GX - 2nd Gen (2010-2023) Discussion topics related to the 2010 + GX460 models

Making The GX More #Efficient - #MPG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 21, 2021 | 07:30 AM
  #46  
Lexus4321's Avatar
Lexus4321
Instructor
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 968
Likes: 137
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by gadgetman1
Comparing the GX with anything Ford is apples & spiders - they share nothing alike. I’m comparing GM’s naturally aspirated with Toyota’s. Yes, the Toyota will last longer, but most people will never keep a vehicle that long.
Has noting to do with "ford" or "toyota". One is turbo'd and the other is NA. Two totally different technologies pumping/sucking air into a ICE.
Toyota would be dominating in power if they put a Rotrex on the Tundra, or a turbo on tacoma or rav4 4cyl. FA engines don't last as long.

There's little to do to make a NA ICE be more fuel efficient, short of re-engineering the intake and exhaust systems, making the air pump more efficient.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2021 | 07:37 AM
  #47  
Seanzky's Avatar
Seanzky
Intermediate
 
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 353
Likes: 211
From: TX
Default

The only way I can see the GX gain a few MPGs on the highway is by lowering it (lowering springs or coilovers) and adding air dams where needed undercarriage... but all of these go directly against the reasons why so many buy this SUV. Shedding weight will also help, like leaving the spare at home, etc.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2021 | 05:17 PM
  #48  
Lexus4321's Avatar
Lexus4321
Instructor
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 968
Likes: 137
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by Seanzky
The only way I can see the GX gain a few MPGs on the highway is by lowering it (lowering springs or coilovers) and adding air dams where needed undercarriage... but all of these go directly against the reasons why so many buy this SUV. Shedding weight will also help, like leaving the spare at home, etc.
I didn't want to go there, but yeah, to buy a GX and worry about MPG's, doesn't make much sense to me.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2021 | 05:39 PM
  #49  
GrizzlyClint's Avatar
GrizzlyClint
Instructor
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 872
Likes: 428
From: Idaho
Default

Originally Posted by Seanzky
The only way I can see the GX gain a few MPGs on the highway is by lowering it (lowering springs or coilovers) and adding air dams where needed undercarriage... but all of these go directly against the reasons why so many buy this SUV. Shedding weight will also help, like leaving the spare at home, etc.
The 470 is considerably more aerodynamic than a 460, especially a 2014+ 460. The problem with the GX isn’t so much aerodynamics it’s lack of forward gears in the transmission, being under powered and weight. An 8spd or 10spd trans would help as would cylinder deactivation. The latter not being something that’s as robust for Toyota’s liking. Too bad because a combo of an 8spd and cylinder deactivation pushed my two HEMI Chargers 35-40 mpg on the highway depending on elevation change frequencies. I can only imagine what shedding a few hundred lbs and adding an 8spd trans would do to the fuel economy. But too little too late. A hybrid is Toyota’s only legit hope to get the GX up in to averaging mpg in the 20’s. In the real world a turbo V6 just won’t cut it.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2021 | 07:16 PM
  #50  
Seanzky's Avatar
Seanzky
Intermediate
 
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 353
Likes: 211
From: TX
Default

I agree about the 8-10 speed transmission. Spreading out the gears would help tremendously. The drag coefficient is a lost cause for the GX. I've just accepted I was going to pay the "ultimate reliability tax" from day one. Haha.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2021 | 11:05 AM
  #51  
gadgetman1's Avatar
gadgetman1
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,404
Likes: 215
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by MrTorgue
The 470 is considerably more aerodynamic than a 460, especially a 2014+ 460. The problem with the GX isn’t so much aerodynamics it’s lack of forward gears in the transmission, being under powered and weight. An 8spd or 10spd trans would help as would cylinder deactivation. The latter not being something that’s as robust for Toyota’s liking. Too bad because a combo of an 8spd and cylinder deactivation pushed my two HEMI Chargers 35-40 mpg on the highway depending on elevation change frequencies. I can only imagine what shedding a few hundred lbs and adding an 8spd trans would do to the fuel economy. But too little too late. A hybrid is Toyota’s only legit hope to get the GX up in to averaging mpg in the 20’s. In the real world a turbo V6 just won’t cut it.
Toyota could blow the doors off of all its competition, if they would import the GX & LX with their bulletproof twin turbo V-6 diesel. I would buy one in a heartbeat! So far, GM’s in-line 6 Duramax diesel is the one to beat. You can get a Suburban, Yukon or even an Escalade that gets mid twenties (mpg)!
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2021 | 11:22 AM
  #52  
Piney1's Avatar
Piney1
Advanced
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 529
Likes: 315
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by MrTorgue
An 8spd or 10spd trans would help as would cylinder deactivation. The latter not being something that’s as robust for Toyota’s liking..
The cylinder deactivation stuff ruins the motors. At least it did for for the fleet of Tahoes I used to oversee. They were all cop cars that idle a lot and every single one of them had issues. It got so bad that we went in and deactivated the ‘feature’ - solved the problem. Spending extra to save on fuel but ruining the long term reliability of the motor is not a win. Ford ruined the 5.0 with their efficiency stuff too - have 20 or so of them now and they all burn oil. It is a shame.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2021 | 01:15 PM
  #53  
ASE's Avatar
ASE
Pole Position
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,727
Likes: 1,461
From: WA
Default

