Stock intake drop-in filter testing results
Sharing my GS-F test results below with the IS-F forum:
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/gs-...g-results.html
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/gs-...g-results.html
The general consensus with the 2UR-GSE intake is to keep the stock airbox and use a drop-in air filter. Frequently, the aFe dry filter and Tom's Racing filter are recommended.
When I had my IS-F, I purchased both of these air filters. I didn't feel any difference between them and the stock air filter. I almost felt a slight loss in power, but I didn't have any data to it back up. I swapped back to the stock air filter and was happy.
I now have a GS-F and using OBD Fusion to gather some actual data. I recently changed the stock air filter (<500 miles ago), so figured this was a good time to test it against the drop-in filters I have. Both my aFe dry and Tom's Racing filters have less than 250 miles each on them.
Intake Mods:
Results:
All MAF rates below are measured in lb/min
Stock air filter
Idle: 0.690
2,000 RPM: 1.500
3,000 RPM: 2.660
aFe dry filter
Idle: 0.695
2,000 RPM: 1.580
3,000 RPM: 2.700
Tom's Racing filter
Idle: 0.650
2,000 RPM: 1.500
3,000 RPM: 2.580
Since the Tom's Racing filter seems to be the forum favorite, I ran the exact test 3 times in a row with the same results.
Conclusion:
The aFe dry filter does seem to show a slight improvement in airflow compared to the stock paper filter. This makes sense due to the larger pleats.
Unfortunately, it appears the foam design of the Tom's filter has a slight airflow disadvantage compared to the pleated stock and aFe filters.
I've decided to stick with the stock air filter. To me, it's easier to just drop in a brand new filter than continually clean the aFe dry.
These results should apply to all 2UR-GSE vehicles, including the IS-F and RC-F. Hopefully this data is helpful to you as it was to me in my air filter decision.
When I had my IS-F, I purchased both of these air filters. I didn't feel any difference between them and the stock air filter. I almost felt a slight loss in power, but I didn't have any data to it back up. I swapped back to the stock air filter and was happy.
I now have a GS-F and using OBD Fusion to gather some actual data. I recently changed the stock air filter (<500 miles ago), so figured this was a good time to test it against the drop-in filters I have. Both my aFe dry and Tom's Racing filters have less than 250 miles each on them.
Intake Mods:
- RR Racing carbon heat shield
- HPS silicone intake tube (post-MAF so shouldn’t affect the readings)
- Hood open
- Inside garage with door opened to the rear (no fans or outside airflow to the intake)
- Coolant and oil temps at full operating temp
- “Normal” drive mode selected
- Comparing the Mass Air Flow Rate (lb/min) at various RPM's
- Idle reading, holding RPMs at 2,000, then 3,000
- Using OBD Fusion "log" graph feature to measure readings
Results:
All MAF rates below are measured in lb/min
Stock air filter
Idle: 0.690
2,000 RPM: 1.500
3,000 RPM: 2.660
aFe dry filter
Idle: 0.695
2,000 RPM: 1.580
3,000 RPM: 2.700
Tom's Racing filter
Idle: 0.650
2,000 RPM: 1.500
3,000 RPM: 2.580
Since the Tom's Racing filter seems to be the forum favorite, I ran the exact test 3 times in a row with the same results.
Conclusion:
The aFe dry filter does seem to show a slight improvement in airflow compared to the stock paper filter. This makes sense due to the larger pleats.
Unfortunately, it appears the foam design of the Tom's filter has a slight airflow disadvantage compared to the pleated stock and aFe filters.
I've decided to stick with the stock air filter. To me, it's easier to just drop in a brand new filter than continually clean the aFe dry.
These results should apply to all 2UR-GSE vehicles, including the IS-F and RC-F. Hopefully this data is helpful to you as it was to me in my air filter decision.
Last edited by fearnight; Dec 23, 2023 at 12:17 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







