IS - 3rd Gen (2014-present) Discussion about the 2014+ model IS models

IS 350 F sport AWD vs. RWD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-14, 06:10 PM
  #1  
bp044
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
bp044's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: new york
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default IS 350 F sport AWD vs. RWD

I have contacted dealers as far south as Florida. I want to buy a 350F Sport rear wheel drive. Nebula Gray. No dealer seems to have one in stock despite the fact that many of their websites show them as being in stock. I don't want the extra cost , complexity ,weight and poorer handling of an all wheel drive car
Can anyone quantify the difference in handling between the two drives ?
Old 03-21-14, 06:23 PM
  #2  
Vairox
Pit Crew
 
Vairox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: California
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Only AWD vehicle I had was an 11' WRX and it handled great, the only reason I didn't get the AWD 350 was the tranny. Both should have understeer with the offset tires so I don't see how the AWD is going to handle any worse than the RWD. It should really come down to weight and tranny.
Old 03-21-14, 07:26 PM
  #3  
Aeromotive
Pole Position
 
Aeromotive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

This thread has all the information you need. I'm in the same boat, wanting an IS350 RWD but can't test drive it.
Old 12-11-15, 07:35 PM
  #4  
derekis350
Driver School Candidate
 
derekis350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Ontario
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I oove my is350 awd f sport 3 seris. I test drove the rwd, and the bmw 335 sedan. I still went with the is350 awd, just because im in canada
Old 12-11-15, 07:47 PM
  #5  
Taideee
Rookie
 
Taideee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Washington
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

you won't have much understeer with swaybars :O
Old 12-12-15, 09:25 AM
  #6  
theoryguy
Pole Position
 
theoryguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NY
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If you live in NY you're better off with AWD especially when the snow hits. My sister has a 16 RWD IS350 in USB as she lives in Cali and we both think the AWD handles better though she has a better-equipped car. That Levinson audio system blows the stock away. IMHO.
Old 12-12-15, 11:08 AM
  #7  
derekis350
Driver School Candidate
 
derekis350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Ontario
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeaa man. Mark lenvsion sound sustem worth every cent you pay extra for the F3 seris
Old 12-14-15, 05:44 AM
  #8  
tC2IS350
Driver
 
tC2IS350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: PA
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I wouldn't want a RWD in NY unless you aren't going to drive it in the winter. and I'm not sure what you mean about the "poor handling" of an AWD
Old 12-14-15, 06:34 AM
  #9  
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
JDR76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 12,329
Received 1,603 Likes on 1,021 Posts
Default

Motor Trend did a pretty thorough comparison of the IS models. While there are benefits to each drivetrain, and lots of personal preferences, I wouldn't dismiss the AWD as being slow or a poor handler. Here are some comments from the Motor Trend comparison:

On the AWD 350:

When it comes to how the car drives, the difference is less obvious. You might expect the AWD would change the handling characteristics, but it isn’t noticeable. The steering is no heavier and no less communicative, and there’s no hint of torque steer. An advantage of the full-time all-wheel drive system is you’ll never feel the front axle connecting and disconnecting, which means it won’t upset the handling. A disadvantage is a small penalty in fuel economy, which is already slightly low for the class. Understeer is still the default when you test the limits.
http://www.motortrend.com/news/2014-...-awd-update-3/

On the RWD 350 F Sport:

That’s what F Sport is. Here’s what it does: Our long-term F Sport needed 5.6 seconds to hit 60 mph and 14.0 seconds flat to run the quarter-mile, trapping at 99.8 mph. You’ll note, though, that this is slower than the IS 350 AWD it replaced in the long-term fleet. That car, with its all-wheel-drive grip, got a much better launch and hit 60 mph in 5.3 seconds on the way to a 13.9-second quarter mile at 99.4 mph. The rear-wheel-drive F Sport had some trouble putting the power down, something I think better tires would’ve helped, perhaps Potenzas instead of Turanzas.
http://www.motortrend.com/news/2014-...port-update-5/
Old 12-14-15, 10:41 AM
  #10  
theoryguy
Pole Position
 
theoryguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NY
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JDR76
Motor Trend did a pretty thorough comparison of the IS models. While there are benefits to each drivetrain, and lots of personal preferences, I wouldn't dismiss the AWD as being slow or a poor handler. Here are some comments from the Motor Trend comparison:

On the AWD 350:



http://www.motortrend.com/news/2014-...-awd-update-3/

On the RWD 350 F Sport:



http://www.motortrend.com/news/2014-...port-update-5/

Great post. If I were the OP, I would get an IS350 AWD with the Levinson audio system from the midwest or down south (DC/VA area).
Old 12-22-15, 11:48 AM
  #11  
bp044
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
bp044's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: new york
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tC2IS350
I wouldn't want a RWD in NY unless you aren't going to drive it in the winter. and I'm not sure what you mean about the "poor handling" of an AWD
Sorry, I was refering to the steering which i found which iI found vague and over assisted
Old 12-23-15, 10:30 AM
  #12  
goldengame
Pole Position
 
goldengame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I've driven both of them, and other than the transmission, it's hard to tell a difference in normal driving. Personally, if I had a choice, I'd go with the RWD because the transmission is a bit better and it gets slightly better mileage.
Old 12-23-15, 10:45 AM
  #13  
speedneed
Rookie
 
speedneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: MD
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I ended up test driving the AWD first before purchasing the RWD. My only complaint was the slightly annoying bulge next to the console where my right leg sat, thanks to the AWD system. Not a huge complaint though.
Old 12-26-15, 08:12 AM
  #14  
halfnyce07
Driver
 
halfnyce07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: MA
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Im in northeastern MA, and I had an AWD IS250 and when I lowered it on springs and F-Sport shocks , I got a terrible vibration when the car wasn't in park. I hated it. I got the RWD this time specifically for that reason. Threw on some all seasons and hoping we don't have a freak winter like last year. But fortunately for me I work in town so my commute isn't far.
Old 12-28-15, 10:51 AM
  #15  
Noeh
Advanced
iTrader: (3)
 
Noeh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: CA
Posts: 734
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by halfnyce07
Im in northeastern MA, and I had an AWD IS250 and when I lowered it on springs and F-Sport shocks , I got a terrible vibration when the car wasn't in park. I hated it. I got the RWD this time specifically for that reason. Threw on some all seasons and hoping we don't have a freak winter like last year. But fortunately for me I work in town so my commute isn't far.
Seems like 3IS owners don't have that issue.


Quick Reply: IS 350 F sport AWD vs. RWD



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:40 PM.