Originally Posted by Piney1
The cylinder deactivation stuff ruins the motors. At least it did for for the fleet of Tahoes I used to oversee. They were all cop cars that idle a lot and every single one of them had issues. It got so bad that we went in and deactivated the ‘feature’ - solved the problem. Spending extra to save on fuel but ruining the long term reliability of the motor is not a win. Ford ruined the 5.0 with their efficiency stuff too - have 20 or so of them now and they all burn oil. It is a shame.
... as is the auto-turn-off feature designed to save fuel at stop lights. Assuming the lingering oil film is exactly the same as having constant oil pressure ... don't think so ... and then there is the additional starter wear-and-tear. Now here's an idea ... let's eliminate the 10% ethanol from gasoline and gain a 3-4% improvement in MPG. Ethanol-Free gasoline is available in select locations ... https://www.pure-gas.org/

Last edited by ASE; Dec 22, 2021 at 01:33 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2021 | 01:59 PM
  #54  
gadgetman1's Avatar
gadgetman1
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,404
Likes: 215
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Piney1
The cylinder deactivation stuff ruins the motors. At least it did for for the fleet of Tahoes I used to oversee. They were all cop cars that idle a lot and every single one of them had issues. It got so bad that we went in and deactivated the ‘feature’ - solved the problem. Spending extra to save on fuel but ruining the long term reliability of the motor is not a win. Ford ruined the 5.0 with their efficiency stuff too - have 20 or so of them now and they all burn oil. It is a shame.
What about the Chrysler hemi? They had a cylinder deactivation system & I never heard about the same problems as GM vehicles.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2021 | 05:28 PM
  #55  
GrizzlyClint's Avatar
GrizzlyClint
Instructor
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 872
Likes: 428
From: Idaho
Default

Originally Posted by Seanzky
I agree about the 8-10 speed transmission. Spreading out the gears would help tremendously. The drag coefficient is a lost cause for the GX. I've just accepted I was going to pay the "ultimate reliability tax" from day one. Haha.
Hah, reliability tax. That’s a great way to put it.

Originally Posted by Piney1
The cylinder deactivation stuff ruins the motors. At least it did for for the fleet of Tahoes I used to oversee. They were all cop cars that idle a lot and every single one of them had issues. It got so bad that we went in and deactivated the ‘feature’ - solved the problem. Spending extra to save on fuel but ruining the long term reliability of the motor is not a win. Ford ruined the 5.0 with their efficiency stuff too - have 20 or so of them now and they all burn oil. It is a shame.
That’s why I said it isn’t something Toyota would do. I will say the ones I had in my last three HEMI’s were great.

Originally Posted by gadgetman1
What about the Chrysler hemi? They had a cylinder deactivation system & I never heard about the same problems as GM vehicles.
It’s not a common problem. I never had issues in the three vehicles with 5.7’s that had it. I only have good things to say about what it did for my fuel economy.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2021 | 08:28 AM
  #56  
Piney1's Avatar
Piney1
Advanced
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 529
Likes: 315
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by gadgetman1
What about the Chrysler hemi? They had a cylinder deactivation system & I never heard about the same problems as GM vehicles.
Not sure, never bought them for cruisers. The highway patrols use them because they are inexpensive and run 150 or so. I prefer the Tahoe or F150 because they are large and safe. The deactivation causes issues with the lifters and the cams. You’ll spend far more fixing them than you’ll sped on fuel.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2021 | 10:09 AM
  #57  
ASE's Avatar
ASE
Pole Position
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,727
Likes: 1,461
From: WA
Default

So the OP asked about how THE EXISTING can be improved from an MPG standpoint. Don't know how this post spiraled off into alternative engines. How is this information in any way helpful ?
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2021 | 10:25 AM
  #58  
gadgetman1's Avatar
gadgetman1
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,404
Likes: 215
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by ASE
So the OP asked about how THE EXISTING can be improved from an MPG standpoint. Don't know how this post spiraled off into alternative engines. How is this information in any way helpful ?
We drifted off by discussing how other manufacturers are getting more mpg out of their competing SUVs. It’s all good as I’ve learned a few things.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2022 | 06:54 PM
  #59  
kamikazi's Avatar
kamikazi
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 46
Likes: 33
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by ASE
So the OP asked about how THE EXISTING can be improved from an MPG standpoint. Don't know how this post spiraled off into alternative engines. How is this information in any way helpful ?
Did stray but still on topic of fuel economy and I learned a few things. Worthy thread
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2022 | 06:55 PM
  #60  
kamikazi's Avatar
kamikazi
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 46
Likes: 33
From: NC
Default

And I have added “reliability tax” to the daily vocabulary for the GX world haha!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gadgetman1
RX - 4th Gen (2016-2022)
26
Aug 23, 2022 03:53 PM
shimps1
GX - 2nd Gen (2010-2023)
28
Jul 12, 2018 08:47 AM
MPLexus301
Car Chat
35
May 29, 2010 05:25 AM
TomGXer
GX - 1st Gen (2003-2009)
11
Sep 26, 2007 10:45 AM
SilvahGX
GX - 1st Gen (2003-2009)
22
Jul 30, 2006 07:09 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:35 AM.