IS - 3rd Gen (2014-present) Discussion about the 2014+ model IS models

IS 350 F sport AWD vs. RWD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 21, 2014 | 06:10 PM
  #1  
bp044's Avatar
bp044
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: new york
Default IS 350 F sport AWD vs. RWD

I have contacted dealers as far south as Florida. I want to buy a 350F Sport rear wheel drive. Nebula Gray. No dealer seems to have one in stock despite the fact that many of their websites show them as being in stock. I don't want the extra cost , complexity ,weight and poorer handling of an all wheel drive car
Can anyone quantify the difference in handling between the two drives ?
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2014 | 06:23 PM
  #2  
Vairox's Avatar
Vairox
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 139
Likes: 1
From: California
Default

Only AWD vehicle I had was an 11' WRX and it handled great, the only reason I didn't get the AWD 350 was the tranny. Both should have understeer with the offset tires so I don't see how the AWD is going to handle any worse than the RWD. It should really come down to weight and tranny.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2014 | 07:26 PM
  #3  
Aeromotive's Avatar
Aeromotive
Pole Position
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 384
Likes: 2
From: Montreal, QC
Default

This thread has all the information you need. I'm in the same boat, wanting an IS350 RWD but can't test drive it.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2015 | 07:35 PM
  #4  
derekis350's Avatar
derekis350
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Ontario
Default

I oove my is350 awd f sport 3 seris. I test drove the rwd, and the bmw 335 sedan. I still went with the is350 awd, just because im in canada
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2015 | 07:47 PM
  #5  
Taideee's Avatar
Taideee
Rookie
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Washington
Default

you won't have much understeer with swaybars :O
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2015 | 09:25 AM
  #6  
theoryguy's Avatar
theoryguy
Pole Position
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 259
Likes: 1
From: NY
Default

If you live in NY you're better off with AWD especially when the snow hits. My sister has a 16 RWD IS350 in USB as she lives in Cali and we both think the AWD handles better though she has a better-equipped car. That Levinson audio system blows the stock away. IMHO.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2015 | 11:08 AM
  #7  
derekis350's Avatar
derekis350
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Ontario
Default

Yeaa man. Mark lenvsion sound sustem worth every cent you pay extra for the F3 seris
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2015 | 05:44 AM
  #8  
tC2IS350's Avatar
tC2IS350
Driver
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

I wouldn't want a RWD in NY unless you aren't going to drive it in the winter. and I'm not sure what you mean about the "poor handling" of an AWD
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2015 | 06:34 AM
  #9  
JDR76's Avatar
JDR76
Lexus Champion
10 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 13,171
Likes: 1,823
From: WA
Default

Motor Trend did a pretty thorough comparison of the IS models. While there are benefits to each drivetrain, and lots of personal preferences, I wouldn't dismiss the AWD as being slow or a poor handler. Here are some comments from the Motor Trend comparison:

On the AWD 350:

When it comes to how the car drives, the difference is less obvious. You might expect the AWD would change the handling characteristics, but it isn’t noticeable. The steering is no heavier and no less communicative, and there’s no hint of torque steer. An advantage of the full-time all-wheel drive system is you’ll never feel the front axle connecting and disconnecting, which means it won’t upset the handling. A disadvantage is a small penalty in fuel economy, which is already slightly low for the class. Understeer is still the default when you test the limits.
http://www.motortrend.com/news/2014-...-awd-update-3/

On the RWD 350 F Sport:

That’s what F Sport is. Here’s what it does: Our long-term F Sport needed 5.6 seconds to hit 60 mph and 14.0 seconds flat to run the quarter-mile, trapping at 99.8 mph. You’ll note, though, that this is slower than the IS 350 AWD it replaced in the long-term fleet. That car, with its all-wheel-drive grip, got a much better launch and hit 60 mph in 5.3 seconds on the way to a 13.9-second quarter mile at 99.4 mph. The rear-wheel-drive F Sport had some trouble putting the power down, something I think better tires would’ve helped, perhaps Potenzas instead of Turanzas.
http://www.motortrend.com/news/2014-...port-update-5/
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2015 | 10:41 AM
  #10  
theoryguy's Avatar
theoryguy
Pole Position
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 259
Likes: 1
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by JDR76
Motor Trend did a pretty thorough comparison of the IS models. While there are benefits to each drivetrain, and lots of personal preferences, I wouldn't dismiss the AWD as being slow or a poor handler. Here are some comments from the Motor Trend comparison:

On the AWD 350:



http://www.motortrend.com/news/2014-...-awd-update-3/

On the RWD 350 F Sport:



http://www.motortrend.com/news/2014-...port-update-5/

Great post. If I were the OP, I would get an IS350 AWD with the Levinson audio system from the midwest or down south (DC/VA area).
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2015 | 11:48 AM
  #11  
bp044's Avatar
bp044
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: new york
Default

Originally Posted by tC2IS350
I wouldn't want a RWD in NY unless you aren't going to drive it in the winter. and I'm not sure what you mean about the "poor handling" of an AWD
Sorry, I was refering to the steering which i found which iI found vague and over assisted
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2015 | 10:30 AM
  #12  
goldengame's Avatar
goldengame
Pole Position
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 294
Likes: 4
From: CA
Default

I've driven both of them, and other than the transmission, it's hard to tell a difference in normal driving. Personally, if I had a choice, I'd go with the RWD because the transmission is a bit better and it gets slightly better mileage.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2015 | 10:45 AM
  #13  
speedneed's Avatar
speedneed
Rookie
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 52
Likes: 1
From: MD
Default

I ended up test driving the AWD first before purchasing the RWD. My only complaint was the slightly annoying bulge next to the console where my right leg sat, thanks to the AWD system. Not a huge complaint though.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2015 | 08:12 AM
  #14  
halfnyce07's Avatar
halfnyce07
Driver
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: MA
Default

Im in northeastern MA, and I had an AWD IS250 and when I lowered it on springs and F-Sport shocks , I got a terrible vibration when the car wasn't in park. I hated it. I got the RWD this time specifically for that reason. Threw on some all seasons and hoping we don't have a freak winter like last year. But fortunately for me I work in town so my commute isn't far.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2015 | 10:51 AM
  #15  
Noeh's Avatar
Noeh
Advanced
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 735
Likes: 10
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by halfnyce07
Im in northeastern MA, and I had an AWD IS250 and when I lowered it on springs and F-Sport shocks , I got a terrible vibration when the car wasn't in park. I hated it. I got the RWD this time specifically for that reason. Threw on some all seasons and hoping we don't have a freak winter like last year. But fortunately for me I work in town so my commute isn't far.
Seems like 3IS owners don't have that issue.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:56 PM.