more towards performance, and less towards fuel economy.
For a rough comparison, the race-spec 3.5L V6 2GR-FSE that was to be used in the IS350 GT2 cars in ALMS makes over 470HP and about 330 lb-ft. Now although this is a race-spec engine, it has a lot less displacement than the IS-F's 5.0L, and the IS-F was developed with a lot of motorsport and racing input.
With all this in mind, estimates of 415 - 425HP do seem overly conservative.
#27
Lexus Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/sho...IS-F+europe+PR
#28
Tech Info Resource
iTrader: (2)
Let's not forget that the 5.0L 2GR-GSE isn't just an enlarged 4.6L. Apart from having a higher redline and slightly more displacement, the engine has unique cylinder heads (G heads, which haven't been seen on a new Toyota engine in years) compared to the "F" heads of the 4.6L 1UR-FSE.
In Toyota terminology, "F" cylinder heads refer to economy narrow-angle DOHC. "G" heads refer to performance wide-angle DOHC. Plus, seeing as this is not a regular Lexus, but a high-performance Lexus, the engine may be tuned more towards performance, and less towards fuel economy.
For a rough comparison, the race-spec 3.5L V6 2GR-FSE that was to be used in the IS350 GT2 cars in ALMS makes over 470HP and about 330 lb-ft. Now although this is a race-spec engine, it has a lot less displacement than the IS-F's 5.0L, and the IS-F was developed with a lot of motorsport and racing input.
With all this in mind, estimates of 415 - 425HP do seem overly conservative.
In Toyota terminology, "F" cylinder heads refer to economy narrow-angle DOHC. "G" heads refer to performance wide-angle DOHC. Plus, seeing as this is not a regular Lexus, but a high-performance Lexus, the engine may be tuned more towards performance, and less towards fuel economy.
For a rough comparison, the race-spec 3.5L V6 2GR-FSE that was to be used in the IS350 GT2 cars in ALMS makes over 470HP and about 330 lb-ft. Now although this is a race-spec engine, it has a lot less displacement than the IS-F's 5.0L, and the IS-F was developed with a lot of motorsport and racing input.
With all this in mind, estimates of 415 - 425HP do seem overly conservative.
#29
Lexus Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I seriously doubt the included valve angle will be more than the 15 degrees we see on the F heads. All the bike engines (including Yamaha's) have extremely narrow included angles on the valves these days, and bikes are not having any issues with specific output. The only reason the engineer's don't like this in cars is because it makes the hood line higher. Maybe the engineers will win one this time and get the head design more modern than the last G heads that used 1960's pentroof technology.
I am guessing the G heads for the IS-F were designed collaboratively with Toyota (and some motorsports input) and Yamaha. I am quite confident these G heads will be a modern design. Considering the fact that the 2UR uses a lot of tricked out tech like dual injectors per cylinder and electronically driven intake VVT, there is huge performance potential that can be extracted out the engine; more so than what Team Lexus did with the 2GR-FSE in the IS350 GT2 cars.
Last edited by TRDFantasy; 07-17-07 at 05:23 PM.
#30
Tech Info Resource
iTrader: (2)
I'm still pretty convinced Toyota typically builds an engine with twice the stock output, tests it extensively for durability and performance, then detunes it to half the power they made in development. I've seen far too many Toyota engines fully capable of supporting twice their stock output with few if any changes to the long block. Just one of the reasons I buy their stuff!
Also, FWIW, the IS350 makes 51 hp per cylinder. If we just added two cylinders with no other changes we'd get 408 hp. But that engine would only be 4608cc. If they went +4mm on the bore, it would be 5009cc. Dead on 5 litres. The alternative would be to keep the same bore but add 7mm of high rpm killing stroke for 4997cc. Stroking it will drop the 20 m/sec red line to 6660 rpm, keeping the 2GR stroke puts redline at a familiar 7500 rpm exactly. Oh, yeah, the IS350 has a lot more rpm capability than we can use with the OEM rev limiter. I think they're concerned about the valve train though, not mean piston speed.
Also, FWIW, the IS350 makes 51 hp per cylinder. If we just added two cylinders with no other changes we'd get 408 hp. But that engine would only be 4608cc. If they went +4mm on the bore, it would be 5009cc. Dead on 5 litres. The alternative would be to keep the same bore but add 7mm of high rpm killing stroke for 4997cc. Stroking it will drop the 20 m/sec red line to 6660 rpm, keeping the 2GR stroke puts redline at a familiar 7500 rpm exactly. Oh, yeah, the IS350 has a lot more rpm capability than we can use with the OEM rev limiter. I think they're concerned about the valve train though, not mean piston speed.
Last edited by lobuxracer; 07-17-07 at 05:42 PM.