Notices
IS F (2008-2014) Discussion topics related to the IS F model

Stock intake drop-in filter testing results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 23, 2023 | 12:14 PM
  #1  
fearnight's Avatar
fearnight
Thread Starter
Driver
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 88
Likes: 37
From: Alabama
Default Stock intake drop-in filter testing results

Sharing my GS-F test results below with the IS-F forum:

https://www.clublexus.com/forums/gs-...g-results.html

Originally Posted by fearnight
The general consensus with the 2UR-GSE intake is to keep the stock airbox and use a drop-in air filter. Frequently, the aFe dry filter and Tom's Racing filter are recommended.

When I had my IS-F, I purchased both of these air filters. I didn't feel any difference between them and the stock air filter. I almost felt a slight loss in power, but I didn't have any data to it back up. I swapped back to the stock air filter and was happy.

I now have a GS-F and using OBD Fusion to gather some actual data. I recently changed the stock air filter (<500 miles ago), so figured this was a good time to test it against the drop-in filters I have. Both my aFe dry and Tom's Racing filters have less than 250 miles each on them.

Intake Mods:
  • RR Racing carbon heat shield
  • HPS silicone intake tube (post-MAF so shouldn’t affect the readings)
Test Conditions for all filters:
  • Hood open
  • Inside garage with door opened to the rear (no fans or outside airflow to the intake)
  • Coolant and oil temps at full operating temp
  • “Normal” drive mode selected
OBD Fusion:
  • Comparing the Mass Air Flow Rate (lb/min) at various RPM's
  • Idle reading, holding RPMs at 2,000, then 3,000
  • Using OBD Fusion "log" graph feature to measure readings

Results:
All MAF rates below are measured in lb/min

Stock air filter
Idle: 0.690
2,000 RPM: 1.500
3,000 RPM: 2.660

aFe dry filter
Idle: 0.695
2,000 RPM: 1.580
3,000 RPM: 2.700

Tom's Racing filter
Idle: 0.650
2,000 RPM: 1.500
3,000 RPM: 2.580

Since the Tom's Racing filter seems to be the forum favorite, I ran the exact test 3 times in a row with the same results.

Conclusion:
The aFe dry filter does seem to show a slight improvement in airflow compared to the stock paper filter. This makes sense due to the larger pleats.

Unfortunately, it appears the foam design of the Tom's filter has a slight airflow disadvantage compared to the pleated stock and aFe filters.

I've decided to stick with the stock air filter. To me, it's easier to just drop in a brand new filter than continually clean the aFe dry.

These results should apply to all 2UR-GSE vehicles, including the IS-F and RC-F. Hopefully this data is helpful to you as it was to me in my air filter decision.

Last edited by fearnight; Dec 23, 2023 at 12:17 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fearnight
GS F (2016-present)
4
Mar 24, 2025 06:43 AM
fearnight
RC F (2015-present)
17
Jan 3, 2024 02:49 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:46 AM.